On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 10:30:10AM +0000, Angus Leeming wrote: > > Well, I still consider the preview stuff as "highly experimental", so > > unless there are hard crashs I'd better leave it as it is... > > Ummm. Highly experimental usually means "has been hacked together so it > works, sort of, but is really unmaintainable".
No, I mean "does not work out-of-the-box and does not work properly if tweaked". The first is a matter of fact, and the second is a conceptal problem... [I recently came to the conclusion that the only way to get correct previews is to process the full file as there is no way to properly handle included .tex or ERT in general. So what we could do is to run latex every few seconds in the background and update previews afterwards. This would, of course eat much more CPU time and produces a noticeale delay between leaving a formula and update of the preview. But I really see no other robust solution.] > Is that what you feel about my coding? Too early in the week to say ;-) Seriously, it's not the codeing, it's the concept. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
