On 29.05.2012 02:02, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > Hi! > > Is there any use case where a user wants to omit "-f"?
In my case I didn't use -f, but later resorted to using -f /dev/null to be sure. So this is yet another "me too", I guess. Maybe there should be more well-defined behavour about what it does, exactly, if not -f option is given. > Yesterday I've wasted a few hours with finding out why LXC set up a > broken container. > Then I found out that I've created it using "lxc-create -n foo > foo.cfg" instead of "lxc-create -n foo -f foo.cfg". Shouldn't it complain about this in the first place? Thanks, /mjt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
