Helge Hafting wrote:
If you wonder what licence to use - read both and see what suits you best.
They are only a few pages.
Yes only a few pages but with complicated lawyer sentences.
Angus points me to this link
http://jan.netcomp.monash.edu.au/opendoc/paper.html
where all license types are explain
> "Michael" == Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Before, ellipses have been used in an inconsistent way; the
Michael> ellipses neither followed the GNOME _nor_ Jean-Marc's rule!
Michael> How was I supposed to know?
It seems I need to prepare seriously my defense. I do not
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 06:36:03PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
>
> >>http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/DocumentationDevelopment
> >
> >This webpage says "All files are under the GNU Free Documentation License
> >version 1.2", but the documentation was under GPL'd (as discussed on the
> >
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 09:55:18PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > ControlBranch.C (for example) is pretty trivial,
>
> [To a degree that make one wonder whether it is explicitly needed at all
> ... but you are right.]
I admit to be speaking from a position of ignorance wrt Qt 4, so I could
well
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 05:23:27PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 03:42:23PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > They seemingly learned a lesson or two. Qt 4 is conceptionally much
> > cleaner than Qt 3 and older.
>
> That's encouraging to hear, I suppose.
The price is that you
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 06:08:03PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
>
> >Unfortunately, I was over-ruled (by jmarc iirc) regarding the
> >interpretation of this. In particular, in LyX ellipses mean "this will
> >bring up a dialog". I abide by the judge's decision :)
>
>
> John +
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:36:42AM -0400, Bennett Helm wrote:
> 1.0%62.8% LyX lengthcombo.C:72
> 0.7%60.2% LyX lengthcombo.C:72
> 57.6% 59.1% LyX lengthcombo.C:72
> 0.7%0.7%LyX NO_SRC_FILE:?
> 0.6%0
Hello JMarc!
From what I remember, the reason why Andre decided to handle math
macros like that is because some macro arguments can appear more than
once in a given macro, like \newcommand{\foo}[2]{#1+#2+#1}. Do you
handle this case?
Yes, this case does not really need any special treatment. The on
On Sun, 15 May 2005, [UTF-8] Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/DocumentationDevelopment
This webpage says "All files are under the GNU Free Documentation License
version 1.2", but the documentation was under GPL'd (as discussed on the
list months ago). When was this changed?
Jeremy C.
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>>>http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/DocumentationDevelopment
>>
>> This webpage says "All files are under the GNU Free Documentation
>> License version 1.2", but the documentation was under GPL'd (as
>> discussed on the list months ago). When was this changed?
>
> I didn't know about the
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/DocumentationDevelopment
This webpage says "All files are under the GNU Free Documentation License
version 1.2", but the documentation was under GPL'd (as discussed on the
list months ago). When was this changed?
I didn't know about the license of the d
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 06:08:03PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> >Unfortunately, I was over-ruled (by jmarc iirc) regarding the
> >interpretation of this. In particular, in LyX ellipses mean "this will
> >bring up a dialog". I abide by the judge's decision :)
> >
>
> John + Michael = 2, Jean -
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 03:42:23PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> They seemingly learned a lesson or two. Qt 4 is conceptionally much
> cleaner than Qt 3 and older.
That's encouraging to hear, I suppose.
> > Surely you agree that the hard, time consuming stuff is in the core, and
> > it always ha
Michael Schmitt wrote:
> That means we do not consider classic.ui as a serious alternative. Which
> again raises the question why we have it at all...
Because human beings aren't entirely logical. In fact, some of them hate
change even when change is for the good.
--
Angus
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 01:03:42PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>> Or we can just provide a simple interface from lyxrc that uses Qt if the
>> frontend has something. This is just not difficult to do.
