> Thanks for the scenario, I tried it here and it is working for me (ie.
> gnome-terminal, mosh to server, then screen lxc-console -n -t 0,
> then resize gnome-terminal). I did see something else though far more
> concerning: in this scenario resizing the gnome-terminal made lxc-start
> appear to
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 17:18:03 -0500
Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> > On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:49:07 -0500
> > Serge Hallyn wrote:
> >
> > > Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> > > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:55:08 -0500
> > > > Serge Hallyn wrot
Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:49:07 -0500
> Serge Hallyn wrote:
>
> > Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:55:08 -0500
> > > Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > >
> > > > Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> > >
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:49:07 -0500
Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> > On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:55:08 -0500
> > Serge Hallyn wrote:
> >
> > > Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> > > > Add a higher level console API that opens a tty/console and
>
Quoting Song Tan (belongtos...@gmail.com):
> Hello everyone,
> I am new to lxc and right now I am trying to find out how the freeze and
> unfreeze functions are implemented.
> I have read the freezer.c file in the lxc source, but I still don't
> quite get it. From my understanding, this should
Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:55:08 -0500
> Serge Hallyn wrote:
>
> > Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> > > Add a higher level console API that opens a tty/console and runs the
> > > mainloop as well. Rename existing API to console_getfd(
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:55:08 -0500
Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> > Add a higher level console API that opens a tty/console and runs the
> > mainloop as well. Rename existing API to console_getfd(). Use these
> > in the python binding.
> >
> > Allow attac
Hello everyone,
I am new to lxc and right now I am trying to find out how the freeze and
unfreeze functions are implemented.
I have read the freezer.c file in the lxc source, but I still don't
quite get it. From my understanding, this should be something about process
scheduling but I am not s
Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> Add a higher level console API that opens a tty/console and runs the
> mainloop as well. Rename existing API to console_getfd(). Use these in
> the python binding.
>
> Allow attaching a console peer after container bootup, including if the
> contai
Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> Add a higher level console API that opens a tty/console and runs the
> mainloop as well. Rename existing API to console_getfd(). Use these in
> the python binding.
>
> Allow attaching a console peer after container bootup, including if the
> contai
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:52:44AM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>
> I originally forgot to set ret = 0 if it succeeded, meaning that a
> simple 'lxc-stop -n container1' returns failure even though the
> stop succeeded.
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn
Acked-by: Stéphane Graber
> ---
> src/lxc/l
I originally forgot to set ret = 0 if it succeeded, meaning that a
simple 'lxc-stop -n container1' returns failure even though the
stop succeeded.
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn
---
src/lxc/lxc_stop.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc_stop.c b/src/lx
Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com):
> Sounds good. Only failure case would be if /proc doesn't exist in the host
> rootfs, but that's pretty unlikely to ever be the case considering the host
> wouldn't be terribly likely to even boot should that be the case.
Yeah it might be worth simpl
Sounds good. Only failure case would be if /proc doesn't exist in the host
rootfs, but that's pretty unlikely to ever be the case considering the host
wouldn't be terribly likely to even boot should that be the case.
Acked-by: Stéphane Graber
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 09:34:06AM -0500, Serge Hally
otherwise we won't be allowed to set an apparmor context (on pid 1)
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn
---
src/lxc/conf.c |8 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/lxc/conf.c b/src/lxc/conf.c
index a1aee14..4e3d605 100644
--- a/src/lxc/conf.c
+++ b/src/lxc/conf.
Quoting Qiang Huang (h.huangqi...@huawei.com):
> Right now if we use lxc-execute without log level set, we get error:
> lxc: invalid log priority NOTSET.
> Because we set log level manually in execute_start(), but didn't
> check if we have a valid log level or not, so fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qi
Quoting Weng Meiling (wengmeiling.w...@huawei.com):
>
> From: Weng Meiling
>
> When we use lxc-ps to show the process, it's more appropriate to
> show process when container is frozen.
>
> Signed-off-by: Weng Meiling
Makes sense to me.
Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn
> ---
> src/lxc/lxc-ps.in
Quoting Weng Meiling (wengmeiling.w...@huawei.com):
>
> From: Weng Meiling
>
> Signed-off-by: Weng Meiling
> ---
> src/lxc/lxc_create.c |3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc_create.c b/src/lxc/lxc_create.c
> index c9231ef..41efeaf 100644
>
Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> Signed-off-by: Dwight Engen
Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn
> ---
> src/lxc/lxccontainer.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c b/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c
> index cf5252b..c8fc16f 100644
> ---
19 matches
Mail list logo