On Sunday 02 February 2003 1:41 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | I've reopened the bug and put the patch and test case there but still
> | think that this should be applied to 1.3.
>
> Then test test test... you still have some days before 1.3.0 go out
On Sunday 02 February 2003 1:43 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 06:00:49PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> | > To fix a crash, apply attached. Could all intersted parties (Qt users)
> | > please test this out and report back.
> |
>
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 02:43:49AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | Tested, works fine. Please apply.
>
> Agus test-style? (ok that was low... will not happen again...)
shocking.
Levon-style actually. Which is probably not much better ;)
john
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 02:42:46AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | The Qt TOC dialog was sorting, which it shouldn't do. Lars, OK ?
>
> -1 ?? What are the other options?
>
> No enums? bools? anything?
>
> Just the magical '-1'?
This is Qt we're talking about. Yes, just the magical -1.
In
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 02:38:47AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> I am not happy about it. It requries remerge of po files, one of the
Really ? The only new string is "Apply". Does gettext really behave like
this ?
> What bugs does it fix?
> Regressions?
A regression wrt xforms dialog, but
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Please give this a test. It fixes a critical crash and a serious
| problem.
|
| It seems to work fine for me. Lars, OK ?
|
| Michael K has already given this a run.
Ok.
--
Lgb
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 06:00:49PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
|
| > To fix a crash, apply attached. Could all intersted parties (Qt users)
| > please test this out and report back.
|
| Tested, works fine. Please apply.
Agus test-style? (ok that was low
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The Qt TOC dialog was sorting, which it shouldn't do. Lars, OK ?
-1 ?? What are the other options?
No enums? bools? anything?
Just the magical '-1'?
--
Lgb
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I've reopened the bug and put the patch and test case there but still think
| that this should be applied to 1.3.
Then test test test... you still have some days before 1.3.0 go out
the door.
We should create some testsuite kind of thing for this stuf
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 10:44:22AM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
|
| > the attached fixes it. it's trivial
| >
| > (before or after 1.3 Lars?)
|
| I've tested this (add apply to Qt cross-ref dialog). OK Lars ?
I am not happy about it. It requries remerge o
Please give this a test. It fixes a critical crash and a serious
problem.
It seems to work fine for me. Lars, OK ?
Michael K has already given this a run.
regards
john
Index: QPrefs.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-deve
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 10:44:22AM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> the attached fixes it. it's trivial
>
> (before or after 1.3 Lars?)
I've tested this (add apply to Qt cross-ref dialog). OK Lars ?
john
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 06:00:49PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> To fix a crash, apply attached. Could all intersted parties (Qt users)
> please test this out and report back.
Tested, works fine. Please apply.
regards
john
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 02:30:53PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Therefore, I wrote this little patch (against yesterday's CVS) to add
> support for \eqref. I tested it in the 1.2.2 code, and it works like a
> charm. Please consider adding to to LyX.
please create a bug on bugzilla.lyx.org and
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 03:21:18AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> 1. Tiny / Smallest / Smaller / Small / Normal / Large / Larger ...
> 2. tiny | script | footnote | small | normal | large | Large
> | LARGE | huge | Huge
Does this have an entry on bugzilla ? If not, please make one and atta
The Qt TOC dialog was sorting, which it shouldn't do. Lars, OK ?
regards
john
Index: frontends/qt2/QTocDialog.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/frontends/qt2/QTocDialog.C,v
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.8 Q
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 09:58:33PM +0100, Nabil Hathout wrote:
> Thank you for your help. The problem certainly comes from my Qt
> installation. I did not use Qt before. I have ran qtconfig but it seems
> it is not sufficient to make Qt know the keyboard of my machine.
I wonder if you could tr
John Levon a écrit:
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 01:57:55PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
| This seems to be a local problem on your system.
Font differences?
No. This is before any consideration of fonts. His Qt is claiming
that iso-8869-15 cannot encode oe.
regards
john
Thank yo
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 01:57:55PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | This seems to be a local problem on your system.
>
> Font differences?
No. This is before any consideration of fonts. His Qt is claiming
that iso-8869-15 cannot encode oe.
regards
john
I'm not very good at eating humble pie, but I feel I have to here :-(
Lars, the patch that I submitted to TeX.pm this afternoon broke reLyX when
tested with the other test cases in bugzilla. It didn't include the
trailing whitespace as part of the macro and reLyX therefore generated
tokens such
Hello,
I have added three new bug reports (#857-#859). Could you please confirm
them? (There are 19 unconfirmed bugs in total).
I would also like to draw your attention to bug #576 which turns out as
a serious problem. At the moment, you simply cannot trust the
search&replace function. And onc
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi Lars!
>
> You wrote:
>
>> | Therefore, I wrote this little patch (against yesterday's CVS) to add
>> | support for \eqref. I tested it in the 1.2.2 code, and it works like a
>> | charm. Please consider adding to to LyX.
>>
>> Not for 1.3.0, 1.4.0cvs material.
