--- Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andre> I thought Ruurd offered (d) as a clean way for us but with less > Andre> hassle for the user than in the other 'clean' solution. I was > Andre> just trying to say that the hassle for the user is not much > Andre> less than to let him compile and link everything. > > Let's say that a Qt/mingw/x11 solution for win32 would be much better > than xforms/cygwin (Claus H solution), and that as an added bonus > people can also compile that against qt/win and not need X11 (although > this one cannot be distributed). >
I think it would even be possible to just switch .dll's, providing that the 'real' win32 .dll is available from somewhere. No relinking needed. But...let's see if I manage to create a mingw X11 qt lib first and start from there. Ruurd __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com
