On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 09:05:29PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> Proof of concept see attached gif.
>
> It is actually not as slow as I expected. In its current (really stupid)
> implementation its less than a second for the preview to come up (on my
> admittedly fairly recent machine_.
>
> B
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 09:05:29PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> Proof of concept see attached gif.
>
> It is actually not as slow as I expected. In its current (really stupid)
> implementation its less than a second for the preview to come up (on my
> admittedly fairly recent machine_.
I'm s
Proof of concept see attached gif.
It is actually not as slow as I expected. In its current (really stupid)
implementation its less than a second for the preview to come up (on my
admittedly fairly recent machine_.
But it eats quite a bit of memory currently and does not clean up properly.
A bi
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 08:21:17PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> first shot at preview. It crashes. Don't know why. To see it work a
> bit, change formula.C:191, to see it crash remove the comment further
> down.
Actually I still don't really understand the way the graphics/
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 07:51:53PM +0200, Jan Sykora wrote:
> Lyx 1.2.0 strips double {{ }} into a single {} in math mode. This is
> necessary to be used with IEEEtran class and constructions like
> \bm{{\hat{\xi}}}.
>
> If I insert double {{ }} and proceed with view->dvi everything is OK.
> H
Jan Sykora wrote:
> Lyx 1.2.0 strips double {{ }} into a single {} in math mode. This is
> necessary to be used with IEEEtran class and constructions like
> \bm{{\hat{\xi}}}.
I can not see any difference between
\bm{{\hat{\xi}}} and \bm{\hat{\xi}}
in IEEEtran.cls, too.
Herbert
--
http:
Lyx 1.2.0 strips double {{ }} into a single {} in math mode. This is
necessary to be used with IEEEtran class and constructions like
\bm{{\hat{\xi}}}.
If I insert double {{ }} and proceed with view->dvi everything is OK.
However when I save that document, quit the lyx and later reopen the
doc
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 5:40 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 05:06:39PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > When you do, I wonder if you can think of a way of doing things a little
> > better ;-)
>
> I think parts of the code for the spalsh screen could be factored out into
> a re-u
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 05:14:11PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> There appears to be some prelimiary code in mathed/preview.[Ch] that might
> interest you.
Not yet. As I said, wait a bit.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deser
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 05:06:39PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> When you do, I wonder if you can think of a way of doing things a little
> better ;-)
I think parts of the code for the spalsh screen could be factored out into
a re-useable class. Constructor would take the file name and a call ba
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 06:15:57PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Considering the title of this thread and my complete lack of knowledge
> what this might be about, do you consider it likely that the screen
> shots for my WYSIWYG talk to be delivered at TUG2002 could need
> brushing up for the fina
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 5:15 pm, David Kastrup wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 04:53:30PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > Ok, André, I've done as you desired and stripped out all the
> > > InsetGraphics nonsense from the graphics cache. InsetGraphic
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 5:11 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 04:53:30PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Ok, André, I've done as you desired and stripped out all the
> > InsetGraphics nonsense from the graphics cache. InsetGraphics now has
> > code to generate the pixmap once the
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 04:53:30PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Ok, André, I've done as you desired and stripped out all the
> > InsetGraphics nonsense from the graphics cache. InsetGraphics now
> > has code to generate the pixmap once the file is lo
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 04:53:30PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Ok, André, I've done as you desired and stripped out all the InsetGraphics
> nonsense from the graphics cache. InsetGraphics now has code to generate the
> pixmap once the file is loaded.
Thank you.
I'll have a look.
Andre'
--
Ok, André, I've done as you desired and stripped out all the InsetGraphics
nonsense from the graphics cache. InsetGraphics now has code to generate the
pixmap once the file is loaded.
LyXScreen (frontends/screen.C) has some equivalent code so that we can show
the splash screen once again.
So,
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 04:24:05PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> The fine points can't be expressed in such small space, anyway.
That's why I did not ask you to change anything...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, eithe
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 03:42:51PM +0200, geof wrote:
> Hi, I've just finished to compile lyx-devel.
> But when I start lyx, I get the following error !
> What can be the problem ?
The binary might contain an illegal op-code and the processor complains?
I don't really know.
Andre'
--
Those who
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 03:44:45PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> > Did that. Considering the brevity of this overview, I troed squeezing
> > this into one sentence. I also don't know whether this special
> > mention is biased against TeXmacs, since I
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 03:44:45PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Did that. Considering the brevity of this overview, I troed squeezing
> this into one sentence. I also don't know whether this special
> mention is biased against TeXmacs, since I don't have any knowledge
> about the relative quali
Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 12:39:41PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> >
> > On http://preview-latex.sourceforge.net/others.html> I outline
> > several WYSIWYG-related software pieces in connection with LaTeX.
> > Among others, I mention LyX.
> >
> > Would you
Hi, I've just finished to compile lyx-devel.
But when I start lyx, I get the following error !
What can be the problem ?
geof
15:37:49> lyx-CVS &
[1] 7541
15:37:54> LyX: Creating directory /home/piroux/.lyx-CVS/ and running
configure...
checking for a LaTeX2e program... (latex
Attached the patch representing my work on the counters.[hC] classes,
with a view to using them in short title insets.
Currently these classes don't actually do anything yet; next (inbetween
holidays) I will have to look at actually creating these insets for
sectioning headers (cf. my earlier in
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 01:44:16PM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
>
> Aehm... could it be that these are other dependency for other files?
>
> Not that it would make much sense to include such a lot of empty
> dependencies, but it should be legal.
... and they are produced by the tr/sed combo in
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:20:41AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > You mean the lines ending in a colon?
> >
> > I've got them, too. But I don't even know how lyx produces its
> > dependencies...
