If the ChangeLogs are any indication, this probably started with Angus
on Aug 21.
It severly impacts scrolling thru a doc.
Every time a grapic is loaded the cursor jumps to the the top of the
document.
Garst
> Until recently I was inclined to think that they would as it does not
> make much business sense to shut up OSS unless you are MicroSoft, so
> nobody would wield software patents against OSS. But SCO managesd to
> prove the contrary...
C'mon, you should know better than that ;D
SCO's rambling
Thanks, Martin. The patch works.
I'm liking the "branches" idea. With lyx-xforms:
1) There should be more visual feedback. Right now a branch shows up with
a generic "Label" inside a gray box. It should probably show something
like "Branch: YourBranchName" instead.
2) The branch background
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 03:51:02PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> The attached patch does that. Just proof of principle.
Can't work, .x and .y are not always set for INSET_EDIT. Basically it's
used for two different things, but nobody told the insets. Bit of a
mess...
You'd have to add some spec
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 04:41:16PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 03:32:17PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 04:15:10PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> > > Ok. I think this is easily fixed by introducing the notion of a
> > > 'sensitive part'
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 03:50:09PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> http://www.gimp.org/ has taken a firm stand against this EU proposal.
Please note that the vote has been delayed until the 22nd Sept or Oct
8th.
So right now there's not much point, we should wait for further
developments.
regards
j
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 09:47:15AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Index: FormDocument.C
> | ===
> | RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/frontends/xforms/FormDo
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | http://www.gimp.org/ has taken a firm stand against this EU proposal.
> >
> | How about LyX?
>
> But sure I am aganst patenting software (and ideas).
Close it.. ever since I saw the patent for rocking
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:15:50AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Friday 29 August 2003 08:51, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >>
> >> But sure I am aganst patenting software (and ideas).
> >>
> >> Others?
> >
> | I am also against the patent
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> But... should we do it or not?
If I have a vote, it's yes.
Alfredo
"Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Friday 29 August 2003 08:51, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> But sure I am aganst patenting software (and ideas).
>>
>> Others?
>
| I am also against the patent of software, and ideas, for that matter, on
| philosophical and practical grounds.
>
|
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 09:51:27AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | http://www.gimp.org/ has taken a firm stand against this EU proposal.
> >
> | How about LyX?
>
> I do not know really.
>
> But how is the new legislation different from what is alr
On Friday 29 August 2003 08:51, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> But sure I am aganst patenting software (and ideas).
>
> Others?
I am also against the patent of software, and ideas, for that matter, on
philosophical and practical grounds.
The practical side is that the Patent Offices don't ha
Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| http://www.gimp.org/ has taken a firm stand against this EU proposal.
>
| How about LyX?
I do not know really.
But how is the new legislation different from what is already in
effect in the USA? Free Software trives there?
But sure I am aganst patenting
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 09:19:31AM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> >> NestInset include 0 or more cells then?
> >
> > No, 1 or more.
>
> Ok. So InsetGraphic (the one without caption) doesn't.
Sorry, I mixed it up with the figure float.
> So now you don't want a pla
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Index: FormDocument.C
| ===
| RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/frontends/xforms/FormDocument.C,v
| retrieving revision 1.151
| diff -u -p -r1.151 FormDocument.C
| --- FormDocu
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> NestInset include 0 or more cells then?
>
> No, 1 or more.
Ok. So InsetGraphic (the one without caption) doesn't.
>> > Collapsable, Tabular, Graphics, OptArg, Environment etc simply derive
>> > from NestInset.
>>
>> So *all* insets derive from NestInset?
>
> No. Only
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:47:16AM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> >> So you reimplement insetgraphics?
> >
> > There is nothing to 'reimplement', just a bit to shuffle around.
> >
> > InsetText would mutate into a 'ParBox'/'Cell' and leaves the inset
> > hierarchy.
>
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:08:36AM +0300, Martin Vermeer spake thusly:
>
> > Latest CVS.
> >
> > 1) lyx somenewfile.lyx
> > 2) Document->Settings
> > 3) crash.
> >
> > Waiting for debug compile to finish so I can give a meaningful backtrace...
> >
> > This is lyx-xforms. Crash happens on Linux
http://www.gimp.org/ has taken a firm stand against this EU proposal.
How about LyX?
R.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:01:38PM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan spake thusly:
> Latest CVS.
>
> 1) lyx somenewfile.lyx
> 2) Document->Settings
> 3) crash.
>
> Waiting for debug compile to finish so I can give a meaningful backtrace...
>
> This is lyx-xforms. Crash happens on Linux, Cygwin, Solaris.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> So you reimplement insetgraphics?
>
> There is nothing to 'reimplement', just a bit to shuffle around.
>
> InsetText would mutate into a 'ParBox'/'Cell' and leaves the inset
> hierarchy.
>
> A new 'NestInset' is something that could have cells and implements
> basic curs
Latest CVS.
1) lyx somenewfile.lyx
2) Document->Settings
3) crash.
Waiting for debug compile to finish so I can give a meaningful backtrace...
This is lyx-xforms. Crash happens on Linux, Cygwin, Solaris.
--
Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids:
Sylvan Associat
23 matches
Mail list logo
