Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> 1. namespace.diff: please apply, it fixes building with aspell.
I'm applying this now (already reviewed).
Alfredo
I have still those two patches in my tree:
1. namespace.diff: please apply, it fixes building with aspell.
2. 1226.diff: fixes bug 1226 and various subbugs (delete selection)
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1226
I have rediffed both just now.
Thanks,
Juergen
Index: src/ChangeLog
Huang Ying wrote:
>>Any special reason why you put the files in gtk instead of gnome?
>
> I use the gtkmm and libglademm to implement the frontend, but not
> anything about gnome. Because the gnome develop platform is so big
> and not as portable as gtk, So I base my work on gtk not gnome.
Th
> | This is a minor issue, but I think the *.glade files should go rather to
> | frontends/gtk/dialogs than to lib/glade (all frontend specific stuff should
> | be in /frontends AFAIK).
>
> Depends a bit... are these glade files precompiled into C++/C code or
> are the glade files used as is and
> o 2 blank lines between functions in .C files please (I guess you can
> script this change)
ok, I will do it.
> o you have too many inline functions. Please make them out of line
ok, I will check all the inline functions. Make ones not necessary
out of line.
> o a couple of points had functions b
> Any special reason why you put the files in gtk instead of gnome?
I use the gtkmm and libglademm to implement the frontend, but not
anything about gnome. Because the gnome develop platform is so big
and not as portable as gtk, So I base my work on gtk not gnome.
And I write the gtk frontend
Hi all,
configure (for the xforms version, not tried the qt version yet)
completes, but then...not much happens when I go make (see below). It is a
cvs update from a few hours ago, the developement branch of course.
Other info
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/cvs/lyx-devel$ automake --version
automake (G
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 02:53:55AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> If it canot be said out in the open... is it then worth saying?
> (as long as it concerns lyx?)
Certainly, the LyX community should strive for an open atmosphere inviting of
comment and feedback, where such an ethos can predo
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 01:15:49AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> Whilst this is true, it would only make real sense to keep with a worse menu
> layout if we expect the total number of current users to forever exceed the
> total number of new users plus the total number of users who switch.
Gadzook
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 01:22:53AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> With templates we can have a .layout keyword. For documents in general,
> either the change tracking, or the standard Undo/Revert stuff will do
> IMO.
Not sure I get your point about .layout.
The problem I'm thinking about is the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| > - what all these NN people sympatize with
|
| It took me a minute to figure out what the blazes you are talking about.
|
| I'm not reposting private emails directed to me. But I found it kind of
| interesting, and worth sharing, that the list is considered by so ma
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:51:52AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> - feature requests
As I said, over a period of weeks and months, if I decide to become more
involved, I'll sift through my old archives and attempt to reintroduce some of
the nifty but long-abandoned historical ideas/ambitions
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| [1] Can I have my yearly "toldyouso" ?
No. This is never helpful and tends to put people in the trenches.
--
Lgb
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:01:03PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > But I don't like the idea of representing it on the UI level for insets
> > in general - what is wrong with using Undo, Revert, etc. if you
> > accidentally delete something important ?
>
> As I mentioned in the quoted text, c
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 04:55:25PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Editing text, if you insert hit a "space" at the end of a word (with other
> words already typed after it), then cntrl-right arrow to jump forward one word,
> then you are left with 2x blank spaces in the text which persist.
>
>
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 01:55:53AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> I just tried it out, and it seems to work fine for me. However I am
> really bad at finding problems with stuff like this.
>
> You really need to get others than me to test this. John is good and
> finding problems...
24 hour
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:51:52AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> I have no problems with the changes John has made, even if I am not
> quite familiar with them yet. (Not having recent documents at end of
> the file menu was a problem...)
I'm still a little split over my change here. On the
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:18:21AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Therefore an alternative proposal: what about introducing an inset --
> we could call it InsetProtected -- that protects everything inside it
> from deletion? A little easier to code on the document level. And the
>From a code poin
I just tried it out, and it seems to work fine for me. However I am
really bad at finding problems with stuff like this.
You really need to get others than me to test this. John is good and
finding problems...
--
Lgb
Editing text, if you insert hit a "space" at the end of a word (with other
words already typed after it), then cntrl-right arrow to jump forward one word,
then you are left with 2x blank spaces in the text which persist.
