On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 03:37:35PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Andre, undo continues to have problems despite your last patch.
That's bad news, especially since my next free slot on a private
'development' machine will be in two weeks' time. I don't even have a
working LyX here to check.
>
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 08:07:58PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > We could e.g. have a 'metrics dirty flag' which is set to true
> > by default and in cases we know that we haven't changed anything (i.e.
> > just selecting and the creen hasn't moved) we set it to fal
Andreas Vox wrote:
> Today's CVS version doesn't crash any more, but cursor positioning in
> maths isn't finished:
>
> - I can't reach some positions in inner insets, instead the cursor goes to
> the
> edge of some outer inset (Mouse _and_ Keyboard)
I'll have a look.
> - Sometimes the cursor
Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > but look what happend when I just tried that: (see bugreport at the end)
> > I was just scrolling to the math section of de_Userguide and
> > clicking randomly ...
>
> Please try again with current CoordBranch. Anything else?
Today's CVS version
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 01:23:54PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > Comments?
> >
> > LyX[Glue]Length arguments should be passed by reference.
>
> I don't understand.
I think I saw some code similar to
void foo(LyXLength len);
This should be
void foo(LyXLen
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 02:46:53PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Third time you repeat this nonsense. Who's rushing anything?
>
> Andre seems pretty eager.
Because ifrst of all, I think it's the right sthink to do technically,
and secondly, I see messages on lyx-cvs telling me that Alfred
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> We could e.g. have a 'metrics dirty flag' which is set to true
> by default and in cases we know that we haven't changed anything (i.e.
> just selecting and the creen hasn't moved) we set it to false.
Sure, but metrics is only one thing.
When selecting, the bottleneck is
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 03:03:06AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Just because it is better than head does not mean that we should rush
> to get it into head.
I disagree especially since needlessly maintaining the branch bites
into the most valuable resources we currently have: Alfredo's time
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 12:48:52AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Mmm... I'm not 100% sure. The point is how to make these optimizations in a
> way that keeps the code clean ;-)
We could e.g. have a 'metrics dirty flag' which is set to true
by default and in cases we know that we haven't chang
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> I think that he means just to replace
> boolÂLengthValidator::setBottom(LyXGlueLengthÂg)
> by
> boolÂLengthValidator::setBottom(LyXGlueLengthÂconst & g)
> and so on, whenever possible.
I see. OK, I'll change this.
Regards,
JÃrgen
> Regards, Alfredo
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>> LyX[Glue]Length arguments should be passed by reference.
>
> I don't understand.
Hi Juergen,
I think that he means just to replace
boolÂLengthValidator::setBottom(LyXGlueLengthÂg)
by
boolÂLengthValidator::setBottom(LyXGlueLengthÂconst & g)
and so on, whenever
Lars Gullik BjÃnnes wrote:
> coord might be better than what the head was lately, but it is not
> better than what head used to be.
I surely agree. (maybe we disagree with the dates: I think it is slow from
about when we changed the drawing scheme -- i.e soon after 1.3.)
I'm not as sure as Andre
Lars Gullik BjÃnnes wrote:
> PS. It is not friday today.
;-)
I got confused with the timezone change and all...
Alfredo
Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | Andre Poenitz wrote:
>>>
Hm... you could just merge CoordBranch back to HEAD. From wht I can tell
>>>
>> | Not all people here seem to agree.
>>
>> Just b
Lars Gullik BjÃnnes wrote:
> Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Andre Poenitz wrote:
>>
>>> Hm... you could just merge CoordBranch back to HEAD. From wht I can tell
>>
> | Not all people here seem to agree.
>
> Just because it is better than head does not mean that we should ru
Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Loading times is not the crux of everything.
>
| Of course not.
|
>> I think we must look at how much we redraw on update as well.
>
| I think that speed is mostly irrelevant at this stage (plenty of
| regressions)
Lars Gullik BjÃnnes wrote:
> Loading times is not the crux of everything.
Of course not.
> I think we must look at how much we redraw on update as well.
I think that speed is mostly irrelevant at this stage (plenty of
regressions). What I really cannot understand is this sudden rush to
address
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Comments?
>
> LyX[Glue]Length arguments should be passed by reference.
I don't understand.
Jürgen
18 matches
Mail list logo
