I think ascii text is incorrect term in LyX.
ASCII is 7bit text like Latin1, but we use it word for
unstructured plain text.
I suggest plain text is more correctly.
--
Lav
Vitaly Lipatov
GNU! Linux! LaTeX! LyX!
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 11:07:11AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > Because LyX has reached puberty and now has acne.
>
> bah, a joke isn't funny when you make it twice.
>
> Oh, it's friday
Damn, that's right! I was not only agreeing with you but saying
ther
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Thursday 07 March 2002 4:02 pm, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > I had a look > and the only thing I don't like is the Help
> button. We don't have that > button on any other dialog so why
> should we have it here?
>
> I think Lars' greets comments like that
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 05:45:03PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Do we need this file in cvs? I seem to regenerate it on a regular basis (and
> > then have to through it away and cvs update it because the order here is so
> > very different from the one
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 11:07:11AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> Because LyX has reached puberty and now has acne.
bah, a joke isn't funny when you make it twice.
Oh, it's friday
john
--
I am a complete moron for forgetting about endianness. May I be
forever marked as such.
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, John Levon wrote:
> Why do we have a pimpl for BufferView ?
Because LyX has reached puberty and now has acne.
Allan. (ARRae)
Why do we have a pimpl for BufferView ?
john
--
I am a complete moron for forgetting about endianness. May I be
forever marked as such.
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 08:31:07PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | sure but if we want to read one of your mass cleanup patches ?
>
> This one. I do not understand what you want?
>
> less ??
ah OK. I mean more trivial ones that you just apply straight way.
"Patches" was the wrong word,
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 07:07:43PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Do we want to?
>> There is a selection box at the bottom of the page where you can
>> choose "unified diff".
>
| sure but if we want to read one of your mass cleanup patches ?
This
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 07:57:14PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | yeah, I guess I can do that if it's hard to modify the script...
>
> and I still do not know what you really meant in the prev mail...
what do you mean ? I don't know what you're referring to ...
john
--
I am a complete
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 07:31:40PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> cvs rdiff -D -D
>lyx-devel
>
| yeah, I guess I can do that if it's hard to modify the script...
and I still do not know what you really meant in the prev mail...
--
Lgb
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 10:36:35AM -0800, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> Is there anybody looking at this? Currently, we have lost the ability
> to compile LyX under Win32.
Well I guess we need people like you who can actualy investigate the
problem ...
> I will enter this bug in the bugzilla if no
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 12:04:23PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Lars> "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Any more
> Lars> developments on this?
>
> Lars> As I see it, it is supposed to work.
>
> Lars> And
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 07:31:40PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> cvs rdiff -D -D
>lyx-devel
yeah, I guess I can do that if it's hard to modify the script...
john
--
I am a complete moron for forgetting about endianness. May I be
forever marked as such.
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 07:07:43PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Do we want to?
>> There is a selection box at the bottom of the page where you can
>> choose "unified diff".
>
| sure but if we want to read one of your mass cleanup patches ?
?? re
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 07:07:43PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Do we want to?
> There is a selection box at the bottom of the page where you can
> choose "unified diff".
sure but if we want to read one of your mass cleanup patches ?
john
--
I am a complete moron for forgetting about e
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 07:07:43PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> There is a selection box at the bottom of the page where you can
> choose "unified diff".
I guess I missed that box.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
line 74. Replace:
to.push_back(fo_it);
with
to.push_back(&(*fo_it));
and thank Lars.
Angus
How about using the dropmenu at the bottom of the page? Then you can get
a context diff or a unified diff as in
http://www.lyx.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/lyx-devel/src/mathed/math_parser.C?r1=1.187&r2=1.188&diff_format=u
Otto
On Thu, 2002-03-07 at 18:57, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > Patches:
> >
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Patches:
>> lyx-devel/src/mathed/
>>
>http://www.lyx.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/lyx-devel/src/mathed/math_parser.C?r1=1.187&r2=1.188
>
| I wonder whether we could get an additional link to some version of this
| diff without the fancy table stuff colou
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Incidentally, in FormSendto.C I have:
>
| vector::iterator result = keys.begin();
| vector::const_iterator it = all_formats_.begin();
| vector::const_iterator end = all_formats_.end();
| for (; it != end; ++it, ++result) {
|
> Patches:
> lyx-devel/src/mathed/
>
>http://www.lyx.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/lyx-devel/src/mathed/math_parser.C?r1=1.187&r2=1.188
I wonder whether we could get an additional link to some version of this
diff without the fancy table stuff colouring (to view it in e.g. lynx or to
reverse-apply
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 05:45:03PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Do we need this file in cvs? I seem to regenerate it on a regular basis (and
> then have to through it away and cvs update it because the order here is so
> very different from the one you lot create).
