> In addition, I'll add lxcapi_snapshot_destroy(), which will look like:
>
> c = lxc_container_new("c0", "/var/lib/lxc");
> c->snapshot_destroy(c, "snap1");
> lxc_container_put(c);
>
> As for snapshot_list, I'm thinking it will just look like:
>
> c = lxc_container_new("c0", "/var/lib/lxc");
> ns = c->snapshot_entries(c, NULL, 0);
> for (i=0; i<ns; i++) {
> c2 = c->get_snapshot(c, i);
> printf("name is %s, lxcpath %s\n", c->name, c->config_path);
> lxc_container_put(c2);
> }
> lxc_container_put(c);
>
> with 'timestamp' and 'comment_file' fields being added to struct
> container_struct, usually both NULL.
No, I guess it's better to have a
struct lxc_snapshot {
// restore the container as a real container in lxcpath
struct lxc_container *(*restore)(char *name);
char *(*get_comment)(void);
char *(*timestamp)(void);
// return a lxc_container for the snapshot itself
struct lxc_container *(*open)(void);
bool (*destroy)(void);
};
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies
and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step
tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Lxc-devel mailing list
Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