I imagine this is buggy behavior.
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:45:24AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> And there are two things here:
> - locking the contents of the instet from alteration
> - making the inset be indeletable.
>
> I have sympathy with the first one, I have problems with the second
> one.
>From th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:12:40AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > And _who_ are you to tell people what they should use their spare time
| > on?
| >
| > Put up or shut up, you are really beginning to annoy me now.
|
| Making fundamental UI changes, for fun
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:19:03AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > ERTs that is part of a paragraph _must_ be deleted if the paragraph as
| > a whole is deleted.
| >
| > ERTs that is a paragraph of its own might need to be locked.
|
| Well, I suppose one co
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Attached is the "final" version of my Note/Branch inset work. It
| works, has a decent UI and is I think cleanly coded (in Pascal-style
| C++ :-).
|
| Of course there are always things to improve; opening/closing all
| insets of a given branch is still
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:19:03AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> ERTs that is part of a paragraph _must_ be deleted if the paragraph as
> a whole is deleted.
>
> ERTs that is a paragraph of its own might need to be locked.
Well, I suppose one could disqualify deletion of a block of text
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:12:40AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> And _who_ are you to tell people what they should use their spare time
> on?
>
> Put up or shut up, you are really beginning to annoy me now.
Making fundamental UI changes, for functions that have been around for
what, six
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| But at least it removes the canned text (along with ERT widgets) from view.
It seems to me that a feature like this only have meaning for some
ERTs.
ERTs that is part of a paragraph _must_ be deleted if the paragraph as
a whole is deleted.
ERTs that is a paragraph
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 05:10:54PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
| >
| > Some content from Larry ! :)
|
| Very funny, John.
|
| > Any permutation is a distribution of some kind. This change in
| > particular reflects the general move to an object-verb interface instead
|
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 06:32:54PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > You have so far provided a lot of statements about the development of
| > lyx and the lack of new features, about what has been done to the code
| > and not, and what we have lost because of t
What do you propose be done if someone builds and posts binaries somewhere
else? Which is inevitable.
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 12:23:01PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> > Well, distributing the sources of the native version without the
> > binaries is really hypocritical, I think. If these sou
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 05:10:54PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> Some content from Larry ! :)
Very funny, John.
> Any permutation is a distribution of some kind. This change in
> particular reflects the general move to an object-verb interface instead
> of a verb-object interface. Menus in genera
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 06:32:54PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> You have so far provided a lot of statements about the development of
> lyx and the lack of new features, about what has been done to the code
> and not, and what we have lost because of the drive for GUII.
I've certainly sa
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:18:21AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> Therefore an alternative proposal: what about introducing an inset --
> we could call it InsetProtected -- that protects everything inside it
> from deletion? A little easier to code on the document level. And the
> thing remains
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 09:06:27PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 11:40:45AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > However, for inexperienced users using a template, it may be important that
> > items of LaTeX be "locked", so they may not be casually erased.
>
> But I don't
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 09:06:27PM +0100, John Levon spake thusly:
>
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 11:40:45AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > However, for inexperienced users using a template, it may be important that
> > items of LaTeX be "locked", so they may not be casually erased.
>
> Ha
First bug: nested Note/Branch insets don't work properly, the right
mouse click always goes to the outermost one.
Fix: limit the effect of button 3 to the inset's button area.
Patch replacement file attached.
- Martin
--
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Helsinki University of Technology
Dept
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 11:40:45AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> However, for inexperienced users using a template, it may be important that
> items of LaTeX be "locked", so they may not be casually erased.
Having this as an option in the .layout files sound OK.
But I don't like the idea o
Attached is the "final" version of my Note/Branch inset work. It
works, has a decent UI and is I think cleanly coded (in Pascal-style
C++ :-).
Of course there are always things to improve; opening/closing all
insets of a given branch is still lacking, and the UI for the set of
all branches is a co
ERT can play an important role in creating templates, allowing for insertion of
raw LaTeX at key points throughout a document.
However, for inexperienced users using a template, it may be important that
items of LaTeX be "locked", so they may not be casually erased.
