On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 12:24:38AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
> > It was thought too long.
>
> Then let me rephrase: any objection to me changing it to "Index" ?
>
I'd prefer keeping 'Idx' because it's shorter... or changing to
something even s
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, John Levon wrote:
> > What's QA? Quality-Assurance?
>
> Yep. That's me laughably enough :)
>
Oh, I don't know. You did catch me using the old menu references, i.e.
Layout->Paragraph instead of Edit->Paragraph Settings...
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 12:24:38AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | Index entries have this on their buttons. Any reason it doesn't use
> | English (such as "Index") ?
>
> It was thought too long.
Then let me rephrase: any objection to me changing it to "Index" ?
:)
john
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 11:08:36PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
> I think I'm confused by the term "apply"... I thought that meant using the
> 'patch'-command, i.e. applying the patch, but maybe it's something you do
It does mean that...
> What's QA? Quality-Assurance?
Yep. That's me l
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Index entries have this on their buttons. Any reason it doesn't use
| English (such as "Index") ?
It was thought too long.
--
Lgb
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
[Inset to display key binding dynamically based on command name]
> I even coded it up (2/3 years ago?), but for reasons I didn't quite
> understand it was dropped. (I was young then and lacked knowledge.)
If I remember correctly, I suggested this a long
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Why do we have this distinction? Performance? Proven?
If I remember correctly, it is just history. I added the comment
when I found out that it was basically the same.
If they are the same now, I'm sure you can just collapse them.
> // Gets the fully
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 09:47:48PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
>
>
> These look the same to me ;)
>
I think I'm confused by the term "apply"... I thought that meant using the
'patch'-command, i.e. applying the patch, but maybe it's something you
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Christian Ridderström wrote:
>
> I have no problems here building the xforms frontend. Try removing your
> xforms/.deps directory and running configure again.
>
Thanks, that fixed it.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström h
Thanks! Macros can change the game considerably, I see.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 10:21:17PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Would it be possible to create a user preference item that would cause
> > spellchecker to always review the entire
Hi.. I was trying to import a latex file using the Import -> Latex
option but it gave me an error and stopped. Here's the error:
Reading LaTeX command syntax
(SLIM-O_report00.tex: Splitting Preamble
Creating LyX preamble
Reading layout file
Cleaning... Expecting `$', got \end in `
' at /usr/local/
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Would it be possible to create a user preference item that would cause
> spellchecker to always review the entire document, instead of from the current
> cursor position to the end of the document?
What's wrong with a macro? See
http://ev-en
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 08:52:06PM +0100, John Levon spake thusly:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 09:48:18PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
>
> > Is bugzilla down?
>
> Seems so
>
> john
...and www.lyx.org is down, and cvs has forgotten my password...
perhaps because NIS is down too.
Martin
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 09:48:18PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
> Is bugzilla down?
Seems so
john
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 09:47:48PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
> Lgb: Mark it as fixed, then the QA dude (John probably) will confirm it
> as fixed.
It has to be applied before it can be marked as fixed.
> John: Wait for somebody (that is, me) to review and apply it
>
> Angus:
Is bugzilla down?
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Christian Ridderström wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I've sent a patch to lyx-docs (this was a documentation bug), see
> >
> > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=996
> >
> > I wanted to add tooltips but noticed that they were already there in Qt
> > and
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 11:48:14AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How going from the current cursor position to the end, asking whether to
> "continue from beginning?", then continuing until back to where you started.
Wrapping round might make some sense. Undecided ...
regards
john
How going from the current cursor position to the end, asking whether to
"continue from beginning?", then continuing until back to where you started.
That's the typical behavior of word processors, I believe.
Is that where LyX is headed?
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 06:19:13PM +0100, John Levon wro
Just to show the difference between compiler versions and to show that
gcc is moving in the right direction. Note also that 3.3 and 3.4 are a
lot more C++ correct in regard to the C++ standard than 3.2 (but 3.2
is pretty good as well.)
version sizels -l compile time
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Ok, that (sort of) explains why I have four more options in my
> 1.3.2-xforms version then? This means the documentation should say
> something like:
>
> To modify the preamble open Layout->Premable (Xforms-version) or
> open Layout->Document->Preamble
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Ok, that (sort of) explains why I have four more options in my
> 1.3.2-xforms version then? This means the documentation should say
> something like:
>
> To modify the preamble open Layout->Premable (Xforms-version) or
> open Layout->Document->Preamble
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 09:03:31AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Would it be possible to create a user preference item that would cause
> spellchecker to always review the entire document, instead of from the current
> cursor position to the end of the document?
