On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 04:59:29PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 04:49:26PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> | Step 2. Almost mechanical. > >> > >> I wonder why this is a good move. > > > | Because it consolidates common code of InsetText and Buffer in a single > | place (LyXText). > > But hasn't this rendered multiple views of the same buffer virtually > impossible?
No more difficult than before. The main text needs about the same per-view information as any other text inset (the only difference is that the main text starts always at (0,0), but that's not really worth a 'simplification' that duplicates lots of code'). Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