In fact, I would find this v
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 10:15:21AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> pursue their agenda. Maybe, finally, time was ripe to reinvigorate some of the
> ambitions I've encountered around the world for LyX software, documented partly
> in the LyX mailing lists, but perhaps more in some archived priva
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Spitzmueller) writes:
| Huang Ying wrote:
| > The Advice is welcome.
|
| This is a minor issue, but I think the *.glade files should go rather to
| frontends/gtk/dialogs than to lib/glade (all frontend specific stuff should
| be in /frontends AFAIK).
Depends a bit...
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 09:10:54AM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> Do you have any examples? Be as specific as you can.
Kayvan, I returned to evaluate whether to jump back into the LyX effort over a
period of weeks and months (as I said in one of my first postings in 2003).
Those focused on GU
Huang Ying wrote:
> The Advice is welcome.
This is a minor issue, but I think the *.glade files should go rather to
frontends/gtk/dialogs than to lib/glade (all frontend specific stuff should
be in /frontends AFAIK).
Regards,
Juergen.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 05:45:42PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > I think you are now fudding all over the place.
|
| What I find most remarkable about this discussion, Lars, is the emails I've
| received from sympathetic readers who don't want to have to deal w
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 11:58:45PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> The patch contains the the main form, ie the LyXView and Aboutlyx
> dialog. Just a begining with gtk frontend. The render system is based on
> xft including the math things. So making sure that you have configure
> the math xft font pro
Huang Ying <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The patch contains the the main form, ie the LyXView and Aboutlyx
| dialog. Just a begining with gtk frontend. The render system is based on
| xft including the math things. So making sure that you have configure
| the math xft font properly. I think I have
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 09:18:29AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've always wanted the best for LyX. I'm sorry that certain participants
> around here say, basically, that it's not worth their time to respond with any
> substance, then suggest there is no substance to the discussion (LOL) ..
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 05:45:42PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I think you are now fudding all over the place.
What I find most remarkable about this discussion, Lars, is the emails I've
received from sympathetic readers who don't want to have to deal with the
"ramifications" of posting th
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 08:31:28AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 09:15:08AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> > [...] is bad because people might break the rules?
>
> Any situation that predictibly makes violations of the GPL into standard
> practice is, indeed, bad.
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 08:51:56AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I've been using LyX for six years now, and I find
> >
> > - Layout -> Document
> > - Layout -> Paragraph
> > - Layout -> Character
> >
> > very logical now.
>
> Interestingly, over my many years of using LyX, I've wat
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 03:05:42PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Certainly not. But not shouting 'veto' does not mean it is unhearable.
"Your objection has been noted", I said acerbically ;)
> > There are technical reasons for the change. Again, you're too lazy to
> > actually argue the points f
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 05:49:55PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | For example ? When the LyX code has some clients maybe, but until then
> | we have only to deal with the platform's namespace
>
> Note that lyx is also its own client.
This is true. But have we had any real namespace proble
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 01:49:06PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> Fundamental changes sometimes cause problems during periods of
> transition. This does not necessarily imply the change is bad.
Of course not.
But as an infrequent observer over a period of years, it's really striking to
see that
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 08:32:44AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
|
| > | On an ideal world, I don't see the point of the lyx:: namespace.
| >
| > except when used to protect against our own pollution of the global
| > namespace.
|
| For example ? Whe
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I am also a bit wary as I did exactly the same thing about three years
| ago (I could check CVS for specific dates) in my day time job project - and
| undid it shortly afterwards. So this was a complete waste of time.
Let me waste some more time then, a
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:33:10PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> I've been using LyX for six years now, and I find
>
> - Layout -> Document
> - Layout -> Paragraph
> - Layout -> Character
>
> very logical now.
Interestingly, over my many years of using LyX, I've watched other word
proc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I've heard the canard of "feature bloat" from some.
|
| I'd take a few more menu items over boatloads of Evil Red Text any day.
I think you are now fudding all over the place.
--
Lgb
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 10:05:23AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> Because LyX without the 'GUII effort' and further cleanups is in a state
> where adding new features is very difficult. Moreover, even if adding a
> new feature turns out to be possible it most likely adds to the current
> mess and
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| There is consensus amongst everybody except you. That includes Lars and
| JMarc.
If consensus include "I can live with it", then ok.
