On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:47:47AM +0200, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc-create.in b/src/lxc/lxc-create.in
> index bd9a438..89f0889 100644
> --- a/src/lxc/lxc-create.in
> +++ b/src/lxc/lxc-create.in
> @@ -136,6 +136,12 @@ while true; do
> esac
> done
>
> +if [
Quoting richard -rw- weinberger (richard.weinber...@gmail.com):
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:36 AM, richard -rw- weinberger
> wrote:
> > Found the problem, patch is in the way!
> >
>
> *grr*, forgot that this list is moderated.
>
> --
>
> Using this patch is it possible to catch usage errors li
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:36 AM, richard -rw- weinberger
wrote:
> Found the problem, patch is in the way!
>
*grr*, forgot that this list is moderated.
--
Using this patch is it possible to catch usage errors like:
lxc-create -n foo foo.cfg
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger
---
src/lxc/lxc-c
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> Yesterday I've wasted a few hours with finding out why LXC set up a
>> broken container.
>> Then I found out that I've created it using "lxc-create -n foo
>> foo.cfg" instead of "lxc-create -n foo -f foo.cfg".
>
> Shouldn't it complain abo
On 29.05.2012 02:02, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is there any use case where a user wants to omit "-f"?
In my case I didn't use -f, but later resorted to using
-f /dev/null to be sure. So this is yet another "me too",
I guess. Maybe there should be more well-defined behavour
about
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On 05/28/2012 06:29 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Stéphane Graber
>> wrote:
>>> At least in Ubuntu -f isn't mandatory because calling lxc-create without
>>> it will simply default to a system wid
On 05/28/2012 06:29 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
>> At least in Ubuntu -f isn't mandatory because calling lxc-create without
>> it will simply default to a system wide configuration in /etc/lxc/lxc.conf.
>
> Is this really useful?
>
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> At least in Ubuntu -f isn't mandatory because calling lxc-create without
> it will simply default to a system wide configuration in /etc/lxc/lxc.conf.
Is this really useful?
My openSUSE system does not have /etc/lxc/lxc.conf,
so lxc-creat
On 05/28/2012 06:02 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is there any use case where a user wants to omit "-f"?
> Yesterday I've wasted a few hours with finding out why LXC set up a
> broken container.
> Then I found out that I've created it using "lxc-create -n foo
> foo.cfg" instead of "
