On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:05:53 -0500
Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> > On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:24:43 -0500
> > Serge Hallyn wrote:
> >
> > > Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> > > > On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:22:47 -0500
> > > > Serge Hallyn wrot
Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:24:43 -0500
> Serge Hallyn wrote:
>
> > Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> > > On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:22:47 -0500
> > > Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > >
> > > > Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com):
> > >
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:24:43 -0500
Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> > On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:22:47 -0500
> > Serge Hallyn wrote:
> >
> > > Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com):
> > > > To add to the "you broke my lxc-create" list, the new version
Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:22:47 -0500
> Serge Hallyn wrote:
>
> > Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com):
> > > To add to the "you broke my lxc-create" list, the new version also
> > > dropped the fancy header I introduced a while back (showin
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:22:47 -0500
Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com):
> > To add to the "you broke my lxc-create" list, the new version also
> > dropped the fancy header I introduced a while back (showing the
> > template name, the arguments passed to it and the
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 09:22:47AM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com):
> > To add to the "you broke my lxc-create" list, the new version also
> > dropped the fancy header I introduced a while back (showing the template
> > name, the arguments passed to it and
Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com):
> To add to the "you broke my lxc-create" list, the new version also
> dropped the fancy header I introduced a while back (showing the template
> name, the arguments passed to it and the checksum of the template used
> at the time.
>
> An example was:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 09:28:52PM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Qiang Huang (h.huangqi...@huawei.com):
> > On 2013/7/10 22:30, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > > Quoting Qiang Huang (h.huangqi...@huawei.com):
> > >> On 2013/7/10 6:05, Dwight Engen wrote:
> > >>> Hi guys,
> > >>>
> > >>> Just curious
Quoting Qiang Huang (h.huangqi...@huawei.com):
> On 2013/7/10 22:30, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Qiang Huang (h.huangqi...@huawei.com):
> >> On 2013/7/10 6:05, Dwight Engen wrote:
> >>> Hi guys,
> >>>
> >>> Just curious, has there been any thought about doing any more lxc versions
> >>> 0.9.x b
On 2013/7/10 22:30, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Qiang Huang (h.huangqi...@huawei.com):
>> On 2013/7/10 6:05, Dwight Engen wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> Just curious, has there been any thought about doing any more lxc versions
>>> 0.9.x before lxc 1.0? Seems like a few things have accumulated since
Quoting Qiang Huang (h.huangqi...@huawei.com):
> On 2013/7/10 6:05, Dwight Engen wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Just curious, has there been any thought about doing any more lxc versions
> > 0.9.x before lxc 1.0? Seems like a few things have accumulated since 0.9.0.
> > Just pulled this out of git fo
Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com):
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:05:28PM -0400, Dwight Engen wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Just curious, has there been any thought about doing any more lxc versions
> > 0.9.x before lxc 1.0? Seems like a few things have accumulated since 0.9.0.
> > Just pu
On 2013/7/10 6:05, Dwight Engen wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Just curious, has there been any thought about doing any more lxc versions
> 0.9.x before lxc 1.0? Seems like a few things have accumulated since 0.9.0.
> Just pulled this out of git for perspective:
>
> Name Commits Diffstat
> 0.7.01
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 18:15 -0400, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:05:28PM -0400, Dwight Engen wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Just curious, has there been any thought about doing any more lxc versions
> > 0.9.x before lxc 1.0? Seems like a few things have accumulated since 0.9.0.
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:05:28PM -0400, Dwight Engen wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Just curious, has there been any thought about doing any more lxc versions
> 0.9.x before lxc 1.0? Seems like a few things have accumulated since 0.9.0.
> Just pulled this out of git for perspective:
>
> Name Commits
Hi guys,
Just curious, has there been any thought about doing any more lxc versions
0.9.x before lxc 1.0? Seems like a few things have accumulated since 0.9.0.
Just pulled this out of git for perspective:
Name Commits Diffstat
0.7.0140 84 files changed, 4952 insertions(+), 2957 dele
16 matches
Mail list logo