No. Preferences suck.
> I can
Would it be possible to create a user preference item that would cause
spellchecker to always review the entire document, instead of from the current
cursor position to the end of the document?
I can't remember a single time I've ever wanted to use spellchecker, the way
that it currently works. E
Christian Ridderström wrote:
>
>
> I've sent a patch to lyx-docs (this was a documentation bug), see
>
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=996
>
> I wanted to add tooltips but noticed that they were already there in Qt
> and Xforms, so that's that.
>
> What's the next step to get it out
Just started wondering since there hasn't been anything on this list for a
few days...
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
With graphviz's dot, and the following hack, I'm able to produce the
attached document dependency graphs automatically (please see the attached
out.ps.gz<-Extended.lyx and out2.ps.gz to understand what this is about).
I think that the graphs can be useful for checking the overall structure of
the
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> I just tried building latest xforms and got this error:
>
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../../src/frontends/xforms -I../../../src
> -I../../../../images -I../../../../src -I../../../../src/frontends
> -I../../../../src/frontends/controllers -I../../../../boost
>
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 10:59:10PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=996
>
> What's the next step to get it out of bugzilla?
Wait for somebody (that is, me) to review and apply it
regards
john
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 01:46:52PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> A log time ago. Almost from the start of
> the Qt thing. It's easy to reproduce (I can do so on all three, very
> different machines on which I run LyX). Open up a doc and scroll back and
> fort
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 08:18:53PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > to open a dialog that has the title "Document Layout" in xforms and
> > "Document Settings" in Qt. In this case the specification of how to
>
> In truth, there is no reason why the two frontends have different names for
> the sa
Index entries have this on their buttons. Any reason it doesn't use
English (such as "Index") ?
john
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> could someone give me a few pointers to Qt-dialog documentation? (Assuming
> that I should be fiddling inside this file, instead of using some cute GUI
> for designing dialogs of course)
QT documentation:
http://doc.trolltech.com/
(All should be qt 2.3.2 compatible)
Just a reminder that adding a row to a table crashes 1.4CVS
As reported earlier, CPU usage goes toward 100% then crash.
Breakeage happened sometime after June 30.
xforms-1.0.2
Garst
Just to show the difference between compiler versions and to show that
gcc is moving in the right direction.
version sizels -l compile time
gcc 3.2.2 3150291 7937950817m6.396s
gcc 3.3.1 3480221 7969874818m20.070s
gcc 3.4
Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I've sent a patch to lyx-docs (this was a documentation bug), see
|
| http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=996
|
| I wanted to add tooltips but noticed that they were already there in Qt
| and Xforms, so that's that.
|
| What's the n
Just to show the difference between compiler versions and to show that
gcc is moving in the right direction.
version sizels -l compile time
gcc 3.2.2 3150291 7937950817m6.396s
gcc 3.3.1 3480221 7969874818m20.070s
gcc 3.4
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| version sizels -l compile time
| gcc 3.2.2 3150291 7937950817m6.396s
| Note that they are not really equal... 3.3.1 and 3.4 is current CVS
| (half a day ago), but 3.2.2 is current CVS + my shared
I'm a bit confused why we seem to have our own (incomplete) support for
bidi stuff. Is there a good reason we're not using fribidi or equivalent ?
In particular we seem to have fairly hackish support via things like
auto_number instead of properly implementing the unicode bidi algorithm
and suppo
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 11:37:57AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> - allow multiple selections in the add browser
> - prohibit duplicate insertions
OK to apply. Sorry for the delay.
> I'd like to add this functionality also to the bibtex dialog.
> OK to apply (also, if identical, for qbibte
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 08:32:42PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
> The UserGuide uses e.g.
>
> Layout->Document
No it doesn't (where ?). Are you sure you haven't got the 1.3 docs
checked out instead of 1.4cvs docs ?
> to open a dialog that has the title "Document Layout" in xforms a
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 03:45:13PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
> I just tried DefSkip with Layout->Document->Separation=Indent and to my
> surprise the exported Latex still had the default separation value, but
> you can't change the value of that any more in the dialog since 'Indent'
>
42 matches
Mail list logo
