Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1 pull request

2012-12-13 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 12/13/2012 03:59 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 12/10/2012 11:36 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> You'll find the 0.9.alpha1 pull request below. >> >> Based on what you had to do last time in Copenhagen, I believe the >> following actions are to be done on your side: >> >> - Prope

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1 pull request

2012-12-13 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 12/10/2012 11:36 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > You'll find the 0.9.alpha1 pull request below. > > Based on what you had to do last time in Copenhagen, I believe the > following actions are to be done on your side: > > - Properly tag 0.8, currently we only have a commit but no matc

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1 pull request

2012-12-11 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 12/11/2012 10:07 AM, Frederic Crozat wrote: > Le mardi 11 décembre 2012 à 09:56 -0500, Stéphane Graber a écrit : >> On 12/11/2012 09:35 AM, Frederic Crozat wrote: >>> Le mardi 11 décembre 2012 à 09:23 -0500, Stéphane Graber a écrit : On 12/11/2012 05:12 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 12

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1 pull request

2012-12-11 Thread Frederic Crozat
Le mardi 11 décembre 2012 à 09:56 -0500, Stéphane Graber a écrit : > On 12/11/2012 09:35 AM, Frederic Crozat wrote: > > Le mardi 11 décembre 2012 à 09:23 -0500, Stéphane Graber a écrit : > >> On 12/11/2012 05:12 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > >>> On 12/10/2012 11:36 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote: > H

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1 pull request

2012-12-11 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 12/11/2012 09:35 AM, Frederic Crozat wrote: > Le mardi 11 décembre 2012 à 09:23 -0500, Stéphane Graber a écrit : >> On 12/11/2012 05:12 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>> On 12/10/2012 11:36 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote: Hi Daniel, You'll find the 0.9.alpha1 pull request below.

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1 pull request

2012-12-11 Thread Frederic Crozat
Le mardi 11 décembre 2012 à 09:23 -0500, Stéphane Graber a écrit : > On 12/11/2012 05:12 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > On 12/10/2012 11:36 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote: > >> Hi Daniel, > >> > >> You'll find the 0.9.alpha1 pull request below. > >> > >> Based on what you had to do last time in Copenhage

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1 pull request

2012-12-11 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 12/11/2012 05:12 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 12/10/2012 11:36 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> You'll find the 0.9.alpha1 pull request below. >> >> Based on what you had to do last time in Copenhagen, I believe the >> following actions are to be done on your side: >> >> - Prope

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1 pull request

2012-12-11 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 12/10/2012 11:36 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > You'll find the 0.9.alpha1 pull request below. > > Based on what you had to do last time in Copenhagen, I believe the > following actions are to be done on your side: > > - Properly tag 0.8, currently we only have a commit but no matc

[lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1 pull request

2012-12-10 Thread Stéphane Graber
Hi Daniel, You'll find the 0.9.alpha1 pull request below. Based on what you had to do last time in Copenhagen, I believe the following actions are to be done on your side: - Properly tag 0.8, currently we only have a commit but no matching tag, this should be fixed before pulling from stagin

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1

2012-12-10 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 12/10/2012 12:59 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 12:36 -0500, Stéphane Graber wrote: >> On 12/10/2012 12:30 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: >>> On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 12:09 -0500, Dwight Engen wrote: On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:35:17 -0500 Stéphane Graber wrote: >

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1

2012-12-10 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 12:36 -0500, Stéphane Graber wrote: > On 12/10/2012 12:30 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 12:09 -0500, Dwight Engen wrote: > >> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:35:17 -0500 > >> Stéphane Graber wrote: > >> > >>> On 12/05/2012 11:54 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote: >

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1

2012-12-10 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 12/10/2012 12:30 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 12:09 -0500, Dwight Engen wrote: >> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:35:17 -0500 >> Stéphane Graber wrote: >> >>> On 12/05/2012 11:54 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote: Hello, After discussing this briefly with Daniel, I wante

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1

2012-12-10 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 12:09 -0500, Dwight Engen wrote: > On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:35:17 -0500 > Stéphane Graber wrote: > > > On 12/05/2012 11:54 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > After discussing this briefly with Daniel, I wanted to make all of > > > you aware that we are curren

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1

2012-12-10 Thread Dwight Engen
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:35:17 -0500 Stéphane Graber wrote: > On 12/05/2012 11:54 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote: > > Hello, > > > > After discussing this briefly with Daniel, I wanted to make all of > > you aware that we are currently planning on sending a pull request > > of the staging branch on the

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1

2012-12-10 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 12/05/2012 11:54 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote: > Hello, > > After discussing this briefly with Daniel, I wanted to make all of you > aware that we are currently planning on sending a pull request of the > staging branch on the 10th of December (next Monday). > > This pull request will very likely

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1

2012-12-06 Thread Dwight Engen
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 12:46:28 -0500 Dwight Engen wrote: > On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:30:18 -0500 > "Michael H. Warfield" wrote: > > > Deep down below... A correction... > > > > On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 11:57 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > > On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 11:54 -0500, Stéphane Graber wro

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1

2012-12-06 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 12:46 -0500, Dwight Engen wrote: > On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:30:18 -0500 > "Michael H. Warfield" wrote: > Yeah, the duplicates are just warnings, but we probably should fix it by > listing the files individually instead of using the glob. > > > > Also got a /usr/local/var/li

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1

2012-12-06 Thread Dwight Engen
On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:30:18 -0500 "Michael H. Warfield" wrote: > Deep down below... A correction... > > On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 11:57 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 11:54 -0500, Stéphane Graber wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > After discussing this briefly with Daniel,

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1

2012-12-06 Thread Michael H. Warfield
Deep down below... A correction... On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 11:57 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 11:54 -0500, Stéphane Graber wrote: > > Hello, > > > After discussing this briefly with Daniel, I wanted to make all of you > > aware that we are currently planning on sending

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1

2012-12-06 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 11:54 -0500, Stéphane Graber wrote: > Hello, > After discussing this briefly with Daniel, I wanted to make all of you > aware that we are currently planning on sending a pull request of the > staging branch on the 10th of December (next Monday). > This pull request will very

[lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1

2012-12-05 Thread Stéphane Graber
Hello, After discussing this briefly with Daniel, I wanted to make all of you aware that we are currently planning on sending a pull request of the staging branch on the 10th of December (next Monday). This pull request will very likely contain everything that's currently in the staging branch an