Attached file:
"Document003.pif
Description: Binary data
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 05:10:30AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> now I must make "make rpmdist" work...
ibear in mind http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758 then
regards
john
--
Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person,
the thread is over.
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 04:56:53AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
|
| > Testing until I get "blå i trynet".
|
| -EPARSE there :)
"blue in the face"
| > I think I must have run "make distcheck" a hundred times today...
| > I have it working for xform
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 04:56:53AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Testing until I get "blå i trynet".
-EPARSE there :)
> I think I must have run "make distcheck" a hundred times today...
> I have it working for xforms, now I am making sure it works for qt as
> well.
A worthy goal but as us
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 11:59:20PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
|
| > This patch, together with some renaming of files, cleans some of the
| > qt Makefiles quite a bit IMHO.
|
| Fine by me iff you have tested it
Testing until I get "blå i trynet".
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Is it correct that these two files are unused?
| Should they be removed from the repository?
| Not disted?
They were just placed wrongly in EXTRA_DIST...
--
Lgb
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 04:28:51AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Is it correct that these two files are unused?
> Should they be removed from the repository?
> Not disted?
I assume you mean QPreamble* ?
cvs remove them
john
--
Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same pe
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 11:59:20PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> This patch, together with some renaming of files, cleans some of the
> qt Makefiles quite a bit IMHO.
Fine by me iff you have tested it
regards
john
--
Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person,
the
Is it correct that these two files are unused?
Should they be removed from the repository?
Not disted?
--
Lgb
This patch, together with some renaming of files, cleans some of the
qt Makefiles quite a bit IMHO.
(The full patch with the renaming is a bit to big... and does not give
any more information...)
Objections?
Index: ui/moc/Makefile.am
Attached file:
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there are 15 unconfirmed bugs in bugzilla. I think we should check them
> because unconfirmed bugs are displayed by default by bugzilla.
_not_ displayed, of course
Michael
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 09:19:14PM -0600, Bo Peng wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> To fix bug 686, I
I don't think this is stuiable at this stage (we're in freeze)
please attach your patch to the bug (and add keyword patch if you can)
thanks
john
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 06:45:55PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=824
>
> Even though it is possible to implement browsing for paths in qt only, I have
> decided to do this properly for *both* frontends and I have tested both
> frontends as good as
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 11:04:39AM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> In qt the close/cancel buttons have missing accelerator keys
I was convinced by JMarc they shouldn't really have accelerator keys
(beyond return and escape)
john
--
Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person,
Hi Lars,
here comes the converter patch that is necessary due to Angus's last patch.
Kind regards, Michael
PS: Could you please also check my other patches???
- Trivial mouse wheel patch
- Fix of CTRL-Pos1/End in mathed
- Fix for spacing around previewed formula
Index: ChangeL
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 11:26:46AM -0500, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> edit the replacement line, hit alt-r, and nothing happens
>
> yesterday's cvs.
confirmed. untested patch below. Somebody please apply (I cannot cvs
update)
john
Index: form_spellchecker.fd
=
Hi,
there are 15 unconfirmed bugs in bugzilla. I think we should check them
because unconfirmed bugs are displayed by default by bugzilla.
Michael
Hi,
attached please find a patch for bug #819 (spurious spacing after
previewed formula).
After a long search, it turned out that the width of xforms images is
not computed correctly; actually, a former "fix" makes things go wrong.
I guess the fix was for an old xforms version. But even if the
Angus,
after the recent patch, LyX refuses to display my tgif files anymore on
screen! Console message:
In OpenImage [image.c 224]
/tmp/lyx_tmpdir269918KEo1c/distributed-test-method26991CN5z7t.xpm:
Unknown image format
Do we have to change the converters/converter code? Currently, xpm seems
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Attached is a patch to squash this bug. It's big only because it replaces
| banner.xpm with banner.ppm so that both frontends can still load the splash
| screen natively.
|
| Ok to go in Lars?
Yes.
--
Lgb
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Trivial patch. Ok to go in?
ok
--
Lgb
Attached is a patch to squash this bug. It's big only because it replaces
banner.xpm with banner.ppm so that both frontends can still load the splash
screen natively.
Ok to go in Lars?
--
Angus
xpm.diff.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
Trivial patch. Ok to go in?
--
Angus
Index: src/frontends/xforms/ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/frontends/xforms/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.649
diff -u -p -r1.649 ChangeLog
--- src/frontends/xforms
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 01:23:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Philipp Reichmuth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Hi folks,
> |
> | is there a reason why automake 2.57 is listed as unsupported?
>
> I guess you mean autoconf?
>
> Marked as unsupported since no-one has tested it before.
When doing a make rpmdist on 1.2.3 the build bombs returning the
following error message:
error: Bad owner/group: /tmp/lyx-1.2.3/lyx.xpm
Completely unrelated to this, but is it just me or is ftp.lyx.org having
trouble? It is next to impossible to navigate its directory tree and you
get 'document
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 08:38:35AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> There aren't any threads. Some stuff is handled by background
> processes,
> that's it. Of course one could create the logic with processes as well,
> but exchanging data is a bit more cumbersome then...
Threads, side processes see
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 11:21:11AM -0600, Bo Peng wrote:
> Then will 'load bitmap directly' be quicker? Currently, a new page
> will be re-drawn several times to load the bitmaps.
Lyx's first try to load the picture will start loading it. That is to
say, we can not 'load bitmap directly' without
Philipp Reichmuth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi folks,
|
| is there a reason why automake 2.57 is listed as unsupported?
I guess you mean autoconf?
Marked as unsupported since no-one has tested it before.
Change the approp. line(s) in autogen.sh and report your results here.
If everything w
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 22:02, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> There is a very nasty bug in LyX 1.2.2 configure script: if you
> configure as root and an error occurs during the configure step
> (e.g. xforms not found), the the script will delete the /dev/null
> device. This undoubtly leads to very bad
Hi folks,
is there a reason why automake 2.57 is listed as unsupported?
Cheers -
Philipp Reichmuthmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To have no errors / Would be life without meaning / No struggle, no joy
31 matches
Mail list logo
