Hi!
Is there any use case where a user wants to omit "-f"?
Yesterday I've wasted a few hours with finding out why LXC set up a
broken container.
Then I found out that I've created it using "lxc-create -n foo
foo.cfg" instead of "lxc-create -n foo -f foo.cfg".
--
Thanks,
//richard
--
On 05/28/2012 06:02 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is there any use case where a user wants to omit "-f"?
> Yesterday I've wasted a few hours with finding out why LXC set up a
> broken container.
> Then I found out that I've created it using "lxc-create -n foo
> foo.cfg" instead of "
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> At least in Ubuntu -f isn't mandatory because calling lxc-create without
> it will simply default to a system wide configuration in /etc/lxc/lxc.conf.
Is this really useful?
My openSUSE system does not have /etc/lxc/lxc.conf,
so lxc-creat
On 05/28/2012 06:29 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
>> At least in Ubuntu -f isn't mandatory because calling lxc-create without
>> it will simply default to a system wide configuration in /etc/lxc/lxc.conf.
>
> Is this really useful?
>
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On 05/28/2012 06:29 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Stéphane Graber
>> wrote:
>>> At least in Ubuntu -f isn't mandatory because calling lxc-create without
>>> it will simply default to a system wid
On 29.05.2012 02:02, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is there any use case where a user wants to omit "-f"?
In my case I didn't use -f, but later resorted to using
-f /dev/null to be sure. So this is yet another "me too",
I guess. Maybe there should be more well-defined behavour
about
