On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 12:27:11AM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, John Levon wrote:
>
> > 4. Document .layout wizard
>
> It would be really nice, if you didn't have to restart LyX every time you
> change or add a .layout...
Or having a .layout as part of the .lyx.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:05:32PM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 10:57:36PM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> > Load the document below with current CVS.
> >
> > Click on the Navigate menu. You will see something like:
> >
> > _1_ Test
> > _2_ Another
> > _3_
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> > I'd really like to know, how slow does a computer need to be before
> > the buffer switch get unbearably slow. So some tests on P-III's and
> > P-II's would be nice (slower than that I do not
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Christian Ridderström wrote:
bläh... I've gotten loads of link errors now that I'm back. To be on the
safe side I erased *everything* and started over.
Here's the commands I used:
HEAD> rm -rf ^CVS*
HEAD> cd $LYXDEVEL/$LYXTAG ;
rm -rf build-$LYXFRONTEND ;
mkdir
Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, John Levon wrote:
>
>> 4. Document .layout wizard
>
| It would be really nice, if you didn't have to restart LyX every time you
| change or add a .layout...
>
| Or how about not having to restart LyX after doing a re-config
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, John Levon wrote:
> 4. Document .layout wizard
It would be really nice, if you didn't have to restart LyX every time you
change or add a .layout...
Or how about not having to restart LyX after doing a re-configuration...
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Kuba Ober wrote:
> On czwartek 16 pa¼dziernik 2003 10:05 am, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > Ok... I had another problem since QTDIR=/usr/lib/qt3-gcc2.96...
> >
> > I have no idea where this variable is set though...
>
> Wild guess: /etc/profile.d/qt.sh ?
Good guess :-)
h
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 06:54:25PM -0200, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> Lyx should work with a number of latex distributions, in many versions
> etc. It is hard to predict what will be the behavior of each one, and
> _maybe_ implementing a dialog like I sugested could be simpler and more
> re
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> > I think that the frontends should have a dialog with a tri-state
> > (radio) button as this:
> >
> > Inverse DVI search:
> > [ ] Disable
> > [ ] Latex option [ --src-specials ] <- text box
> > [ ] Package
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 10:57:36PM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> Load the document below with current CVS.
>
> Click on the Navigate menu. You will see something like:
>
> _1_ Test
> _2_ Another
> _3_ Section 3
> 1 Section inside branch
>
> and the message on the console:
>
I'm forwarding the below-quoted messages to and from the Aspell users
list for your information regarding the Spellchecking/Personal
Dictionary anomaly and the Mutex error message in case there is a lyx -
aspell binding problem.
Bill
>Hi
>Am Mittwoch, 8. Oktober 2003 20:20 schrieben Sie:
> Tha
On czwartek 16 październik 2003 10:05 am, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Ok... I had another problem since QTDIR=/usr/lib/qt3-gcc2.96...
>
> I have no idea where this variable is set though...
Wild guess: /etc/profile.d/qt.sh ?
Kuba
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 07:11:34PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>
> it? Can it collide with other packages etc? (maybe a checkbox to supress it
> after all?).
It can potentially screw up the spacing, but I don't know if this is indeed
a problem.
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
>
>> The patch attached plus the two files socket_callback.{C,h}, that
>> must be placed under src/frontends/qt2, solve add qt support (don't
>> forget to run autogen/configure). The files socket_callback.{C,h}
>> _really_ need to be ch
Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> The patch attached plus the two files socket_callback.{C,h}, that must be
> placed under src/frontends/qt2, solve add qt support (don't forget to run
> autogen/configure). The files socket_callback.{C,h} _really_ need to be
> checked by someone that understands q
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 06:53:51PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | ===
> | RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/lyxcursor.C,v
> | retrieving revision 1.26
> | diff -u -p -r1.26 lyxcursor.C
> | --- lyxcursor.C 9 Oct
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| See attached.
>
| --
| Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
| nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
>
| Index: lyxcursor.C
| ===
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Not tested (how would I get real numbers?)
>
> I don't expect it to be worse, though.
I was actually expecting it to be better with your per-paragraph y caching.
I'll make some profiling later if I get the energy.