>>
>> > > Furthermore, they encourage commingling of frontend code with logic
John Levon wrote:
Unfortunately, I was over-ruled (by jmarc iirc) regarding the
interpretation of this. In particular, in LyX ellipses mean "this will
bring up a dialog". I abide by the judge's decision :)
John + Michael = 2, Jean - Marc = 1. Hmmm, we have overruled him again :-)
So your changes
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On Sun, 15 May 2005, [UTF-8] Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>
>> http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/DocumentationDevelopment
>
> This webpage says "All files are under the GNU Free Documentation License
> version 1.2", but the documentation was under GPL'd (as discussed on the
> list months ago).
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 01:03:42PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Or we can just provide a simple interface from lyxrc that uses Qt if the
> frontend has something. This is just not difficult to do.
>
> > > Furthermore, they encourage commingling of frontend code with logic
> > > code, which is just a
On May 13, 2005, at 3:54 PM, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 03:23:16PM -0400, Bennett Helm wrote:
On May 13, 2005, at 10:56 AM, Martin Vermeer wrote:
(I tried doing a "Function Trace" within Shark, specifying
QFontEngineMac::doTextTask as the function to trace, but I get the
followin
On May 13, 2005, at 4:38 PM, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 10:39:16AM -0400, Bennett Helm wrote:
Setting granularity to be "Source Line" gives the following:
59.4% 61.3% LyX lengthcombo.C:63
0.8%0.8%LyX NO_SRC_FILE:?
0.7%0.8%
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 04:36:21PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Please check the patch carefully (John L.?) and commit it. Regarding the
> use of "...", please note the following excerpt from the GNOME human
> interface guidelines:
>
> "Label the menu item with a trailing ellipsis ("...") o
Hello,
I have made some text changes to the UI files. Once again, the overall
objective is consistency, consistency, consistency...
Please check the patch carefully (John L.?) and commit it. Regarding the
use of "...", please note the following excerpt from the GNOME human
interface guidelines:
> QSettings gives us e.g. (transparent) access to the Windows registry,
> where all the Window native programs put there configuration stuff and
> "everybody" expects it. When not using Qt we've a choice of either
> programming this access ourselves or remain some kind of sevond class
> citizen by
On 5/16/05 1:36 AM, "Angus Leeming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rob Bearman wrote:
>>> p.s. Angus, I noticed, that you added some patches to compile LyX with
>>> MSVC. Could you post an instruction for the compilation of LyX 1.4CVS
>>> with MSVC.
>>
>> Instructions for compiling with Visual Stud
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 09:22:27AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> QSettings gives us e.g. (transparent) access to the Windows registry,
> where all the Window native programs put there configuration stuff and
> "everybody" expects it. When not using Qt we've a choice of either
> programming this ac
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 09:49:50PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> And while the LyX community discusses the pros and cons of various
> frontends, wonders whether there is a need to maintain multiple
> frontends and whether a GUII is a good thing (even though it may not
> longer serve its origin
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 07:59:12PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 08:01:50PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > > I see no evidence of this. When has it been a burden since Angus did
> > > the dialogs nicely?
> >
> > It prevents us from using all the platform abstraction Qt wou
On Friday 13 May 2005 21:15, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the email subject says it all. It seems that lyx2lyx must be
> fixed before LyX 1.4 is ready for the Windows platform.
Michael could you open a new report on bugzilla for this issue?
I plan to fix this issue this week and a
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 12:52:50PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> Agree... I don't think GUI-I itself is a burden. Rather, it is something
>> we should be doing anyway, but having to accomodate more than one
>> front end forces the issue. Of course every front end brings it
Angus Leeming wrote:
>> This patch removes the test of "file name with space" from the file
>> browser and places it in the input widget itself. (Qt frontend only for
>> now.)
>>
>> A warning is popped up the first time that an invalid file name is
>> input. The "OK" button is disabled if the inpu
Rob Bearman wrote:
>> p.s. Angus, I noticed, that you added some patches to compile LyX with
>> MSVC. Could you post an instruction for the compilation of LyX 1.4CVS
>> with MSVC.
>
> Instructions for compiling with Visual Studio.NET 2003 exist in
> src/development/win32/readme.txt. Building LyX i
31 matches
Mail list logo
