On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:51:36PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Serge E. Hallyn" writes:
>
> > Quoting Andy Lutomirski (l...@amacapital.net):
> >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Janne Karhunen
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Sep 2
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:19:58AM +0300, Janne Karhunen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
>
> >> - We can relay a call of /sbin/hotplug from outside of a container
> >> to inside of a container based on policy.
> >> (B
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 08:37:19AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 10:07 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 08:01:31PM +0300, Janne Karhunen wrote:
> > > That being said, our wish would be to support any combination of
> > &g
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 10:28:55PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 02:34:54PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > So the big issues for a device namespac
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:25:56AM +0300, Janne Karhunen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
>
> >> In summary the situation with device hoptlug and containers sucks today,
> >> and we need to do something. Running a linux deskt
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 08:01:31PM +0300, Janne Karhunen wrote:
> That being said, our wish would be to support any combination of
> OS's and frankly, I'd be slightly annoyed to tell the customer that
> they can't do two Androids or we magically run out of bits.
If you want to support "any" combin
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 02:34:54PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> So the big issues for a device namespace to solve are filtering which
> devices a container has access to and being able to dynamically change
> which devices those are at run time (aka hotplug).
As _all_ devices are hotpluggable
