Ok, These patches are now under bugzilla.
--
***
*Alain Castera*
* IPNL - UCB Lyon 1 | e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Bat. Paul Dirac | or
This is pre-alpha, and relies on some stuff lyx can't yet do.
o dunno where to put preferences. Tools is a possibility, but that sucks
o insert is still far too clumsy
Note some of the stuff won't show properly, but I'd appreciate comments
anyway
just stick the attached as default.ui to see so
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 03:25:22PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > Anybody use this one ?
>
> Oh no, not him again.
Afraid so.
> Yes, I do.
OK, can you explain to me in a bit more detail how you navigate your
document ? What do you do if you need to go back and check something ?
Do you use bookma
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, John Levon wrote:
> Anybody use this one ?
Oh no, not him again.
Yes, I do.
Will you please just make a single email with a list all the stuff you
really really hate.
Allan. (ARRae) I'm leaving now.
This is another one ... what's the rationale behind it ?
regards
john
--
"If a thing is not diminished by being shared, it is not rightly owned if
it is only owned & not shared."
- St. Augustine
Anybody use this one ?
regards
john
--
"If a thing is not diminished by being shared, it is not rightly owned if
it is only owned & not shared."
- St. Augustine
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 02:52:17PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> FYI, you have eyes and a brain that is capable of pattern recognition.
> We gave you a cursor (even one you can control with a mouse) you can
> do the search and replace by hand. Like we did in the good old days
> when I were a lad. Oh
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, John Levon wrote:
> Until Angus changed it to be part of the workarea, the reason for this
> pref was a useful workaround for some very annoying lyx behaviour. Do
> we really still need it ?
No. Now that we [will soon] have the splash in the workarea whenever
we have no buf
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, John Levon wrote:
[...]
> More hyperbole.
It's seems I'm wasting my time at the moment if all I can write is
hyperbole. There I was trying to make a point with sarcasm but it
seems to be wasted on you on a Friday.
FYI, you have eyes and a brain that is capable of pattern r
Can anybody remember/know why we don't use xform's double buffer for the
work area (->flpixmap, fl_set_dblbuffer) ?
Argh, actually, it looks like xforms is internally as stupid as the
FL_DRAW outside ... but I think if you're going to patch xforms angus,
this might be better ?
john
--
"If a t
Until Angus changed it to be part of the workarea, the reason for this
pref was a useful workaround for some very annoying lyx behaviour. Do
we really still need it ?
I'm about to commit a patch which breaks the banner, btw, until the
graphics stuff is properly reworked
regards
john
--
"If a
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 01:34:43PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> People everywhere are apathetic. They realise that the world changes
> from one bad day to the next and there's bugger all they can do about
> it and noone listens when they complain anyway. So why bother?
I think you don't have enou
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 12:36:17PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > > Those of you who wish this option to remain, speak now or forever hold
> > > your peace. With justifications, please !
> >
> > The findings of such a survey would be more valid IMO if it we
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 12:36:17PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > Those of you who wish this option to remain, speak now or forever hold
> > your peace. With justifications, please !
>
> The findings of such a survey would be more valid IMO if it were asked
> on the users list also (as you haven't
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, John Levon wrote:
> Those of you who wish this option to remain, speak now or forever hold
> your peace. With justifications, please !
The findings of such a survey would be more valid IMO if it were asked
on the users list also (as you haven't cc'd that list and I'm no
long
Hi,
Andre', is this bug related to your mathed-stuff?
The bug, as mentioned before in
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg39632.html
was there also some time ago; see, for example:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg39127.html
Andre', you fixed it t
Those of you who wish this option to remain, speak now or forever hold
your peace. With justifications, please !
We should kill the pref and just not ask.
regards
john
--
"If a thing is not diminished by being shared, it is not rightly owned if
it is only owned & not shared."
- St. A
> don't you still need cygwin for xforms / X11 ?
It's possible to build a native win32 xforms lib.
>
> Where has this code come from ? Some of it lacks license information. If
> we do this, and this code has come from some library, I'd rather depend
> on that library rather than introduce this c
Should I kill screen-recenter to allow M-x for accessing the minibuffer
?
john
--
"If a thing is not diminished by being shared, it is not rightly owned if
it is only owned & not shared."
- St. Augustine
Just to make sure this won't get lost. Today's work of people kidnapped by
Jose' including a shot at \fbox support and support for InsetCommand
within mathed.
Again this is purely informational, I'll apply it as soon as Jose'
releases me and Air France is in the mood of flying.
Andre'
--
And
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 02:51:58PM +0200, Ruurd Reitsma wrote:
> in order to satisfy my perverse desire to run lyx on M$ Windows, I've put
> together a couple of wrappers for the POSIX calls in lyx, which are missing
> in the win32 api. This enables lyx to be compiled using the mingw
> (http://ww
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 06:20:09PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Well I've only browsed your xforms email, but we need a sub-region not
> > the entire workarea object, unless you fancy copying a massive pixmap on
> > every cursor blink (didn't think so).
>
> That's what we do now. See the cod
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Are you able to create a _small_ test program that shows this error?
I'm afraid no :-(
But a fresh checkout cured it, so I suppose there was something rotten on my
side.
Thanks,
Juergen
On Thursday 20 June 2002 6:13 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 05:51:56PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > because of the loop in objects.c's mark_for_redraw / fl_redraw_form:
> > for (ob = form->first; ob; ob = ob->next)
> > ob->redraw = 1;
> > that is called by fl_h
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 05:51:56PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> because of the loop in objects.c's mark_for_redraw / fl_redraw_form:
> for (ob = form->first; ob; ob = ob->next)
> ob->redraw = 1;
> that is called by fl_handle_forms and flags all objects on the form for
> redr
On Thursday 20 June 2002 5:49 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 05:26:16PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > So that means that the code in XScreen that calls
> > XCopyArea (display, cursor_pixmap, owner_.getWin(), ...
> > direct is incorrect (which is your comment about the cursor
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 05:26:16PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> So that means that the code in XScreen that calls
> XCopyArea (display, cursor_pixmap, owner_.getWin(), ...
> direct is incorrect (which is your comment about the cursor being broken)?
>
> Instead it should call
> XCo
On Thursday 20 June 2002 4:36 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 11:33:29AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > BufferView and lyxfunc no longer resize() themselves. Presumably because
> > the resize event is coming from behind the frontends firewall and they
> > should be told about it,
"R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>
>> > "R" == R Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> R> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> >> > "R" == R Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >>
>> >> >> How relevant is it to know your exact version of freebsd?
>>
29 matches
Mail list logo
