On Monday 22 September 2003 2:39 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> %% Do command #1 if file #2 exists, else print a warning
> \newcommand{\DoOrWarn}[2]{
> \IfFileExists{#2}{#1{#2}}{\warnNotFound{#2}}
> }
Guess what? I got greedy!
I'm trying to write a design document describing how to implement
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> BTW is there a 'cvs subtract' to cancel a 'cvs add'?
No, but if you open CVS/Entries in the appropriate dir, find the file
you've added and remove that line, then who's to know ;-)
(Ie, cvs add is just a local command. No change to the repository at all.)
--
Angus
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 05:10:59PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes spake thusly:
...
> Martin> OK, so minipage must be provided at least.
>
> ... and in a way that replaces the minipage inset.
...
> The corrections for oval box seem even worse. Concerning oval box, we
> have to wonder: do we
On Monday 22 September 2003 8:01 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:18:08PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> > shrug. Fair enough. If the container is complaining that it needs
> > LyXFont, then maybe we should believe it. Perhaps paragraph_pimpl.h
> > itself is inconsistent
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:18:08PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> shrug. Fair enough. If the container is complaining that it needs LyXFont,
> then maybe we should believe it. Perhaps paragraph_pimpl.h itself is
> inconsistent on your box. Ie, it wouldn't compile on its own.
>
> I attach
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 07:07:53PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
>
>> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> > Attached my patch (did I get it right?) and the error output.
>>
>> Almost ;-)
>>
>> What I meant when I said the original was nasty was that it was a
>> fragile soluti
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 07:07:53PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Attached my patch (did I get it right?) and the error output.
>
> Almost ;-)
>
> What I meant when I said the original was nasty was that it was a fragile
> solution. The code compiled if you pos
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Attached my patch (did I get it right?) and the error output.
Almost ;-)
What I meant when I said the original was nasty was that it was a fragile
solution. The code compiled if you positioned #include "lyxfont.h" in
paragraph.C in one position and not if it were positi
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | Lars, I reckon that this is your chance to do some evangelizing on
>> | LyX's behalf...
>>
>> I'll leave the honours for you.
>
| Nah. You're the guy at the top of the tr
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 06:13:52PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
...
> > Attached.
>
> Ahh. Then we need a destructor to Paragraph::Pimpl that is defined out of line
> I think. No need for Paragraph itself to know anything about this. Try:
>
> paragraph_pimpl.h:
> struct Paragraph::Pimpl
On Monday 22 September 2003 5:24 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 04:56:04PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> > On Monday 22 September 2003 3:36 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > Angus, I still need lyxfont.h in paragraph and paragraph_pimpl as
> > > follows:
> >
> > The fix is
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 04:56:04PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> On Monday 22 September 2003 3:36 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Angus, I still need lyxfont.h in paragraph and paragraph_pimpl as
> > follows:
>
> The fix is really nasty (read fragile). Especially the position-dependence in
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Anyway, appended is the patch for your graceful decision. The
Juergen> Extended patch you have should also apply to the 1.3 branch,
Juergen> I guess.
Thanks. I applied both.
JMarc
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Lars, I reckon that this is your chance to do some evangelizing on
> | LyX's behalf...
>
> I'll leave the honours for you.
Nah. You're the guy at the top of the tree.
--
Angus
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> OK, so minipage must be provided at least.
>> ... and in a way that replaces the minipage inset.
Martin> Eventually, why not.
I think this is something that we have to do to keep the UI coherent.
>> You want to make sure t
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars, I reckon that this is your chance to do some evangelizing on LyX's
| behalf...
I'll leave the honours for you.
--
Lgb
Lars, I reckon that this is your chance to do some evangelizing on LyX's
behalf...
RE: BoostBook
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/25474
--
Angus
On Monday 22 September 2003 3:36 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Angus, I still need lyxfont.h in paragraph and paragraph_pimpl as
> follows:
The fix is really nasty (read fragile). Especially the position-dependence in
paragraph.C. Could we dig a little deeper first and ascertain what exactly is
go
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 05:22:09PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
>
> In fact I'd think something along the lines of
>
> \usepackage{fancybox}
> \usepackage{calc}
>
> \par\fbox{\parbox{\columnwidth-2\fboxsep-2\fboxrule}{}}
> \par\ovalbox{\parbox{\columnwidth-2\fboxsep-0.8pt}{}}
>
>
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 04:13:18PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Getting better all the time... see attached.