go to the archives and sear
Do we need this file in cvs? I seem to regenerate it on a regular basis (and
then have to through it away and cvs update it because the order here is so
very different from the one you lot create).
Angus
On Thursday 07 March 2002 4:48 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I had to apply this to make it compile:
>
> Index: src/frontends/controllers/ControlSendto.C
> ===
> RCS file:
/usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/frontends/controller
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 07 March 2002 4:38 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Lars, it works pretty well. However, load the User Guide and
>> (using the new custom-export dialog ;-) try ASCII, more $$FName.
>
| Interestingly, these long lines all have a fullstop in them
I had to apply this to make it compile:
Index: src/frontends/controllers/ControlSendto.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/frontends/controllers/ControlSendto.C,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 ControlSend
On Thursday 07 March 2002 4:38 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Lars, it works pretty well. However, load the User Guide and
> (using the new custom-export dialog ;-) try ASCII, more $$FName.
Interestingly, these long lines all have a fullstop in them and the space
after has been swallowed up. Eg:
t
Lars, it works pretty well. However, load the User Guide and
(using the new custom-export dialog ;-) try ASCII, more $$FName.
After all those caption not found messages you'll find in
1.4.1 Basic File Operations
...
The Revert to saved command is useful if more people
work on the same documen
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
"Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
| Lars> | Lars> btw. the label stuff is needed, it ca
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 04:26:04PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Incidentally, a quick grep of the src directory shows that only
> WorkArea.h
> XFormsView.h
> minibuffer.h
> lyx_gui.C
> lyxserver.C
> #include FORMS_H_LOCATION
>
> It looks like we've made real progr
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Lars> | Lars> btw. the label stuff is needed, it cannot just be
Lars> removed.
>>
Lars> | Could you hint at t
On Thursday 07 March 2002 4:02 pm, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 07-Mar-2002 Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > I also think I've forgotten Ascii as paragraphs.
>
> There is no such thing as Ascii as paragraphs for export.
Indeed. The dialog and the menu now have the same entries.
> I had a look
> and th
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> btw. the label stuff is needed, it cannot just be removed.
>
| Could you hint at the reason for that?
it seems that abstract does not have it set. with references it ends
u
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> btw. the label stuff is needed, it cannot just be removed.
Could you hint at the reason for that? Is it related to the strange
code to have either "Abstract" or "Abstract: " depending on some weird
test? What is the rationale
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Juergen> On 07-Mar-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
| Juergen> Does labelString have a po variant? (just a thought)
>>> Not really, but you get the same as what you get on screen
On 07-Mar-2002 Angus Leeming wrote:
> I also think I've forgotten Ascii as paragraphs.
There is no such thing as Ascii as paragraphs for export. I had a look
and the only thing I don't like is the Help button. We don't have that
button on any other dialog so why should we have it here?
On 07-Mar-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| BTW.: I did this for the forms directory (I didn't know it was striktly
>| forbidden) and it seemed to work. What is now wrong with the forms
>| directory?
>
> it is not really deleting the directly it only deletes the files...
Yes and t
On 07-Mar-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Yes, but what is currently in ascii code is not right.
Agreed!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 /
On Thursday 07 March 2002 3:43 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> 1/ when I select File>Export>Custom I get both custom export _and_
>spellchecker dialogs
Then you have a dependencies problem. The showSendto signal in Dialogs.h
occupies the spot in memory that the showSpellchecker signal did.
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 07-Mar-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Juergen> Does labelString have a po variant? (just a thought)
>> Not really, but you get the same as what you get on screen :)
Juergen> Well in part you're right. This should depend
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 07-Mar-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>>| ??? So I'm not allowed to do 'cvs delete support' which deletes all
>>| files in this directory (which should have been rm'ed before)?
>>>
>>| I don't think so.
