On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 12:36 -0500, Stéphane Graber wrote: > On 12/10/2012 12:30 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 12:09 -0500, Dwight Engen wrote: > >> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:35:17 -0500 > >> Stéphane Graber <stgra...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On 12/05/2012 11:54 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote: > >>>> Hello, > >>>> > >>>> After discussing this briefly with Daniel, I wanted to make all of > >>>> you aware that we are currently planning on sending a pull request > >>>> of the staging branch on the 10th of December (next Monday). > >>>> > >>>> This pull request will very likely contain everything that's > >>>> currently in the staging branch and is intended to become > >>>> 0.9.alpha1. > >>>> > >>>> I'd therefore recommend everyone tests the current staging branch > >>>> and sends any remaining bugfixes to the mailing list as soon as > >>>> possible. > >>>> > >>>> Also, if a change you sent to the mailing-list hasn't been applied > >>>> yet, it's very likely because I missed it as according to my mail > >>>> client, there's no outstanding patch to review. In such case, > >>>> please reply to this e-mail with a reference to your change and > >>>> I'll make sure it's reviewed before I send the pull request. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>> > >>> As far as I'm concerned, the staging branch is now ready for the > >>> release of 0.9.alpha1. > >>> > >>> I plan on sending the merge proposal later this afternoon > >>> (in 5-6 hours) after I've run some more tests on it. > >>> > >>> Test packages for Ubuntu can be found at: > >>> https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-lxc/+archive/daily/+packages > >>> > >>> > >>> If you're aware of any critical bug currently affecting staging, > >>> please speak up now :) > > > >> Its not critical, but I think the above patch that replaces @LXCPATH@ > >> with %{_localstatedir}/* in the spec file should go in to fix building > >> on Fedora. It'd be nice to hear an ack from Michael though :) > > > > Aaaahhhh! I meant to test that patch and got distracted. Just tested. > > Everything worked and the builds went fine on F17. I'm good with it. > > The current staging plus that change builds Fedora rpms just fine. > > > > Acked-by: Michael H. Warfield <m...@wittsend.com> > > > > Regards, > > Mike
> Took a bit of digging to find what patch you were referring to but I > think I picked up the right one and pushed to staging :) Tested. And we are good. Only thing in there is adjusting for the version number (it currently claims 0.8.0) but that's normal for any build spec in my experience. > Thanks Regards, Mike -- Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 | m...@wittsend.com /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/ NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all PGP Key: 0x674627FF | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
_______________________________________________ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
