On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 01:04:32AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 09:23:56PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
>
> > - bugzilla required a new login on almost every page
>
> Bugzilla requires cookies. Well documented (and your paranoia is
> unwarranted)
Why? Session management is doa
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 11:44:17PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 02:10:12PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> ...
> > But at some point of time we have to fix meanings.
> >
> > Does LFUN_BOLD
> >
> >(a) "make it somehow thicker"
> >(b) use \textbf
> (c) make
Hi,
There are still problems with the layout files and templates.
The layout files need to be fixed with respect to the new .inc files.
I myself am using revtex4.layout, and LyX gets completely muddled up
without the appropriate .inc inclusions in the layout.
I'm afraid (but I'm not sure) that
Hi,
I believe we can address the polling and cursor problems in LyX
under DRT by identifying a user action as follows:
* an X input determines the start of an action (e.g., key press)
* a burst of X outputs (e.g., screen draw requests) determine the end of the
action (e.g., show the correspond
John Levon wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 12:20:06PM +0200, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
>> >> I think this is a bad attitude towards bugs. Why not stop all
>> >> development in lyx? You can fix all bugs in latex code(easily) ;-)
> Your comment "Why not stop all development in lyx" made it
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 11:31:02PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Maybe a typo? Changing to "Key_unknown" made it compile and bind.
> (Following the definition of class QT in
>"/usr/lib/qt3.0.3/include/qnamespace.h")
I already committed the fix to the typo ...
regards
john
--
"Say what y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Compiling lyx1.3 --with-frontend=qt yields to
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../src -I../../../src/ -I../../../src/fronte
nds/ -I../../../images -I./qt2 -I/usr/lib/qt3/include -I../../../boost -I../../.
./src/frontends/controllers -isystem /usr/X11R6/incl
Thanks Dekel.. that did it...
>
> Copy (or link) the directory LYXSRCDIR/lib/lyx2lyx to LYXDIR/lyx2lyx.
>
Well, I was hoping to do both.. as in, use and test..
nirmal
> if you are trying to use lyx in general as opposed to helping test it
> or develop it, it's a very bad idea to use the development version, at
> least until such a time that the first pre-release is made available.
>
> regards
> jo
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 11:48:11AM -0400, Nirmal Govind wrote:
> My earlier problem still exists.. can't open any of my earlier files, I
> get the error: ERROR: Can't find conversion script.. please help!! (I
> really don't want to revert back to the stable version given that it
> took me hours t
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 12:46:28AM -0400, Nirmal Govind wrote:
> Secondly, I'm unable to open any lyx 1.2 files.. it says ERROR: Can't
> find conversion script .. Dekel's reply to this on the mailing list was
> that lyx2lyx wasn't installed in the proper directory.. so I made a
> softlink to lyx2l
Thanks John..
> No workaround, but you should be able to ignore it. It's an xforms
> bug.
Ok...
> This preference has been removed entirely. Please see the archives for
> how to re-introduce this functionality if you want it.
Will do..
My earlier problem still exists.. can't open any of my e
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 12:20:06PM +0200, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> >> Reasons given:
> >> 1) It is hard to fix.
> >> 2) It is easy to remove the pipes manually.
>
> >> I think this is a bad attitude towards bugs. Why not stop all development
> >> in lyx? You can fix all bugs in latex co
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 12:46:28AM -0400, Nirmal Govind wrote:
> Hi.. I just got the 1.3.0CVS version of lyx.. a few problems.. when I
> start lyx from the command prompt, I get an unhandled exception error:
>
> Received unhandled X11 event
> Type: 0xd Target: 0x39c
>
> I checked the mailin
John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 03:35:09PM +0200, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
>> Reasons given:
>> 1) It is hard to fix.
>> 2) It is easy to remove the pipes manually.
>> I think this is a bad attitude towards bugs. Why not stop all development
>> in lyx? You can fix all bugs in
Rob Lahaye wrote:
> So at present, PAPER_DEFAULT is redundant and even worse: it suggests
> things that it does not! I think, either we get rid of it altogether, or do
> a major code-change so that indeed the class default is used.
Agreed.
> I decided for the removal.
That's fine with me.
Jürg
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> R. Lahaye wrote:
>
>>In the preferences dialog, Outputs->Misc->Papersize has a choice "default",
>>which I only can see as a nonsense option.
>
>
> It /should/ use the default paper option of the class, which is e.g. A4 for
> scrbook and some us value for the stan
R. Lahaye wrote:
> In the preferences dialog, Outputs->Misc->Papersize has a choice "default",
> which I only can see as a nonsense option.
It /should/ use the default paper option of the class, which is e.g. A4 for
scrbook and some us value for the standard classes.
But you're right, it always
18 matches
Mail list logo