>
> and why are you blaming me for your code ?
> + * \author Angus Leeming
>
> --
> Angus
One day you'll be grateful ;-)
Okay, okay, ...
- M
pgp0
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 05:10:59PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes spake thusly:
>
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Could also be fixed width or 'twice the natural size of this text'
> >> (like latex2e allows) or 'make the box square'...
>
> Martin> Sure. Some e
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 05:08:16PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:53:54PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
> > What's the real world problem you are currently trying to solve?
>
> The one the (tested, working) solution of which is the following:
>
> (lyx_sty.C)
>
> s
Angus, I still need lyxfont.h in paragraph and paragraph_pimpl as
follows:
Index: paragraph.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/paragraph.C,v
retrieving revision 1.326
diff -u -p -r1.326 paragraph.C
--- paragraph.C 2
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Getting better all the time... see attached.
and why are you blaming me for your code ?
+ * \author Angus Leeming
--
Angus
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Could also be fixed width or 'twice the natural size of this text'
>> (like latex2e allows) or 'make the box square'...
Martin> Sure. Some easy, some not so easy. But ask the UI folks first
Martin> :-)
Those are chosen to be easy e
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 04:10:42PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes spake thusly:
>
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> - set a width (which could be columnwidth)
>
> Martin> The two most popular widths will be (corrected) \columnwidth
> Martin> and "adaptive" (i.e.,
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 10:24:30AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote: I think we should start backporting stuff to 1.3.x
>> What stuff are you thinking about?
John> I'm not sure yet. At least some of the Qt dialog cleanups are
Jo
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I did it.
Merci beaucoup!
> Concerning 1.3.3, if you are confident that you will not to
> make incompatible changes as the class matures (the risk seems low and
> adding new stuff later is OK), then I would accept a patch for 1.3.3.
> We could also decide to wait a
On Monday 22 September 2003 2:39 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> Guys, the attached file works well enough, but it's rather
> Angus> inelegant. I have defined a macro, so:
>
> Angus, I am not sure what was the concusion of this
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Guys, the attached file works well enough, but it's rather
Angus> inelegant. I have defined a macro, so:
Angus, I am not sure what was the concusion of this thread, but let me
propose a \DoOrWarn variant:
%% Do command #1 if file
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> As far as the code reduction is concerned these are a few dozens of
>> lines of trivial code, which do not cause any maintainance
>> headache, as far as I remember...
Angus> Well, apart from the fact that I have just spent 10 hours
Ang
> "Hartmut" == Hartmut Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hartmut> There is no ijmpd.lyx template yet.
Oops! My fault. The file is present on the 1.2.x branch, but I forgot
to propagate it. This is fixed now.
Thanks.
JMarc
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>> I have set up a first version of a layout file for Peter Wilson's
>> memoir class.
Juergen> OK, André has commited this to 1.4. Can someone with lyxdoc
Juergen> write access please commit t
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> - set a width (which could be columnwidth)
Martin> The two most popular widths will be (corrected) \columnwidth
Martin> and "adaptive" (i.e., don't put a parbox inside the fbox). I
Martin> was considering at least having that in the
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:33:47PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes spake thusly:
>
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> This patch adds support for rectangular frames containing one
> Martin> or more paragraphs of text, at the width of the column, using
> Martin>
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:53:54PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 01:50:30PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > How about a Preamble dialog (or pane) that displayed the stuff that LyX was
> > auto-inserting too. These lines would be displayed in a different colour
> >
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 09:30:02AM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote:
> Obviously it's not. About the only seriously good thing about TeX, actually a
> thing that has been kept broken for ages by designers of onscreen and printed
> renderings in Windows and typical X-based systems, is that dimensions are
>
> > Uhm, OK, so you're really looking at reimplementing something that gives
> > you TeX power yet is more sane to use.
