[lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1 pull request

2012-12-10 Thread Stéphane Graber
Hi Daniel, You'll find the 0.9.alpha1 pull request below. Based on what you had to do last time in Copenhagen, I believe the following actions are to be done on your side: - Properly tag 0.8, currently we only have a commit but no matching tag, this should be fixed before pulling from stagin

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1

2012-12-10 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 12/10/2012 12:59 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 12:36 -0500, Stéphane Graber wrote: >> On 12/10/2012 12:30 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: >>> On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 12:09 -0500, Dwight Engen wrote: On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:35:17 -0500 Stéphane Graber wrote: >

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1

2012-12-10 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 12:36 -0500, Stéphane Graber wrote: > On 12/10/2012 12:30 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 12:09 -0500, Dwight Engen wrote: > >> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:35:17 -0500 > >> Stéphane Graber wrote: > >> > >>> On 12/05/2012 11:54 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote: >

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1

2012-12-10 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 12/10/2012 12:30 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 12:09 -0500, Dwight Engen wrote: >> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:35:17 -0500 >> Stéphane Graber wrote: >> >>> On 12/05/2012 11:54 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote: Hello, After discussing this briefly with Daniel, I wante

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1

2012-12-10 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 12:09 -0500, Dwight Engen wrote: > On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:35:17 -0500 > Stéphane Graber wrote: > > > On 12/05/2012 11:54 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > After discussing this briefly with Daniel, I wanted to make all of > > > you aware that we are curren

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1

2012-12-10 Thread Dwight Engen
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:35:17 -0500 Stéphane Graber wrote: > On 12/05/2012 11:54 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote: > > Hello, > > > > After discussing this briefly with Daniel, I wanted to make all of > > you aware that we are currently planning on sending a pull request > > of the staging branch on the

Re: [lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1

2012-12-10 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 12/05/2012 11:54 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote: > Hello, > > After discussing this briefly with Daniel, I wanted to make all of you > aware that we are currently planning on sending a pull request of the > staging branch on the 10th of December (next Monday). > > This pull request will very likely

Re: [lxc-devel] API wishlist

2012-12-10 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com): > > I think the naming of /etc/lxc/lxc.conf was rather bad and I should > > have thought of that back then :) > > Essentially our current /etc/lxc/lxc.conf should really be > > /etc/lxc/default.conf, clearly identifying that it's the default > > confi

Re: [lxc-devel] API wishlist

2012-12-10 Thread Dwight Engen
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:44:26 -0500 Stéphane Graber wrote: > On 12/10/2012 09:30 AM, Dwight Engen wrote: > > On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:47:59 -0500 > > Stéphane Graber wrote: > > > >> On 12/07/2012 12:25 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > >>> Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com): > >>> ... > -

Re: [lxc-devel] API wishlist

2012-12-10 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 12/10/2012 09:30 AM, Dwight Engen wrote: > On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:47:59 -0500 > Stéphane Graber wrote: > >> On 12/07/2012 12:25 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: >>> Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com): >>> ... - get_version() (not container specific) - get_lxc_path() (not containe

Re: [lxc-devel] API wishlist

2012-12-10 Thread Dwight Engen
On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:47:59 -0500 Stéphane Graber wrote: > On 12/07/2012 12:25 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com): > > ... > >> - get_version() (not container specific) > >> - get_lxc_path() (not container specific) > >>Returns the storage path for th

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Add mount hook script to provide systemd containers with minimal /dev

2012-12-10 Thread Stéphane Graber
I don't believe this is the right way to fix your problem. Serge and Michael spent quite a while discussing this issue and coming up with lxc.autodev that's been merged a couple of weeks ago in the staging branch and does pretty much the same thing as your change, but the "right way" directly in l

Re: [lxc-devel] API wishlist

2012-12-10 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Frederic Crozat (fcro...@suse.com): > I have to agree with that proposal (and making configuration path being > optionally a different path than the one used for rootfs would be a > plus, like the patch Alexey has been posting for a long time and we are > using on SLES). Can you post a URL

Re: [lxc-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Add mount hook script to provide systemd containers with minimal /dev

2012-12-10 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Alexander Vladimirov (alexander.idkfa.vladimi...@gmail.com): Is there any reason why the lxc.autodev config option (in git://github.com/lxc/lxc.git#staging) does not suffice? -serge > --- > Makefile.am | 4 ++-- > configure.ac | 4 > hooks/Makefile.am | 4 > hook