Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| the 3rd step would be to follow john spray's suggestion, and keep
| track of backend changes that affect gtk on the wiki or another
| appropriate place

I'll even take this one further... as long as there seems to be no
active gtk developers we should do nothing with it. We can keep it in
the tree for a while, but just let the code rot.

I know that John is listening in from time to time, but it is alos
very clear that he is the only person doing anything with gtk, and
that he is time limited.

-- 
        Lgb

Reply via email to