>
> Well, I am not. I am just not calling TeX (the language, not the
> typesetting as such) 'the best thing since sliced bread'...
Obviously it's not. About the only seriously go
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:51:20AM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote:
> > That's the problem. The whole idea of the digestive tract is broken in
> > my not so humble opinion.
>
> Uhm, OK, so you're really looking at reimplementing something that gives you
> TeX power yet is more sane to use.
Well, I am not
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 01:50:30PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> How about a Preamble dialog (or pane) that displayed the stuff that LyX was
> auto-inserting too. These lines would be displayed in a different colour
> and could not be deleted. However, if the user hit the 'Return' button
> when
> > But seriously, if you can think of improvements and how to implement
> > them in terms of what's written in the bible (The TexBook), esp. wrt
> > the TeX's digestive tract structure which should remain intact -- I'd
> > love to hear it.
>
> That's the problem. The whole idea of the digestive tr
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I am not sure that we will be easy to do this in a clean way. I fear
> that for some people, the thing you think should be before user
> preamble should actually be another place for their usage pattern. We
> should try to get these things as straightforward as possibl
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> On Monday 22 September 2003 12:16 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> About the LaTeX stuff here BTW I noticed one unfortunate thing. If
>> you try to redefine fboxsep in the preamble, it ends up after the
>> fboxwidth definition... should
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> This patch adds support for rectangular frames containing one
Martin> or more paragraphs of text, at the width of the column, using
Martin> the Note infrastructure.
Why hardcoding the width?? Not everybody wants to to have boxen
On Monday 22 September 2003 12:16 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> About the LaTeX stuff here BTW I noticed one unfortunate thing. If you
> try to redefine fboxsep in the preamble, it ends up after the fboxwidth
> definition... should I make that rather a newcommand? Then it is
> called from the inset i
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Colorbox would be nice too, but I want to see first what
> Jürgen has in mind for character colours (i.e., general LaTeX colours
> support.)
Don't hold your breath, Martin. Although I have submitted my PH.D. thesis few
weeks ago, I am already snowed with real work :-(
Jue
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:12:46PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
>
> On Monday 22 September 2003 10:37 am, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:42:04PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> > > Returning to nit-picking mode:
> >
> > Do I infer correctly that
> > discussion-in-p
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:50:06PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> My apologies. Incidentally, I really like my idea of a whats_new_1_4_x.lyx
> that is clickable from splash.lyx which in turn pops up automatically the
> first time the user uses the newly installed version.
So do I.
> How about "
John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:17:27PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> * lyx-doc; effectively dead, or at least showing no signs of life.
>
> This is perhaps a little unfair ... current CVS is now relatively up to
> date.
>
> OK, so there's no maintainership as such, but ... li
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> If I see a lot of people wanting to contribute to the docs then I'll
>> change it.
>>
>> Or are you feeling left out?
>
| Not at all. A bit guilty maybe. Given the number of users asking questions
| about graphics...
>
| I
Angus Leeming wrote:
> How about XFIG? Well, I admit that I have no idea how to rotate an XFIG
> image with LaTeX text. I have tried \rotatebox,
>
> \usepackage{rotating}
> \begin{sideways}\include{my_figure.pstex_t}\end{sideways}
>
> I even tried wrapping it in a minipage.
>
> In all cases, th
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:17:27PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> * lyx-doc; effectively dead, or at least showing no signs of life.
This is perhaps a little unfair ... current CVS is now relatively up to
date.
OK, so there's no maintainership as such, but ... little tweaks go a
long way
regards
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> If I see a lot of people wanting to contribute to the docs then I'll
> change it.
>
> Or are you feeling left out?
Not at all. A bit guilty maybe. Given the number of users asking questions
about graphics...
I also note that we have three separate documentation effo
On Monday 22 September 2003 10:37 am, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:42:04PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> > Returning to nit-picking mode:
>
> Do I infer correctly that
> discussion-in-principle-whether-this-is-a-good-idea-at-all-mode has
> been turned off?
Support for
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
>> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>>> I have set up a first version of a layout file for Peter Wilson's memoir
>>> class.
