On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:52:44AM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> 
> I originally forgot to set ret = 0 if it succeeded, meaning that a
> simple 'lxc-stop -n container1' returns failure even though the
> stop succeeded.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hal...@ubuntu.com>

Acked-by: Stéphane Graber <stgra...@ubuntu.com>

> ---
>  src/lxc/lxc_stop.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc_stop.c b/src/lxc/lxc_stop.c
> index 3d42d0e..d7f8d7f 100644
> --- a/src/lxc/lxc_stop.c
> +++ b/src/lxc/lxc_stop.c
> @@ -166,7 +166,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>                       ret = c->wait(c, "STOPPED", -1) ? 0 : -1;
>               else
>                       ret = -1; // fail
> -     }
> +     } else
> +             ret = 0;
>  
>  out:
>       lxc_container_put(c);
> -- 
> 1.8.1.2
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
> 
> Build for Windows Store.
> 
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Lxc-devel mailing list
> Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Lxc-devel mailing list
Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel

Reply via email to