On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:25:56AM +0300, Janne Karhunen wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > >> In summary the situation with device hoptlug and containers sucks today, > >> and we need to do something. Running a linux desktop in a container is > >> a reasonably good example use case. > > > > No it isn't. I'd argue that this is a horrible use case, one that you > > shouldn't do. Why not just use multi-head machines like people do who > > really want to do this, relying on user separation? That's a workable > > solution that is quite common and works very well today. > > I suppose so, but now you take the assumption that there is no > need for running multiple Linux variants on the same host (say > Ubuntu and Android side by side). Is this something you would > not like to see done?
You can do that today without any need for device namespaces, so why is this an issue here? greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