>
> Wh
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 02:30:53PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
>
> I'm a long time LaTeX user, but a few days ago I decided to try out LyX.
> Quite to my surprise, I find it quite nice to use. LyX gives one a much
> better overview over ones documents, especially when it comes to large
> mathemat
Hi Lars!
You wrote:
> | Therefore, I wrote this little patch (against yesterday's CVS) to add
> | support for \eqref. I tested it in the 1.2.2 code, and it works like a
> | charm. Please consider adding to to LyX.
>
> Not for 1.3.0, 1.4.0cvs material.
Why?
--
Kind regards,
+
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Spitzmueller) writes:
>
> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > | What's to test? The minimal fix works on the test case supplied with
> | > | the bug.
> | >
> | > just get somebody to test it.
> |
> | I can confirm that Angus' minimal fix f
On Saturday 01 February 2003 2:07 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | > | Aren't I clever! Lars, may I apply this fix please?
> | >
> | > Get somebody else to test this and rep
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Spitzmueller) writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | What's to test? The minimal fix works on the test case supplied with the
| > | bug.
| >
| > just get somebody to test it.
|
| I can confirm that Angus' minimal fix fixes the bug in the test case and that
| it doe
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | What's to test? The minimal fix works on the test case supplied with the
> | bug.
>
> just get somebody to test it.
I can confirm that Angus' minimal fix fixes the bug in the test case and that
it does not affect the parsing of real starred commands (\section*)
Is
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | In any re-work, it would be nice to bear in mind content negotiation
| > | for the parser though.
| >
| > ???
|
| Read the link that John supplied. All will become cle
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Therefore, I wrote this little patch (against yesterday's CVS) to add
| support for \eqref. I tested it in the 1.2.2 code, and it works like a
| charm. Please consider adding to to LyX.
Not for 1.3.0, 1.4.0cvs material.
--
Lgb
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | Aren't I clever! Lars, may I apply this fix please?
| >
| > Get somebody else to test this and report back.
|
| What's to test? The minimal fix works on the test ca
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | A. That's because my build dir is not the same as my src dir. That's
| > | my mistake.
| >
| > Yes. When playing with po files you should have srcdir == builddir
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | In any re-work, it would be nice to bear in mind content negotiation
> | for the parser though.
>
> ???
Read the link that John supplied. All will become clear.
--
Angus
[please Cc: me, I'm not subscribed]
Hi guys!
I'm a long time LaTeX user, but a few days ago I decided to try out LyX.
Quite to my surprise, I find it quite nice to use. LyX gives one a much
better overview over ones documents, especially when it comes to large
mathematical formulas.
OTOH, it ta
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Aren't I clever! Lars, may I apply this fix please?
>
> Get somebody else to test this and report back.
What's to test? The minimal fix works on the test case supplied with the
bug.
--
Angus
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | A. That's because my build dir is not the same as my src dir. That's
> | my mistake.
>
> Yes. When playing with po files you should have srcdir == builddir.
> sorry for not communicationg this earlier.
Don't worry
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Aren't I clever! Lars, may I apply this fix please?
Get somebody else to test this and report back.
--
Lgb
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| In any re-work, it would be nice to bear in mind content negotiation
| for the parser though.
???
--
Lgb
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This seems to be a local problem on your system.
Font differences?
--
Lgb
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| A. That's because my build dir is not the same as my src dir. That's my
| mistake.
Yes. When playing with po files you should have srcdir == builddir.
sorry for not communicationg this earlier.
--
Lgb
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> This is perfectly valid LaTeX:
>> \begin{tabular}{|cc|}
>> and I don't think LyX can generate this anymore.
>
> well, it is possible with a bit of a special alignment hassle (see
> attachment), but perhaps this is not what you mean.
>
> J
Running reLyX in debug mode, I notice the following output to console:
Math command | translation
\to \rightarrow
\vert |
\ge \geq
\le \leq
\\,\,
\sb
Angus Leeming wrote:
> This is perfectly valid LaTeX:
> \begin{tabular}{|cc|}
> and I don't think LyX can generate this anymore.
well, it is possible with a bit of a special alignment hassle (see
attachment), but perhaps this is not what you mean.
Jürgen.
#LyX 1.3 created this file. For more
Bug 16 has been classified as a reLyX bug. It's not. I think that
it's partly a lyx2lyx bug and partly a regression in the lyxformat.
I don't provide a fix for lyx2lyx because I have no python yet,
but I hope that the analysis below will make it easy to squash the bug.
At least, squash it as well
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> in which case we need
>> $macro = '(?:\)|([^a-zA-Z)]\*?)|([a-zA-Z]+\*?)\s*)';
>
> In fact, I believe that we can move the two '\*?' bits out of the 'or' to
> give
> $macro = '(?:\)|([^a-zA-Z)])|([a-zA-Z]+)\*?\s*)';
>
> Do you agree?
>
>
45 matches
Mail list logo