>>
>> excatly. You are not allowed to do th
On 07-Mar-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Juergen> Does labelString have a po variant? (just a thought)
>
> Not really, but you get the same as what you get on screen :)
Well in part you're right. This should depend on the buffer language
not the GUI language. We really should find some way
On 07-Mar-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| ??? So I'm not allowed to do 'cvs delete support' which deletes all
>| files in this directory (which should have been rm'ed before)?
>>
>| I don't think so.
>
> excatly. You are not allowed to do that.
And why? It's the same operation as doing cvs
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 07-Mar-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | Why not use par->params().labelString() always?
>>
>> You tell me... I didn't write this code. (I hope)
Juergen> Does labelString have a po variant? (just a thought)
Not really
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 07-Mar-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> _NO_!
>>
>> You never ever delete dirs with CVS.
>
| ??? So I'm not allowed to do 'cvs delete support' which deletes all
| files in this directory (which should have been rm'ed before)?
>
| I don't think s
1/ when I select File>Export>Custom I get both custom export _and_
spellchecker dialogs
2/ the list of format should be the same as the list which is in the
File>Export submenu.
JMarc
On 07-Mar-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| Why not use par->params().labelString() always?
>
> You tell me... I didn't write this code. (I hope)
Does labelString have a po variant? (just a thought)
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars> | On Thursday 07 March 2002 3:06 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I have a new patch... This one also cleans up some que
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars> | On Thursday 07 March 2002 3:06 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I have a new patch... This one also cleans up some que
On 07-Mar-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> _NO_!
>
> You never ever delete dirs with CVS.
??? So I'm not allowed to do 'cvs delete support' which deletes all
files in this directory (which should have been rm'ed before)?
I don't think so.
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-.
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> holiday is over... Andre'
Welcome back. There are a few messages and patches waiting for you :)
JMarc
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> | On Thursday 07 March 2002 3:06 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>> I have a new patch... This one also cleans up some questionable
>>> code. Should be equivalent to what we had e
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 07 March 2002 3:06 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> I have a new patch... This one also cleans up some questionable code.
>> Should be equivalent to what we had earlier.
>
| string const abst = _("Abstract: ");
| string const refs = _("Refe
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 07-Mar-2002 Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> So what needs to be done to remove frontends/support? (It is now empty as
>> LyXImage has gone the way of the dodo.) Just remove directory CVS?
>
| Will we need this directory in future maybe for other stuff?
>
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 07 March 2002 2:49 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | Lars, can you shout loudly if you don't want this to go in. I don't
>> | want to jump on your toes again.
>>
>> I don't feel jumped on? It was I that "grabbed" your space, wasn't it?
>
On Thursday 07 March 2002 3:06 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I have a new patch... This one also cleans up some questionable code.
> Should be equivalent to what we had earlier.
string const abst = _("Abstract: ");
string const refs = _("References: ");
string const parlab = par->params().labe
On 07-Mar-2002 Angus Leeming wrote:
> So what needs to be done to remove frontends/support? (It is now empty as
> LyXImage has gone the way of the dodo.) Just remove directory CVS?
Will we need this directory in future maybe for other stuff?
If yes then just remove the files you don't need an
I noticed that current CVS tests for wvware presence and puts "stuff"
in lib/ and tries to compile it. Fascinating :-)
So far so good, only it doesn't seem to find the modules like support.o
etc, which are listed in $MYOBJECTS in the make file.
These files exist, but for my installation in the
I have a new patch... This one also cleans up some questionable code.
Should be equivalent to what we had earlier.
I'll also take a quick look at the line break algorithm, it fails too
often for my liking.
Index: src/buffer.C
===
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 07-Mar-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> You cannot "cvs delete" a directory. Just make sure that it is empty
>> and that you prune directories when updating...
>
| Ok then I will delete the hole directory as it is not used anymore.
You will do n
On Thursday 07 March 2002 2:49 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Lars, can you shout loudly if you don't want this to go in. I don't
> | want to jump on your toes again.
>
> I don't feel jumped on? It was I that "grabbed" your space, wasn't it?
I find that sometimes email isn't the best medium
On Thursday 07 March 2002 2:51 pm, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 07-Mar-2002 Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Jürgen,
>
> Well Angus I just updated various source files and removed print_forms and
> lyx_gui_misc. I'm ready to commit. So I'll commit this and you can then
update.
