On Sunday 07 December 2003 06:53 am, you wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 03:03:42PM -0500, Kuba Ober wrote:
> > There will also be some constraints as to how far a character style can
> > go. I imagine we will artificially need to terminate all character
> > styling at the end of the paragraph, ot
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Does this help?
Andre> A bit. But I still can't answer anything else than 'does not
Andre> look wrong, does not sound wrong...'
I understand that. I am just posting to see whether ideas emerge :)
I'll probably commit that to 1.3.4cvs
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus, qt 2.3.0 does not have this setPaletteForegroundColor thing.
Shame! Ahhh well. It's just a bit of fun and not vital to the use of
the class. I'll wrap the contents of setWidget up inside some 3ifdef
magic for now.
--
Angus
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 06:26:17PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> So, I think that the implications are not a problem, but that it can
> probably be written in a cleaner way...
*shrug*
Didn't look like the messiest part of LyX...
> Does this help?
A bit. But I still can't answer anything
> "Kornel" == Kornel Benko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kornel> I did not read, but I tested it with the qt-lyx. For me it
Kornel> worked as expected (using konqueror for drag and lyx to drop
Kornel> into)
Yes, this works here too (with qt 2.3.0).
JMarc
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 05:51:14PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> Since nobody read my previous patch for dnd support in lyx/qt,
>> here is a second one that adds support for AppleEvent
>> OpenDocuments.
Andre> That'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Montag, 8. Dezember 2003 18:04, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 05:51:14PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Since nobody read my previous patch for dnd support in lyx/qt, here is
> > a second one that adds support for AppleEvent OpenDocume
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 05:51:14PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Since nobody read my previous patch for dnd support in lyx/qt, here is
> a second one that adds support for AppleEvent OpenDocuments.
That's wrong.
I read it. But I did not even understand what you were talking about
let a
Since nobody read my previous patch for dnd support in lyx/qt, here is
a second one that adds support for AppleEvent OpenDocuments.
Basically, with this one can double-click a file in the finder and
have the file open in a running LyX.
This second patch has been written by Ronald Florence, who fo
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:12:51PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > Straight-forward. Five lines at most.
> >
> > Which five lines?
> >
> > :-)
>
> Attached.
>
> Actually, I even think this feature is usable.
Not bad... I think this should be appli
I plan to apply this patch to 1.3.4cvs. This is already applied to
1.4.0cvs. Did anybody try drag and drop of .lyx files with 1.4.0cvs?
Did it work as expected?
JMarc
Index: src/BufferView_pimpl.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroo
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Please do so.
Done. Btw, for this month I'll be sort of "very slow in the mornings"... I'm
ok: I've only suffered a timezone warp!
Alfredo
I get the following error when compiling:
stlport -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../../lyx-devel/src/frontends/qt2 -I../../../src
-I../../../../lyx-devel/src/ -I../../../../lyx-devel/src/frontends/
-I../../../../lyx-devel/images -I/usr/lib/qt-2.3.0//include
-I../../../../lyx-devel/boost -I../../.
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 11:28:30AM +0100, Helge Hafting wrote:
> * Help->about lyx says Lyx 1.4.0cvs Thu, Jan 30, 2003. This made me suspect
> a cvs setup error, or doesn't the date reflect the latest change?
That's "ok".
> So, is "lyx-devel" development or stable?
The former with the general
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:12:51PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Straight-forward. Five lines at most.
>
> Which five lines?
>
> :-)
Attached.
Actually, I even think this feature is usable.
Andre'
? .math_cursor.C.swp
? 1.diff
? cursor.diff
Index: math_cursor.C
=
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 02:06:10PM +0100, Helge Hafting wrote:
[...]
gave me a src/lyx that don't want keyboard input. I can't type,
only move around and/or paste text.
I thought this just was the sort of things that might happen when
trying 1.4cvs versions.
It shouldn't. Is
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 09:46:16AM +0100, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
> > One could in the above situation make the first backspace invoke
> > selection of the previous bracketed expression. I don't know how hard
> > that is to implement.
>
> Straight-forward. Five lines at most.
Which five lin
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:12:16AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> What word-backward/forward could to is jump over insets instead of
> entering them. The equivalent of a 'word' in mathed is an inset (a
> block) IMO.
It does so already.
Andr'e
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 02:04:53AM -0300, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> this is the same patch proposed a week ago.
>
> - don't use cursors for loops
> - rewrite some loops in a more standard way
>
> pretty uncontroversial.
>
> I'll apply tomorrow if there are no objections.
Please do so.
Andre
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 01:46:47PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Hi
>
> Have the method of getting subscripts changed or something in 1.4 xforms?
> When I press '_' I actually get a '_' instead of a subscript?
> (Same thing goes for superscripts, '^' inserts a '^' :-(
I see that, too. Som
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 10:16:01PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Comments?
Looks good.
Andre'
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Now back from the break, my suggestion is that we change the
>> behaviour of word-backward/forward so that it uses something other
>> spaces as word separators. One idea could be to use '+' and '-',
>> essentially moving the cursor one
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 04:59:29PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 04:49:26PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> | Step 2. Almost mechanical.
> >>
> >> I wonder why
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 04:53:05PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | If the overlapping stuff is out and physical position == locical
> | position is in, all-boxes is (a) natural, (b) simple.
>
> I am not convinced...
>
> OTOH what I am convinc
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 04:45:23PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> What I'm telling you is that the problem goes completely away with
> >> ranges, because we then have a natural interface:
> >>
> >> Edit->Text_Style->Noun
> >>
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 01:10:29PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > BTW is it possible to get rid of the space at the beginning of a char style
> > inset?
>
> Apparently this has more than one source. One part of the problem is that the
> insettext inside the i
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 10:59:30AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> This is actually not a bad idea. But we sort-of have this now already.
> In MathEd, I never delete anything but single characters straightaway.
> I don't dare to :-( If I want to delete a bracketed expression etc., I
> always select
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 08:19:16PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > > You need to fix your window manager? SCNR
> >
> > Indeed. Save a few small changes I use the same configuration as 14
> > years ago.
>
> ok... and all new WM features since then are just crap? ;)
Maybe it's just their d
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 07:29:18PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> This started in some charStyle thread... it is about a suggestion to
> change the behaviour of C-left/right in mathed (aka word-backward/forward)
>
> Originally I was (approx.) complaining that it takes a lot of left/right's
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 07:49:38PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> I agree with Helge here, and it reminded me of a behaviour that's
> sometimes annoying in mathed. It happens quite often that I delete the
> previous 'box' without intending to when using the backspace key. An
> example (ju
Jan-Åke Larsson wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > 1. Here I had colour specials in the latex file. In future I will not
> > need them, right? Instead I'll pass them direct to dvipng, as above.
>
> Yes. You can do either.
The DVI colors are preferred, of course.
> > 2. I should prefer your -dept
31 matches
Mail list logo
