On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 08:19:55AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller spake thusly:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > - The "available" browser should be on the left.
> >
> > ...contrary to the FormCitation practice.
>
> which is a ui bug IMO (the citation layout), at least wrt left-to-right
> reading cul
Actually, it was Jose Matos's change (adding \end_layout).
Looks like lyx2lyx was not updated.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 11:24:56PM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> I have a "lyxformat 224" document.
>
> Opening with latest LyX, I get:
>
> "225: Format not supported" on the command line
>
> And
I have a "lyxformat 224" document.
Opening with latest LyX, I get:
"225: Format not supported" on the command line
And LyX pops up the message:
"The document is from an earlier version of LyX, but the lyx2lyx script
failed to convert it."
I recall someone (Angus?) just made a format change. Wh
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > - The "available" browser should be on the left.
>
> ...contrary to the FormCitation practice.
which is a ui bug IMO (the citation layout), at least wrt left-to-right
reading cultures.
> > - The buttons are too small ("Add" is "Hinzufügen" in german).
>
> ...and then th
Hello,
Is this possible to interface Lyx with some of the most popular text
editors (emacs/vim)?
Despite its functionality the Lyx's editor is far from allowing me the
same productivity as with the editor of my choice.
As Lyx is a good concept, maybe it is quite independant from
its graphical inte
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 10:54:38PM +0200, Braunstein Alfredo wrote:
> Can we just consider these inconsistencies as bugs? Really, I think that
> they all mean the same (cannot open file for writing). Am I right?
Hmm, indeed, sorry
john
I you do not want this patch to go in, you have to tell me within 30
seconds.
? src/check
? src/frontends/xforms/lyx_forms.h
? src/frontends/xforms/lyx_xpm.h
Index: src/Makefile.am
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/M
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 11:47:54PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> |
> | Is the following ok?
>
> this kindo looks right. so yes I think so.
>
> --
> Lgb
I will increment the file format also... and change lyx2lyx accordingly.
--
José Abílio Matos
LyX and docbook a perfect match
José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 10:39:54PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > \\end_layout should have an explicit test, not an inveted one. and it
| > should imho also give an error
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 10:39:54PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> \\end_layout should have an explicit test, not an inveted one. and it
> should imho also give an error message for the wrongly placed/not
> handled \\end_layout.
Is
too much beer really
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 22:52:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: Braunstein Alfredo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [patch] buffer
Today John Levon wrote:
>On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 09:58:50PM +0200, Braunstein Alfr
José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Index: src/buffer.C
| ===
| RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/buffer.C,v
| retrieving revision 1.499
| diff -u -r1.499 buffer.C
| --- src/buffer.C 26 Jul 2003
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 09:27:38PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> Hi,
>near follows a patch to add end_layout to the lyx file format.
>Comments?
Hmmm
> --
> José Abílio
--
José Abílio Matos
LyX and docbook a perfect match. :-)
? lib/doc/UserGuide-1.lyx
? lib/doc/UserG
Hi,
near follows a patch to add end_layout to the lyx file format.
Comments?
--
José Abílio
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 10:16:46PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Yes... that your InsetOld patch necessitated changes to my Branches
> | patch, nothing more.
> |
> | This Branches patch (biggish) is all I have pending here now, agai
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Yes... that your InsetOld patch necessitated changes to my Branches
| patch, nothing more.
|
| This Branches patch (biggish) is all I have pending here now, against
| cvs of this afternoon.
Ok, but let's wait with the brances patch until we get how fr
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 09:47:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 08:50:58PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
> | >
> | > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | >
> | > | (This contains the pa
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 08:50:58PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
| >
| > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | (This contains the patch. I'll separate it out if you
| > | prefer.)
| >
| >
| > I'd like fixes in a separate p
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 08:50:58PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | (This contains the patch. I'll separate it out if you
> | prefer.)
>
>
> I'd like fixes in a separate patch.
>
> memory and InsetOld fixes.
>
> --
> Lgb
h
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| (This contains the patch. I'll separate it out if you
| prefer.)
I'd like fixes in a separate patch.
memory and InsetOld fixes.
--
Lgb
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 06:13:36PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | You mean I should commit this patch? A one liner...
>
> Yes.
>
> --
> Lgb
Done as ordered :-)
Martin
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| You mean I should commit this patch? A one liner...
Yes.
--
Lgb
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 04:26:57PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller spake thusly:
...
> Almost perfect :-)
> A few nitpicks though:
> - The color choice should be removed completely.
> - The "available" browser should be on the left.
...contrary to the FormCitation practice.
> - The remove branch bu
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 04:56:23PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 06:53:09PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
> |
> | >
> | > Complain within two seconds or this patch goes in.
> |
> | I find it us
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 06:53:09PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
|
| >
| > Complain within two seconds or this patch goes in.
|
| I find it useful for compilability to add
|
| #include
Yes I know that is needed, strictly speaking.
Bu
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 06:53:09PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
>
> Complain within two seconds or this patch goes in.
I find it useful for compilability to add
#include
at least to insetbase.h.
gcc 2.95.2. Comments on its age are *not* appreciated :-)
>
> --
> Lgb
Ma
Asger Kunuk Alstrup wrote:
> I found the problem.
Cannot reproduce any crash now. Thanks.
Juergen.
27 matches
Mail list logo