--
Lgb
--- Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andre> I thought Ruurd offered (d) as a clean way for us but with less
> Andre> hassle for the user than in the other 'clean' solution. I was
> Andre> just trying to say that the hassle for the user is not much
> Andre> less than to let him comp
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 09:37:45AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> So what you are actually proposing is that the current developers or
> whoever distributes LyX (including Kayvan, the Linux distributors etc)
> take some legal risk just for the benefit of a random Windows user that's
> neither abl
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 09:15:08AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> [...] is bad because people might break the rules?
Any situation that predictibly makes violations of the GPL into standard
practice is, indeed, bad. That's an indictment of Troll Tech's practices, not
LyX or QT development by a
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 11:04:14AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> larry> I was rather shrill about the QT effort, in particular. In
> larry> light of Trolltech's dual support for Unix and Windows, the QT
> larry> frontend has always seemed destined to run aground on precisely
> larry> this
So let's hope that there will be qt-3.1.3 soon...
Juergen
-- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --
Subject: Re: [Issue N25747] qt 3.1.2 submenu crash
Date: Montag, 7. Juli 2003 16:53
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Juergen
Now I can reproduce it.
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> I can reproduce the crash with the example on any except the second item of
> the menu. E.g. "Alt+M--Alt+b--Right Arrow" crashes, while
> "Alt+M--Alt+u--Right Arrow" does not.
And the reason is, obviously, the duplicated shortcut of that item (S_u_bmenu2
vs. Submen_u
I am just trying to debug the crash with the qt submenu and keyboards with the
help of Trolltech, who cannot (yet) reproduce the crash, though.
Just to exclude some weirdness on my system, can some of you who also see the
crash try to reproduce it with the attached example app?
You have to compi
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 12:23:01PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 11:53:54AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
...
> > However, if it appears that Ruurd's code can help building a Mingw/X11
> > version of LyX (which would be lighter than a cygwin version and
> > be
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:57:31PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> I thought Ruurd offered (d) as a clean way for us but with less
> Andre> hassle for the user than in the other 'clean' solution. I was
> Andre> just trying to say that the hassle for the user is not much
> Andre> less th
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 01:49:06PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> Entirely wasting my time, but ...
>
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:33:10PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > I guess you'd hear me as soon anybody tries to _release_ 1.4.0 like this.
>
> Are you seriously stating you'll veto this ? A
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:48:02PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: Ok, but if some user want to 'change the library' he'd
Andre> need to re-link LyX, doesn't he? And that would mean at least a
Andre> working linker, which
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc> Yes, I noticed the problem this week end and I know what
Jean-Marc> the problem is. I will try to send you an alternative patch
Jean-Marc> today. Other things that I noticed:
Can you try the following alternative pat
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:48:02PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> Ok, but if some user want to 'change the library' he'd need to
> Andre> re-link LyX, doesn't he? And that would mean at least a working
> Andre> linker, which is less than a full-blown compiler + autotool +
> Andre> ...,
Entirely wasting my time, but ...
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:33:10PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I guess you'd hear me as soon anybody tries to _release_ 1.4.0 like this.
Are you seriously stating you'll veto this ? AFAIK you don't have this
right over the menus.
> > Especially as you are to
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:04:55PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Andre> How do you add some 'win32 window system library' without
Andre> linking LyX? I.e.
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Contrary to the 'mathed font change nightmare', there seem to be users
| (other than myself) complaining about the seemingly randomly shifted menu
| items. If you check you might see a coincidence of most of my whining with
| some user complaining about
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 01:18:31PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:11:01PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > > Your constant (*far* too late) whining about this is starting to annoy
> > > me, I must admit.
> >
> > Good.
>
> OK, then I shall ignore you entirely on this topic
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:11:01PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Your constant (*far* too late) whining about this is starting to annoy
> > me, I must admit.
>
> Good.
OK, then I shall ignore you entirely on this topic. Especially as you
are too lazy to do the groundwork to argue your case.
j
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:04:55PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> How do you add some 'win32 window system library' without
> Andre> linking LyX? I.e. what's the benefit over 'just giving sources
> Andre> and compile instr
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 08:32:44AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | On an ideal world, I don't see the point of the lyx:: namespace.
>
> except when used to protect against our own pollution of the global
> namespace.
For example ? When the LyX code has some clients maybe, but until then
we
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 12:56:42PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 10:05:23AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > That's really bad.
> >
> > No, I think this is just a new superficial mess completely independent of
> > 'real' internal changes. However, as this can be rectified
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> How do you add some 'win32 window system library' without
Andre> linking LyX? I.e. what's the benefit over 'just giving sources
Andre> and compile instructions'? (Legally, it sound ok to me...)