> I did not modify anything i
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 03:54:42PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> You mean here? And what do you mean LyX or the Custom Export function.
> The first is No I'm using it and friends of mine. Second is the same, just
> not in everydays work. Anyway I think we did agree that in general it's
> a nice f
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 12:24:12PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Do you feel like taking a look at this mess and submitting a patch?
>
> JMarc
>
Patch attached. Please dump ejour2 (but keep a copy stashed somewhere
just in case :-)
Martin
--- Extended.lyx.orig Thu Mar 7 15:47:
On 07-Mar-2002 John Levon wrote:
>> in everydays work (well then I don't use LyX in everydays work ;) and we
>> changed now to use StarOffice instead of LyX for writing letters.
>
> OK, so now /nobody/ uses it ?!
You mean here? And what do you mean LyX or the Custom Export function.
The first
On 07-Mar-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> You cannot "cvs delete" a directory. Just make sure that it is empty
> and that you prune directories when updating...
Ok then I will delete the hole directory as it is not used anymore.
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-.
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 02:07:53PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> in everydays work (well then I don't use LyX in everydays work ;) and we
> changed now to use StarOffice instead of LyX for writing letters.
OK, so now /nobody/ uses it ?!
regards
john
--
I am a complete moron for forgetting abo
On 07-Mar-2002 Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jürgen,
Well Angus I just updated various source files and removed print_forms and
lyx_gui_misc. I'm ready to commit. So I'll commit this and you can then update.
I did not modify anything in the patch you sent so you shouldn't have conflicts.
Is that ok?
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jürgen,
>
| shall I just commit my sendto patch myself now? I'd rather avoid any
| conflicts that'll ensue if you commit, I update and then commit the
| improvements.
If Jürgen says ok.
| Lars, can you shout loudly if you don't want this to go in. I
Jürgen,
shall I just commit my sendto patch myself now? I'd rather avoid any
conflicts that'll ensue if you commit, I update and then commit the
improvements.
Lars, can you shout loudly if you don't want this to go in. I don't want to
jump on your toes again.
Can some cvs guru tell me if "cv
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 07-Mar-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> What about this patch...
>
| Well a fast look would tell me that it could work. Just one thing
| does lyxstring have the push_back() functionallity?
sure it does.
--
Lgb
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 07 March 2002 2:15 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> I actually thingk that the whole functions should be rewritten into
>> two parts... one part that just emmits "lines" to an ostream, and
>> another that takes this stream and breaks overlo
On 07-Mar-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> What about this patch...
Well a fast look would tell me that it could work. Just one thing
does lyxstring have the push_back() functionallity?
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna
On Thursday 07 March 2002 2:15 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I actually thingk that the whole functions should be rewritten into
> two parts... one part that just emmits "lines" to an ostream, and
> another that takes this stream and breaks overlong lines.
>
> Hmm...
>
> What about this patch
Mike Meredith wrote:
> Hi
>
> Don't know if this is the right place to send this, but there's some
> instructions of mine on the Lyx Tips page which are in need of updating
> ... here's the replacement :-
[...]
done!
thanks,
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 07-Mar-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> well yes... _but_ that is not absolutely true I guess...
>>
>> I think we can have an algorithm that is almost as good without the
>> word stringstream complexity.
>>
>> (and the best would be to have a
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 07 March 2002 1:34 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> > a patch like this: (I have not even tried to compile it...)
>>
>> SIGH would you like me to have a go? Ok.
>
| Actually, having read Jürgen's response, I'm not going to do this. I don't
On 07-Mar-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> well yes... _but_ that is not absolutely true I guess...
>
> I think we can have an algorithm that is almost as good without the
> word stringstream complexity.
>
> (and the best would be to have a lyxasciistreambuf...)
Well we can have this for 1.
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 07 March 2002 1:22 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | On Thursday 07 March 2002 12:10 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> >> Do I not remember André telling me that code like this is very bad
| prac
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 07-Mar-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> - buffer << word.str() << "\n";
>> - word.str("");
>> + buffer << "\n";
>> + last_word_l
On Thursday 07 March 2002 1:34 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > a patch like this: (I have not even tried to compile it...)