Alfredo
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 06:49:55PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Not tested (how would I get real numbers?)
scroll event - start timer
end of document - end timer
a hack like that would probably work
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is ove
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 06:34:54PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> Andre> So 'lyx::support::ReplaceEnvironmentPath' curently wastes about
>> Andre> 20% of the time used by lyx startu
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 06:46:32PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 06:38:37PM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> >> Setting up the patterns just one cuts this from 20% down to 2.1%.
> >
> > Incidently, with this patch we are back at 1.3 speed:
>
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 06:34:54PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> wrote:
>> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> Andre> So 'lyx::support::ReplaceEnvironmentPath' curently wastes
>> about Andre> 20% of the time used by lyx startup + UserGuide
>> lo
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 06:38:37PM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
>> Setting up the patterns just one cuts this from 20% down to 2.1%.
>
> Incidently, with this patch we are back at 1.3 speed:
Cool!
How about scrolling speed?
Alfredo
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 06:38:37PM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> Setting up the patterns just one cuts this from 20% down to 2.1%.
Incidently, with this patch we are back at 1.3 speed:
# time lyx13 -x 'command-sequence file-open UserGuide-1.3.lyx ; lyx-quit;'
real0m0.961s
user0m0.780s
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 06:34:54PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> So 'lyx::support::ReplaceEnvironmentPath' curently wastes about
> Andre> 20% of the time used by lyx startup + UserGuide loading.
>
> Andre> This does not
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> So 'lyx::support::ReplaceEnvironmentPath' curently wastes about
Andre> 20% of the time used by lyx startup + UserGuide loading.
Andre> This does not seem right.
Indeed.
Andre> Does anybody feel a bit guilty?
Could you show us th
Currently, some regexp stuff is on top of the list:
0.000.00 1/402 boost::reg_expression, std::allocator >::reg_expression[in-charge](char
const*, u nsigned, std::allocator const&) [242]
0.000.00 3/402 boost::RegEx::SetExpression(char const*,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 05:15:51PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> I don't think that this is initialised in the c-tor.
> Index: lyxrow.h
> ===
> /// cached y position
> -unsigned int y_;
> +
Andre Poenitz wrote:
I don't think that this is initialised in the c-tor.
Index: lyxrow.h
===
/// cached y position
-unsigned int y_;
+unsigned int y_offset_;
Nor this:
> Index: paragraph.h
>
See attached.
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Index: lyxcursor.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 05:46:48PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Ok. When loading the UserGuide this change alone reduces
> | LyXText::getRowNearY share from 31.6 to 3.4 percent.
> >
> | So this is a speedup of 10 for this function translating
> | to more than 20% total speed gain.
>
> do
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 05:31:13PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> How about multiple windows/views ?
This is well below rank 10 on _my_ imaginary list implementation-wise,
but's a nice-to-have as concept...
Andre'
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:31:29PM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
>> Currently most time (currently compiling with -pg to get hard numbers)
>> is spend in accessing the row's y cache. If this is changed to a
>> per-paragraph y cache and a row-y offset in t
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 05:31:13PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> How about multiple windows/views ?
Sure, if somebody does a top twenty ...
The others are all more important IMHO, I even have arguments for them
regards
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, th
Dekel Tsur wrote:
> How about multiple windows/views ?
Things seem to be slowly evolving towards that too. The frontend code
is pretty well there, as indeed is the code in all the src
subdirectories. Only the code in src itself stands in the way, but
the current core clean-up is looking very pr
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 05:26:36PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Are you sure the linking (etc) in tex2lyx is -j safe?
No. But this is a missing file, and the resulting binary /does/ depend
upon the individual .o files, no ?
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the s
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:31:29PM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> Currently most time (currently compiling with -pg to get hard numbers)
> is spend in accessing the row's y cache. If this is changed to a
> per-paragraph y cache and a row-y offset in that paragraph we should see
> a speed up in the
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:37:07PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> | could it be because I'm building with 'make -j 5' ?
>>
>> Yes. I think it could.
>
| I don't think so, I can build just fine with -j3
Are you sure the linking (etc) in tex2lyx is
On Thursday 16 October 2003 16:22, John Levon wrote:
> > And no complaints since then.
