Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH] Fix check for openpty

2013-01-14 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com): > On 01/11/2013 11:17 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com): > >> The previous implementation of the openpty check was always returning > >> 'no' as openpty is typically defined in util. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Stép

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH] Fix check for openpty

2013-01-11 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 01/11/2013 11:17 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com): >> The previous implementation of the openpty check was always returning >> 'no' as openpty is typically defined in util. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stéphane Graber > > But if I read the docs right > (http://ww

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH] Fix check for openpty

2013-01-11 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com): > The previous implementation of the openpty check was always returning > 'no' as openpty is typically defined in util. > > Signed-off-by: Stéphane Graber But if I read the docs right (http://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/autoconf/manual/autoco

[lxc-devel] [PATCH] Fix check for openpty

2013-01-11 Thread Stéphane Graber
The previous implementation of the openpty check was always returning 'no' as openpty is typically defined in util. Signed-off-by: Stéphane Graber --- configure.ac | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index dd50701..d1f5ad9 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++