Qt/X11 for win32 is GPL.
JMarc
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:54:31AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | > This patch introduces namespace lyx::insets. both xforms and qt are
> | > handled.
> |
> | Why this sudden fad for making the code harder to read for no apparent
> | purpose ??
>
> *plonk*
??
Maybe you want the question
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 11:40:25AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> No known problems.
>
> [John, that should make you start...]
Can you please wait until at least Wednesday ...
regards
john
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 12:46:22PM +0100, Ruurd Reitsma wrote:
> > I think there are only three clean solutions:
> >
> > (a) Provide detailed instruction how to build LyX/Qt on Windows, but do
> > not distibute prebuild binaries. No need to ask contributors for
> > that.
> >
> > (b) C
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ruurd> Anyway, there's also scenario:
Ruurd> d) Create a Win32 X11 Qt lib from the GPL'ed free edition. Use
Ruurd> that for development & distribution. Let the user add the
Ruurd> 'win32 window system' Qt library.
Ruurd> How does that so
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 10:05:23AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> That's really bad.
>
> No, I think this is just a new superficial mess completely independent of
> 'real' internal changes. However, as this can be rectified by editing
> lib/ui/default.ui with a simple text editor before releasin
Michael Schmitt wrote:
> I am a bit confused. I thought we agreed that each branch/note inset
> should have two properties that correspond to I. and II. above. That
> means, in the document dialog, you can both activate/deactive an inset
> _and_ define its position (or, more general, its appearance
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> - it seems that I cannot get reconfigure to work, but since I cannot
> see the console output, I do not know what is wrong. Do you know how
> it is possible to get this output? Running configure by hand from
> the .lyx directory works, however.
On my OSX, there
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 11:53:54AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> I think we should distribute the source, but not the binaries.
> Andre> ... of the 'native' version I mean.
>
> Well, distributing the sources of the native ve
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think we should distribute the source, but not the binaries.
Andre> ... of the 'native' version I mean.
Well, distributing the sources of the native version without the
binaries is really hypocritical, I think. If these source do not
No known problems.
[John, that should make you start...]
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Index: lyxtext.h
==
Actually, the more I think about it, the more I come to the conclusion that
your approach mixes at least two different concepts which should be
separated:
I. Insets that show/hide parts of the document
-> i.e. Branch, Comment, Note, Greyedout
-> Can contain very large contents up to a complete do
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 11:17:49AM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 11:09:11AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > That is how this discussion started. However, there is little point in
> > hosting Ruurd's source and binaries if we do not want to distribute
> > these binari
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 11:09:11AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> That is how this discussion started. However, there is little point in
> hosting Ruurd's source and binaries if we do not want to distribute
> these binaries. Of course, if the goal changed to having a Qt/X11
> binary for windo
> "Ronald" == Ronald Florence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ronald> On Sunday, July 6, 2003, at 08:18 AM, John Levon wrote:
>>> A user has pointed out that the LyX (Qt/MacOSX) port to the Aqua
>>> interface crashes abruptly if the Navigate menu is clicked while
>>> viewing the Tutoral. I confir
> "Michael" == Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> I would also like to see some native Windows port. With
Michael> xforms and X-Window, we will never penetrate the Window
Michael> world.
Of course it would be nice. But I tend to think (after some
hesitation) that we should j
> "larry" == larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
larry> The problem here is not with the GPL, but with the Trolltech
larry> business model and licensing practices, which puts open source
larry> applications under the GPL in this untenable position if
larry> developers wish to release Windows ve
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 05:37:31PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> But to your preamble problem:
> I still don't understand why you have such problems with simply
> stretching up the preamble dialog in the direction you need
> (longer lines and/or more lines).
I can, but this takes time.
> Why is resi
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 10:37:36AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | lyx::InsetCode would do for me personally.
>
> with lyx::insets::Code you could use just Code in a lot of places.
I know.
But even if I am a big fan of short names in the short range, I find them
confusing on a long distanc
Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I would also like to see some native Windows port. With xforms and
| X-Window, we will never penetrate the Window world.
Has that ever been a goal?
| I would also like to see one site (i.e. www.lyx.org) that provides
| binaries for all platforms (Wi
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
