On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 04:01:31PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 16:01:31 +0900
> From: "R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Frank Derichsweiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Release LyX 1.1.6
>
> Frank Derichsweiler wrote:
> > A little problem wit
Frank Derichsweiler wrote:
> A little problem within a linux environment: Having no kernel header
> files (within /usr/src/linux) the configure script runs and produces
> the error forms.h not found, which is IMHO misleading. Perhaps the
> configure can be adopted to check for the kernel include f
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 02:39:30PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [Announce lyx 1.1.6]
After some more testing: congratulations Lyx-Team: The new version is
*much* better than 1.1.5. Especially the table code! Great.
A little problem within a linux environment: Having no kernel header
files
i just downloaded and installed lyx 1.1.6 and it automatically installed
itself to /usr/local/kde . this is interesting considering kde is not
installed on this computer. I'm running red hat linux 6.2 with kernel
2.2.18. the contents of config.log are attached. I'm running afterstep
1.8.8 as
The primary site said there was no such directory as /pub/lyx
some other sites did not have 1.1.6
gd.tuwien.ac.at finally had it.(thanks)
1.2cvs failed to View Postscript, showing only 9-11 pages of a 120 pg
doc.
This seems to be because lyx-tmpdirs in /tmp were eating 32Mb each. That
seems a bit
Hi.
I am a lowly user, but I've had a lot of trouble with 1.1.6:
1. No matter what, I get lots of errors like the following in my xterm.
LyX: Bad integer `0' [around line 14 of file
/usr/local/lyx/share/lyx/layouts/stdlayouts.inc]
LyX: Bad integer `1' [around line 21 of file
/usr/local/lyx/sh
I get this while spell checking.
Also crashed when trying to set the spellchecker language to canadian.
configure --with-pspell
I did not have this problem using aspell before I configured
--with-pspell, so I'll go back to that and see if the problem persists.
This is with the final version of 1.1
Roland Krause wrote:
>
> I'd say, lets move on from this crap. Require make-3.79 on solaris. Be
> done with it.
>
> Roland
Do everybody a favour and require it across the board. We won't be
alone. I already had to ugrade for some other pkg.
Garst
Hi Allan,
thanks for the response
Allan wrote:
> According to other reports we have, we only had to remove the ':' for
> Sun's make to be happy. It may be a version thing I suppose.
I dont really know, I got an update from cvs, trying to build with
native make (/usr/ccs/bin/make) does still not
Dear Lars,
dear listmembers,
many thanks for the input. The string as given works fine for Lyx 1.1.6; even
/usr/lib/X11/app-defaults/LyX is parsed - this is what makes me happy. However,
two remarks:
- the old version of mine (1.1.4 fix3; S.u.S.E supplied binary) does *not*
accept the strings you
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 02:30:55AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> I have removed all !NEW_INSETS cruft from the sources in the
> BRANCH_new_insets branch. It seems to me that it works very well but
> I'd like to have some more testers.
>
> SGML might also be a problem.
I know, I will w
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" a écrit :
> ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I've jumpped from lyx-1.1.5fix1 to lyx-1.1.6, and I have some remarks
> | about the DocBook class:
>
> You really should have tested 1.1.6pre3, then we could have caught
> this before release... actually it seems that _no_ do
12 matches
Mail list logo
