Adjust code for Lua 5.2 and keep compatibility with Lua 5.1.
We also fix a bug in the parsing of /proc/mounts while here.
Signed-off-by: Natanael Copa
---
src/lua-lxc/core.c | 10 --
src/lua-lxc/lxc.lua | 18 ++
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 05:14:49PM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com):
> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 11:05:02AM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > before I go on with the snapshots-in-api patchset, I wanted to floar
> > > this and ask a few quest
Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com):
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 11:05:02AM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > before I go on with the snapshots-in-api patchset, I wanted to floar
> > this and ask a few questions, as I'm having a hard time deciding how
> > we want to talk over the
Signed-off-by: Dwight Engen
---
src/lxc/lxclock.c | 10 +-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/lxc/lxclock.c b/src/lxc/lxclock.c
index dea6941..79ebf84 100644
--- a/src/lxc/lxclock.c
+++ b/src/lxc/lxclock.c
@@ -122,6 +122,10 @@ struct lxc_lock *lxc_newlock(con
Quoting Thomas Moschny (thomas.mosc...@gmail.com):
> Hi,
>
> in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003136 , a Fedora LXC
> user reports a problem with lxc-destroy removing parts of his host
> file system.
>
> He's using 0.8.0, and the obvious advice for him is to try with 0.9.0
> (which
Branch: refs/heads/staging
Home: https://github.com/lxc/lxc
Commit: 75b5535282453b3442a41df4a3ba6d3058cd6e48
https://github.com/lxc/lxc/commit/75b5535282453b3442a41df4a3ba6d3058cd6e48
Author: Natanael Copa
Date: 2013-09-04 (Wed, 04 Sep 2013)
Changed paths:
M templates/lx
Quoting Natanael Copa (nc...@alpinelinux.org):
> We already add harware address for a single veth interface. Do the same
> with a single macvlan interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Natanael Copa
Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn
> ---
> templates/lxc-alpine.in | 8 +---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tony Su
Date: Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Lxc-users] Working LXC templates?
To: m...@wittsend.com
Cc: Frederic Crozat , lxc-users
, lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Thx for the thoughts, Michael...
Would like to know specifically what
We already add harware address for a single veth interface. Do the same
with a single macvlan interface.
Signed-off-by: Natanael Copa
---
templates/lxc-alpine.in | 8 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/templates/lxc-alpine.in b/templates/lxc-alpine.in
index 2a
Quoting S.Çağlar Onur (cag...@10ur.org):
> Signed-off-by: S.Çağlar Onur
Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn
> ---
> src/lxc/bdev.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/lxc/bdev.c b/src/lxc/bdev.c
> index 39592b2..b45f2cb 100644
> --- a/src/lxc/bdev.c
> +++ b/src/
Branch: refs/heads/staging
Home: https://github.com/lxc/lxc
Commit: e34b5d2ef2c329afe6540bbfc298ae631378832e
https://github.com/lxc/lxc/commit/e34b5d2ef2c329afe6540bbfc298ae631378832e
Author: S.Çağlar Onur
Date: 2013-09-04 (Wed, 04 Sep 2013)
Changed paths:
M src/lxc/bdev
On Wed, 04 Sep 2013 09:40:49 -0400
"Michael H. Warfield" wrote:
> I do think it is an issue with the whole "distribution agnostic
> template" problem that may require some help from the distros or some
> innovative ideas of how we can bootstrap distros using distro agnostic
> tools (like stone k
This issue really belongs on -devel since it's a template development
issue that really impacts all the template writers.
On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 09:26 -0700, Tony Su wrote:
> Thx all for the replies,
> - lxc-version returns 0.8.0. Looking around, there might be a more current
> unstable, but AFAIK
> In addition, I'll add lxcapi_snapshot_destroy(), which will look like:
>
> c = lxc_container_new("c0", "/var/lib/lxc");
> c->snapshot_destroy(c, "snap1");
> lxc_container_put(c);
>
> As for snapshot_list, I'm thinking it will just look like:
>
> c = lxc_container_new("c
Hi,
before I go on with the snapshots-in-api patchset, I wanted to floar
this and ask a few questions, as I'm having a hard time deciding how
we want to talk over the API.
(Though as I've been typing this out, I think I now see how I want it
to look.)
First, the basics: if you have lxcpath=/var
Hi,
in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003136 , a Fedora LXC
user reports a problem with lxc-destroy removing parts of his host
file system.
He's using 0.8.0, and the obvious advice for him is to try with 0.9.0
(which I am currently building packages of), but that said, the
problem i
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 11:05:02AM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> before I go on with the snapshots-in-api patchset, I wanted to floar
> this and ask a few questions, as I'm having a hard time deciding how
> we want to talk over the API.
>
> (Though as I've been typing this out, I think I n
17 matches
Mail list logo