>
> Because nobody is using 1.4cvs. Believe me, there will be complaints at
> release time ;)
I guess I should change my name to nobody. So this makes me the users that
runs apache & company? ;-)
I'm using
On Thursday 16 October 2003 15:35, John Levon wrote:
> > BTW, what is #1 in the must-have list?
>
> Let's see if somebody can guess :) It's not hard ...
I am dumb, what else? :-)
Thanks to André for elucidating me. :-)
> john
--
José Abílio
LyX and docbook, a perfect match. :-)
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:22:07PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> Here's the full top ten (that I just made up).
>
> 1. Character styles
> 2. Unicode support
> 3. Outliner
> 4. Document .layout wizard
> 5. Decent support for including code (including GUI labels + xrefs etc.)
> 6. Context menus and
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:36:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> | I believe I informed you of this a while ago :)
>>
>> And no complaints since then.
>
| Because nobody is using 1.4cvs. Believe me, there will be complaints at
| release time ;)
O
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:04:43PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | Any documents in a different encoding won't be in ASCII though :)
>
> | But Jos?© said it was easy to handle, so...
>
> Hmm... but he has to read most of the lyx file header to find out what
> language is it written in and w
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 05:24:30PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> So you just waited for a decent answer and decided to build your list
> around that?
Nah, not quite, 1. and 2. have been brewing in my mind for a while
now.
> Any of these not mentioned int he list on lyx.devel?
Nope, it's
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:42:45PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> character styles?
>
| You win ! With honorable mention to André for getting the underlyig
| motivation correct.
>
| Here's the full top ten (that I just made up).
So you just waited for a
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:37:07PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | could it be because I'm building with 'make -j 5' ?
>
> Yes. I think it could.
I don't think so, I can build just fine with -j3
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is ove
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:36:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | I believe I informed you of this a while ago :)
>
> And no complaints since then.
Because nobody is using 1.4cvs. Believe me, there will be complaints at
release time ;)
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made t
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:42:45PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> character styles?
You win ! With honorable mention to André for getting the underlyig
motivation correct.
Here's the full top ten (that I just made up).
1. Character styles
2. Unicode support
3. Outliner
4. Document .layout wizar
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:38:26PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> Your list?
>>
>> qt support
>
| Don't we already have that :)
I thought you crossed that one out, and am are now finished with your
tasks :-)
--
Lgb
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:38:26PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Your list?
>
> qt support
Don't we already have that :)
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Just before I rush off, here's the latest error :-)
>
| echo timestamp > screen.lo
| /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=link g++ -g -O -fno-exceptions -W -Wall -o
| libfrontends.la Alert.lo Dialogs.lo LyXView.lo Painter.lo Timeout.lo
| Toolbar.l
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> So the question is: ``do we really want to do that?''. What I mean is
> that nobody has complained yet that we lack an option to set alignment
> to default.
I should have complain, sorry ;-)
> What we do (or should be doing) currently is to cons
John Levon wrote:
>> BTW, what is #1 in the must-have list?
> Let's see if somebody can guess :) It's not hard ...
Let's start the ball rolling then...
character styles?
--
Angus
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:27:00PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
>
>> BTW, what is #1 in the must-have list?
>
| Let's see if somebody can guess :) It's not hard ...
Your list?
qt support
--
Lgb
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:19:30PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> | Nope, lars changed it so that it won't error at configure time.
>>
>> But it should error at end of configure, and should disable the qt
>> build.
>
| I believe I informed you of t
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:27:00PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
> BTW, what is #1 in the must-have list?
Let's see if somebody can guess :) It's not hard ...
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:27:00PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
> BTW, what is #1 in the must-have list?
World domination?
Andre'
On Thursday 16 October 2003 15:04, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> |
> | Any documents in a different encoding won't be in ASCII though :)
> |
> | But José said it was easy to handle, so...
>
> Hmm... but he has to read most of the lyx file header to find out what
> language is it written in and whet
Just before I rush off, here's the latest error :-)
echo timestamp > screen.lo
/bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=link g++ -g -O -fno-exceptions -W -Wall -o
libfrontends.la Alert.lo Dialogs.lo LyXView.lo Painter.lo Timeout.lo
Toolbar.lo guiapi.lo screen.lo
mkdir .libs
rm -fr .libs/libfrontends.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:18:23PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> This is with a P-III 1000Mhz. (lot of memory, but a laptop so the
> io-subsystem is really bad..)
