On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:33:04PM +, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > > Does this count as comment? ;-)
> >
> > I guess not ;-)
> >
> > At the moment the various bullets are put/defined in static strings
> > within the Bullet class. If you have a look in Bul
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:32:57PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > I will expect you all to be sensible and ocnservative in what you
| > commit to the tree while I am away.
|
| So please clarify what exactly falls under "ocnservative"
| lest we ve
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 05:39:35PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> It's getting a little tedious hitting the "ignore" button every time "rms"
> comes up...
Anyone else see the (unintentional) humour here?
;-P
Jules
On Monday 11 November 2002 5:25 pm, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Didn't there used to be an "ignore always" button on the dialog? It's
> > getting a little tedious hitting the "ignore" button every time "rms"
> > comes up...
> >
> > Angus
>
> I use `Accept word in this session'
On Monday 11 November 2002 4:51 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 04:56:43PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > * Spell check a document to the end.
> > * Reposition the cursor at the start of the document once more.
> > * Hit the "start" button on the spellchecker dialog once again ---
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 04:56:43PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> * Spell check a document to the end.
> * Reposition the cursor at the start of the document once more.
> * Hit the "start" button on the spellchecker dialog once again --- CRASH.
Reported several times. i/aspelll versions please. CV
* Spell check a document to the end.
* Reposition the cursor at the start of the document once more.
* Hit the "start" button on the spellchecker dialog once again --- CRASH.
Angus
Didn't there used to be an "ignore always" button on the dialog? It's getting
a little tedious hitting the "ignore" button every time "rms" comes up...
Angus
> Fix attached.
Thanks!
Applying bullets is still rotten though, so I won't apply for the moment.
Cheers, Ed.
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 04:49:26PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Please have a look, if the changes to lyxlength (the default unit) can
> go in to fix bug 490.
I can't judge the Qt part, but the rest looks sensible. Maybe you could
have a look whether there are other places using strange t
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 04:35:36PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > No comments? No interest?
>
> Pointer to patch? It's not in bugzilla, is it?
No. It was attached to my previous mail in this thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@;lists.lyx.org/msg47939.html
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 04:35:36PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> No comments? No interest?
Pointer to patch? It's not in bugzilla, is it?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Attached is a patch which fixes bug 490 this way.
No comments? No interest?
Jürgen.
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> For some reason QBrowseBox doesn't get mouse focus.
Fix attached.
(Have a look at
http://doc.trolltech.com/3.0/qscrollview.html#details
for details)
Regards,
Jürgen.
Index: src/frontends/qt2/QBrowseBox.C
===
RC
> Your bulletstring.[hC] approach looks ok to me.
I'll commit then.
Thanks, Ed.
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:51:43PM +, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > You need the strings?
>
> yep
Your bulletstring.[hC] approach looks ok to me.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 03:51:03PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log message:
Backed out a change of my last patch which I now see is not correct. This
should fix the undo bugs we see.
This should also be done for 1.2.2.
Is it OK to apply this patch ?
Yes please do so
> I wonder why such a bullet can't be a thin wrapper around a std::string
> like "\ding{49}"? Is this just a performance enhancement?
don't ask me
> You need the strings?
yep
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:33:04PM +, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > Does this count as comment? ;-)
>
> I guess not ;-)
>
> At the moment the various bullets are put/defined in static strings
> within the Bullet class. If you have a look in Bullet.C you will see this
> in bulletEntry(int,int).
I
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:32:57PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I will expect you all to be sensible and ocnservative in what you
> commit to the tree while I am away.
So please clarify what exactly falls under "ocnservative"
lest we venture to forbidded places ;-)
And _much_ more importan
I'll be gone for a week. I had some vacation left...
I will expect you all to be sensible and ocnservative in what you
commit to the tree while I am away.
I might check in from time to time...
--
Lgb
> Does this count as comment? ;-)
I guess not ;-)
At the moment the various bullets are put/defined in static strings within the
Bullet class. If you have a look in Bullet.C you will see this in
bulletEntry(int,int).
Thing is that I need them so that users can set custom bullets using the UI.
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:05:00PM +, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > 2. the bullets
> >
> > I need to set the bullet codes. for now I have put them in the new files
> > bulletstrings.[Ch]. I don't know what is best. move them out of bullet.[Ch]
> > to tex-strings[Ch]?
>
> could someone comment on thi
> 2. the bullets
>
> I need to set the bullet codes. for now I have put them in the new files
> bulletstrings.[Ch]. I don't know what is best. move them out of bullet.[Ch]
> to tex-strings[Ch]?
could someone comment on this before I commit (it's not qt related)
Thanks, Ed.
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 11:37:15AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I understand and agree with you here. However, given that we generate /some/
> preview, we should be able to display it multiple times by
> copying-and-pasting. The bug lies in our implementation, not in the concept.
> Morever, sin
On Monday 11 November 2002 10:34 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 10:30:10AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > Well, I still consider the preview stuff as "highly experimental", so
> > > unless there are hard crashs I'd better leave it as it is...
> >
> > Ummm. Highly experimental
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 10:30:10AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Well, I still consider the preview stuff as "highly experimental", so
> > unless there are hard crashs I'd better leave it as it is...
>
> Ummm. Highly experimental usually means "has been hacked together so it
> works, sort of, bu
On Monday 11 November 2002 10:11 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 10:09:38AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > * Turn math previews on
> > * Write a formula and move the cursor out of the math-inset, so that the
> > math-preview is generated.
> > * Copy the inset and paste it elsewh
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 10:09:38AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> * Turn math previews on
> * Write a formula and move the cursor out of the math-inset, so that the
> math-preview is generated.
> * Copy the inset and paste it elsewhere --- the formula is displayed, but not
> in its previewed stat
* Turn math previews on
* Write a formula and move the cursor out of the math-inset, so that the
math-preview is generated.
* Copy the inset and paste it elsewhere --- the formula is displayed, but not
in its previewed state.
* Move the cursor through the inset. On exit, the inset is displayed a
30 matches
Mail list logo