>
> SIGH would you like me to have a go? Ok.
Actually, having read Jürgen's response, I'm not going to do this. I don't
want to replace one bug with another!
A
On Thursday 07 March 2002 1:22 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Thursday 07 March 2002 12:10 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >> Do I not remember André telling me that code like this is very bad
practise:
> >>
> >> ostringstream word;
> >> word << "
On 07-Mar-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Please also look at the patch that I sent to the list.
> (before applying anything)
Well I would leave you applying this patch. And as you could figure out
of my former mail your patch won't work.
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-
On 07-Mar-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> - buffer << word.str() << "\n";
> - word.str("");
> + buffer << "\n";
> + last_word_length = 0;
Well this patch will most probably f
On Thursday 07 March 2002 1:07 pm, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 06-Mar-2002 Angus Leeming wrote:
> > now I've got Jürgen's attention ;-)
>
> #:O)
>
> > Attached is a patch for a new custom export dialog such as he has wanted
oh
> > so badly these last 12 months!
>
> Well let's say that I like th
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| by using a new ostringstream (wrapped in a scoped_ptr) for each new word, I
| have resolved the random crashes/printing of suprious characters like \200
| that I was getting when exporting to ascii.
>
| Please apply.
Please also look at the patch th
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 07 March 2002 12:10 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Do I not remember André telling me that code like this is very bad practise:
>>
>> ostringstream word;
>> word << "some string";
>> ...
>> word.str("");
>
| or even
>
| word = ostringstream()
On 06-Mar-2002 Angus Leeming wrote:
> now I've got Jürgen's attention ;-)
#:O)
> Attached is a patch for a new custom export dialog such as he has wanted oh
> so badly these last 12 months!
Well let's say that I like the idea of the Custom export I don't use it
in everydays work (well then I
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 02:02:14PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I'd say this can wait until after pre1.
it can wait longer than that ! I'm not intending on submitting any sort
of patch for 1.2.0
john
--
I am a complete moron for forgetting about endianness. May I be
forever marked as
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 01:57:46PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Well nested insets are no problem you just put the paragraphs in the
> owner() and if there is no owner() (top level inset) then in the toplevel
> text. But as I said it's only possible with a special functions not in
> the same man
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> - Marking text and pressing the footnote/ margin button created an
>> inset with the marked text inside. Now an empty inset is created
>> *behind* the marked text.
>>
>> and vice versa:
>>
>> - Clicking on the button when the curso
On 07-Mar-2002 John Levon wrote:
> The 2nd part I'm not bothered about, we can't do what the reporter
> suggested since we have nested insets, and I don't think a special
> function is worth it.
Well nested insets are no problem you just put the paragraphs in the
owner() and if there is no owne
by using a new ostringstream (wrapped in a scoped_ptr) for each new word, I
have resolved the random crashes/printing of suprious characters like \200
that I was getting when exporting to ascii.
Please apply.
Angus
Index: src/ChangeLog
===
Juergen Vigna wrote:
> I would like to know if we WANT this functionality before starting to
> code it or having a look at it. The second part (vice versa) IMO that
> we should drop it or have a special function which can be called and
> the inset is droped and it's contents put on the same spot a
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 01:12:17PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> I would like to know if we WANT this functionality before starting to code
> it or having a look at it. The second part (vice versa) IMO that we should
> drop it or have a special function which can be called and the inset is
> drop
i am getting spurious recompiles of xforms/GUIRunTime.C
regards
john
--
I am a complete moron for forgetting about endianness. May I be
forever marked as such.
On Thursday 07 March 2002 12:10 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Do I not remember André telling me that code like this is very bad practise:
>
> ostringstream word;
> word << "some string";
> ...
> word.str("");
or even
word = ostringstream();
Angus
> - Marking text and pressing the footnote/ margin button created an
> inset with the marked text inside. Now an empty inset is created
> *behind* the marked text.
>
> and vice versa:
>
> - Clicking on the button when the cursor was inside an inset deleted
> the inset and switched the text
On Thursday 07 March 2002 12:03 pm, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 07-Mar-2002 Angus Leeming wrote:
> > any one else see this?
>
> I just exported the UserGuide and did not core dump and got a resonable
> .txt file. Althought I see a lot of messages "caption not found" messages.
More evidence that ou
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