>
> time ./src/lyx -x 'lyx-quit ;'
>
> real0m0.853s
> user0m0.460s
> sys 0m0.020s
>
>
> time ./src/lyx -x 'command
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:19:30PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | Nope, lars changed it so that it won't error at configure time.
>
> But it should error at end of configure, and should disable the qt
> build.
I believe I informed you of this a while ago :)
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If th
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:05:40PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
>
>> Shouldn't it say something after 'Qt Frontend' and 'Qt version' ?
>
| Nope, lars changed it so that it won't error at configure time.
But it should error at end of configure, and s
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:05:40PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
>
> > Shouldn't it say something after 'Qt Frontend' and 'Qt version' ?
>
> Nope, lars changed it so that it won't error at configure time.
>
It's better to get loads of errors when l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| | On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 12:14:58PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
>>> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>>
>>> > I'd really like to know, how slow does a computer need to be befor
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:05:40PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
> Shouldn't it say something after 'Qt Frontend' and 'Qt version' ?
Nope, lars changed it so that it won't error at configure time.
regards
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the threa
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:05:40PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Ok... I had another problem since QTDIR=/usr/lib/qt3-gcc2.96...
>
> I have no idea where this variable is set though..., but I really
> think the ./configure script should protest in this case. (It didn't
> and I got loads
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:51:22PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> I was hoping that we would be able to do this for 1.4, but I think we
>> should wait for 1.5. Reading and writing utf-8 is the what we should
>> do first imho, especially since standa
Ok... I had another problem since QTDIR=/usr/lib/qt3-gcc2.96...
I have no idea where this variable is set though..., but I really
think the ./configure script should protest in this case. (It didn't
and I got loads of linking errors).
Here's the result of configuration (with QTDIR set):
Config
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:51:22PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> I was hoping that we would be able to do this for 1.4, but I think we
> should wait for 1.5. Reading and writing utf-8 is the what we should
> do first imho, especially since standard ASCII is utf-8 good as any.
Any documents
Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> | You have to update to gcc 3.x
>>
>> Or use STLport.
>>
>> Actually it is possible to get this working with gcc 2.95.x as well,
>> but a lot of non-nice hacking must be done. And I really ho
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:36:36PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:26:34PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> >> A unicoded lyx would solve the latter nicely.
> >
> | What prevents us currently from going to unicode?
>
> Me. W
On Thursday 16 October 2003 14:41, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:30:24PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > A unicoded lyx would solve the latter nicely.
> >
> > What prevents us currently from going to unicode?
>
> This is probably incomplete.
[...]
> o lyx2lyx support for snooping
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| o the ability to read in and write out UTF-8 encoded .lyx files
I was hoping that we would be able to do this for 1.4, but I think we
should wait for 1.5. Reading and writing utf-8 is the what we should
do first imho, especially since standard ASCII is utf
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | You have to update to gcc 3.x
>
> Or use STLport.
>
> Actually it is possible to get this working with gcc 2.95.x as well,
> but a lot of non-nice hacking must be done. And I really hoped that we
> could avoid that now.
>
Just a note. The REA
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:30:24PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > A unicoded lyx would solve the latter nicely.
>
> What prevents us currently from going to unicode?
This is probably incomplete.
o moving chartype to the agreed upon (I think ?) 32-bit value
o deciding whether wstring is really
Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:53:52PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
>> > I'll try with a later version of gcc to keep going.
>>
>> Linking files might be faster...
>
| Que? Anyway, I've already
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:26:34PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>> A unicoded lyx would solve the latter nicely.
>
| What prevents us currently from going to unicode?
Me. We are not doing that now. Let's wait for 1.5 with that.
--
Lgb
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| John Levon wrote:
>>> Add #include to debugstream.h before the #include
>>> nullstream call? Might be interesting to ascertain why it fails for
>>> you and not for others...
>>
>> It failed for me with gcc 2.96 on my IA64 box too
>
| I think it is all
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:26:34PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> A unicoded lyx would solve the latter nicely.
What prevents us currently from going to unicode?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferso
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:52:55PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I think it is all a function of the grossly non-standard stream
> classes shipped with gcc < 3. There are stream classes in support
> that I'd expect are there for just this reason. Do they help?