>
> Me neither, although I believe that it makes use of "${CXX} -E".
> Anyway, at lesst this means th
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 12:39:41PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Would you say that I have missed out features that would warrant
> mentioning in this context, or that I have written anything that
> could be considered misleading?
I think it reflects the current state-of-the-art rather well.
An
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 12:39:41PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> On http://preview-latex.sourceforge.net/others.html> I outline
> several WYSIWYG-related software pieces in connection with LaTeX.
> Among others, I mention LyX.
>
> Would you say that I have missed out features that would warran
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:46:19PM +0200, bernhard wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm a fan of Lyx, usually running on Linux. But now Ihave OSX and miss
> Lyx so much. I know there is a version on X on X, but will there be a
> port to native OSX? I think this will be a nice thing for Tex users on
> OSX, and
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:20:41AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Me neither, although I believe that it makes use of "${CXX} -E".
That's just preprocessing... I usually use -MM but that's a GNUism ...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor d
On http://preview-latex.sourceforge.net/others.html> I outline
several WYSIWYG-related software pieces in connection with LaTeX.
Among others, I mention LyX.
Would you say that I have missed out features that would warrant
mentioning in this context, or that I have written anything that
could be
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:32:25PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
...
> | For me again, the distinction between "Table" and "Tabular" is a bit too
> | ambiguous. Adding "Float" to the menu name whenever a float is what we
> | have, is both simple and semantically correct.
>
> And you won't h
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 11:01 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 10:18:01AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > My dependencies seem to have gone mad! Why are all these controllers
> > ControlBibitem.lo: ../../../../devel/src/insets/insetbutton.h
> > ../../../../devel/src/insets/insetf
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 10:18:01AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> My dependencies seem to have gone mad! Why are all these controllers
> ControlBibitem.lo: ../../../../devel/src/insets/insetbutton.h
> ../../../../devel/src/insets/insetfloat.h:
You mean the lines ending in a colon?
I've got them,
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:28:42AM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> >No. 2.95.4 was the last official release before 3.0 IIRC.
>
> At least http://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html doesn't reflect this
> and ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/gcc/ doesn't offer it.
So I stand corrected.
Andre'
--
Those who desir
My dependencies seem to have gone mad! Why are all these controllers
dependent on insetgraphics?
André, since I've now got a nice clean GraphicsCache for you could you have a
look at your dependencies (controllers/.deps) and see if you have a similar
nonsense?
Ok, so that was cheeky ;-)
Ang
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:05:16AM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
>>
>>Not that general. gcc uses native ld by default and at least
>>for Solaris this works fine. For HP-UX, as Angus said, a later
>>gcc might help. But gcc 2.95.4 is fiction, Angus, isn't it?
>
> No. 2.95.4 wa
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:05:16AM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Not that general. gcc uses native ld by default and at least
> for Solaris this works fine. For HP-UX, as Angus said, a later
> gcc might help. But gcc 2.95.4 is fiction, Angus, isn't it?
No. 2.95.4 was the last official release bef
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 09:51:31AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> It stems from some changes that John checked in on Friday. He mentioned
> something about not being around for a week or so...
Nice move...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have,
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 10:05 am, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > The usual answer is "Don't mix gcc with 'native' binutils".
>
> Not that general. gcc uses native ld by default and at least
> for Solaris this works fine. For HP-UX, as Angus said, a later
> gcc might help. But gcc
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> The usual answer is "Don't mix gcc with 'native' binutils".
Not that general. gcc uses native ld by default and at least
for Solaris this works fine. For HP-UX, as Angus said, a later
gcc might help. But gcc 2.95.4 is fiction, Angus, isn't it?
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders <
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 9:52 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I still have this _very_ nasty general redraw problem for the main lyx
> text.
It stems from some changes that John checked in on Friday. He mentioned
something about not being around for a week or so...
A
I still have this _very_ nasty general redraw problem for the main lyx
text.
Here is a result of lyx -dbg gui,workarea newfile1.lyx (with newfile1.lyx
containing an empty math inset):
Setting debug level to gui,workarea
Debugging `gui' (GUI handling)
Debugging `workarea' (Workarea events)
LyX
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 9:45 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 10:25:24AM +0200, Jost Martin wrote:
> > This all didn't change anything. So now I'm at the end of my wits...
>
> The usual answer is "Don't mix gcc with 'native' binutils".
>
> Can't you just use the native compiler i
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 10:25:24AM +0200, Jost Martin wrote:
> This all didn't change anything. So now I'm at the end of my wits...
The usual answer is "Don't mix gcc with 'native' binutils".
Can't you just use the native compiler if you insist on the native linker?
Andre'
--
Those who desire
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 03:36:50PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> > What compiler, what machine was that?
>
> FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE i386 / GNU project C and C++ Compiler (gcc-2.95.3)
I have the same compiler, Linux though, but that should really make no
difference.
> On another Linux (Mandrake 8.0) PC
Hello,
Olli Grewe reported on 13.6.2002 (on the lyx-users-list) about problems compiling lyx
1.2.0.
I've got the same problem on HPUX 10.20 using gcc 2.95.2.
I checked Bugzilla but found nothing.
Compilation went smoothly, but the link-step failed with the same bunch of missing
symbols. (But t
On Monday 24 June 2002 14:13, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 03:05:59PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > can't you do it in external scripts, like the first implementation ?
>
> The external scripts would have to re-create the structure used within
> mathed (more or less). I just got
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 08:12:30AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | lyxfunc.o: In function `LyXFunc::verboseDispatch(kb_action,
> | basic_string,
> | __default_alloc_template > const &, bool)':
>
> And you did do a autogen of course? And a reconfigure?
It works after autogen. Sorry.
Andre'
48 matches
Mail list logo