>>
>> OK, André has committed this to 1.4. Can someone with lyxdoc write access
>> please commit the pat
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:24:11AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:46:29AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > > No, this latest patch fixes it and the first one did not introduce it.
> >
> > Hmm, then what am I left with to complain about !
>
> Maybe you could just complain ab
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:42:04PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
>
> Returning to nit-picking mode:
Do I infer correctly that
discussion-in-principle-whether-this-is-a-good-idea-at-all-mode has
been turned off?
Anyway, new version. Only the ControlBox/FormBox stuff still missing,
but should
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>> I have set up a first version of a layout file for Peter Wilson's memoir
>> class.
>
> OK, André has committed this to 1.4. Can someone with lyxdoc write access
> please commit the patch to Extended.lyx (memoir-doc.diff)?
Just a though
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> I have set up a first version of a layout file for Peter Wilson's memoir
> class.
OK, André has commited this to 1.4. Can someone with lyxdoc write access
please commit the patch to Extended.lyx (memoir-doc.diff)?
Thanks,
Juergen.
I've been trying to get a feel for what would be needed to "transform"
InsetExternal.
First, what do we do with InsetGraphics? LaTeX export from InsetGraphics
makes use of the graphicx package, which regards all these transformations
as options to the \includegraphics call. Here is what we supp
Hi folks,
Trying to get an update po file to be translated using (as README said):
$ make eu.pox
doesn't work. It said:
"make: *** No rule to make target 'eu.pox'. Stop."
Trying another (perhaps old) way:
cd po;
cp POTFILES.in ../; cd ../
xgettext --default-domain=luyx --add-comments -
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:58:54AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>> | I couldn't care less. Talk to my compiler ;-)
>>
>> I think it is too old and grumpy. You should upgrade.
>
| Btw when will L
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:58:54AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> | I couldn't care less. Talk to my compiler ;-)
>
> I think it is too old and grumpy. You should upgrade.
Btw when will Lgb 2.0 ship?
The one we have now is certainly too old
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 09:31:58AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > I don't know. Is there some way of making the Chapter/Section numbering
> > global to the document instead of local to the insets? I really don't
> > know the code, so I'm just tossing out ideas.
>
> Hmmm. LyX kernel experts? What
Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi,
>
| just for the curious ones: What are/were pseudo actions?
All lyx functions (LFUN) has assigned a hardcoded number. This number
is used for running a specific action.
A pseudo action is a combination of an LFUN and its arguments, and a
number
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:46:29AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > No, this latest patch fixes it and the first one did not introduce it.
>
> Hmm, then what am I left with to complain about !
Maybe you could just complain about nothing being left to complain
about...
[Although this is a thing I'd c
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 12:00:39PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> The attached patch uses the new counter code to finally add KOMA's addchap and
> addsec to the navigation menu. Furthermore, it fixes the order of Inputs.
> André's change has broken the font redefinition (i.e., Chapter*, Add
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 01:46:35PM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote:
> I guess if you play pipe organs you can pay Prof. Knuth an
> unannounced visit :)
I don't.
> But seriously, if you can think of improvements and how to implement
> them in terms of what's written in the bible (The TexBook), esp. wrt
> t
Hi,
just for the curious ones: What are/were pseudo actions?
Michael
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:34:25AM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> On Monday 22 September 2003 6:26 am, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > Question. Why doesn't InsetBoxMailer::string2params set the "type"
> >
> > It does... Hmmm. Could this be simplified? Yes! Like this
> >
> > case LFUN_INSET_M
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:58:54AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> | I couldn't care less. Talk to my compiler ;-)
>
> I think it is too old and grumpy. You should upgrade.
>
> --
> Lgb
Yeah yeah yeah. Carthago est delendam.
On Monday 22 September 2003 6:26 am, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Question. Why doesn't InsetBoxMailer::string2params set the "type"
>
> It does... Hmmm. Could this be simplified? Yes! Like this
>
> case LFUN_INSET_MODIFY: {
> InsetNoteMailer::string2params(cmd.argument, params_);
>
72 matches
Mail list logo