Maybe (sorry the box is down right
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:23:07PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> The tree is in a state were such work won't get lost.
All the tough stuff has been lost already, I think - that is, the tricky
things concerning insets, cut and paste, tables, etc. are broken to the
extent they need re-doing altog
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:55:03PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Were it to work as you suggest, would it also enable russians to type
> latin or greek also? That's the same problem isn't it?
Nope ! There are three things related to this :
1) entering the character. X has locale-specific compos
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:06:18PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Finally, I feel I'd be wasting my time on the CVS HEAD tree given the
> state it's in, and backporting stuff is tedious and distinctly un-fun
> work.
>
> So yeah, I am. I might get round to fixing change tracking if the tree
> recovers,
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| So yeah, I am. I might get round to fixing change tracking if the tree
| recovers, though.
:-) so I won't remove the non-working cruft for some time yet then.
--
Lgb
John Levon wrote:
>> Add #include to debugstream.h before the #include
>> nullstream call? Might be interesting to ascertain why it fails for
>> you and not for others...
>
> It failed for me with gcc 2.96 on my IA64 box too
I think it is all a function of the grossly non-standard stream
class
John Levon wrote:
>> > "Fix exact match for raw mode fonts."
>> >
>> > This may relate to the problem of using latex-xft-fonts in
>> > locales such
>> > as ru_RU.UTF-8. Testers needed ... I forget if we still try a
>> > rawMode load or not...
>>
>> Could you expand a little for the non-initiated
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:33:20PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
>
>> and eventually got this error:
>>
>> ../../../boost/boost/test/detail/nullstream.hpp:20:48: ostream: No such file or
>> directory
>> ../../../boost/boost/test/detail/nullstream.hp
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:03:24PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Me too
AOL. I've already been cancelling a few "sends" recently, I'll try to do
so more often ;)
Apologies to anybody I've annoyed.
regards
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:37:46PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I don't know, I've long since lost track ...
>
> Incidentally, what is your current interest level? I have the feeling
> that you're easing down to 'observer status'.
Well I hope I can put this without pissing anybody off in th
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:02:42PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:53:52PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > > I'll try with a later version of gcc to keep going.
> >
> > Linking files might be faster...
>
> Q
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:53:52PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > I'll try with a later version of gcc to keep going.
>
> Linking files might be faster...
Que? Anyway, I've already started the process using gcc 3.2.3
/Christian
--
Ph.D. Ch
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:46:55PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>
> | I just tire of being at the receiving end. (mostly).
>
> I'll try to be more civil, and to not come with unwarranted
> accusations.
Me too
Andre'
John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:09:41PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> Note that he says it used to work fine with an earlier version of
>> Qt-LyX. Has Qt's handling of such things changed since Qt 3.1?
>
> I don't know, I've long since lost track ...
Incidentally, what is your
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| I just tire of being at the receiving end. (mostly).
I'll try to be more civil, and to not come with unwarranted
accusations.
--
Lgb
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:53:52PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> I'll try with a later version of gcc to keep going.
Linking files might be faster...
Andre'
>
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jeffe
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:33:20PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > I used these commands
> >
> > rm -rf build-qt
> > cvs update -d
> > ./autogen.sh
> > cd build-qt
> > ../configure --with-version-suffix --prefix=$LYXPREFIX
> > --disabl
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:44:09PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:40:08PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Add #include to debugstream.h before the #include
> > nullstream call? Might be interesting to ascertain why it fails for
> > you and not for others...
>
> It fail
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:40:08PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > How do I fix it?
>
> Add #include to debugstream.h before the #include
> nullstream call? Might be interesting to ascertain why it fails for
> you and not for others...
It looks like the header is
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:33:20PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> I used these commands
>
> rm -rf build-qt
> cvs update -d
> ./autogen.sh
> cd build-qt
> ../configure --with-version-suffix --prefix=$LYXPREFIX
>--disable-libtool-lock --with-frontend=qt
> make
>
> and eventual
John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:33:20PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m
> wrote:
>
>> and eventually got this error:
>>
>> ../../../boost/boost/test/detail/nullstream.hpp:20:48: ostream: No
>> such file or directory
>> ../../../boost/boost/test/detail/nullstream.hpp:21:50: streambuf:
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
