[lwip-users] lwip netconn with ethernet disconnect

receive mailbox through netconn_recv. What is the expected behavior when the cable is removed? I would have expected the blocking  netconn_recv to return with an error. Thanks in advance for any help. Jim ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users

RE: [lwip-users] Lwip 1.3.0 Running out of TCP PCB's fast

This is due to pcbs being placed in a TIME_WAIT state; i.e. when you close a connection they're not really freed yet, they're hanging around waiting for enough time to pass to make sure no stray packets come in and screw up a future connection. Note that the default 'enough time' is like two hours

RE: [lwip-users] scribblewiki down

Funny you mentioned a logo... I noticed the lack of a logo with the new wiki site also, and have begun working on something... How does everyone feel about a hummingbird for a lwIP mascot? Lightweight, fast, doesn't consume much in the way of resources... And it flies!!! I think it's a suitable fit

RE: [lwip-users] scribblewiki down

0 FMC Technologies Measurement Solutions Inc. 1602 Wagner Avenue | Erie PA | 16510 USA Phone: 814 898 5000 | Fax: 814 899-3414 www.fmctechnologies.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pettinato, Jim Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008

RE: [lwip-users] scribblewiki down

ote: > I like to see lwIP logo too :) Your hummingbird is nice, but I miss > compactness and simplicity in it. But I am not graphic designer, just > trying to imagine :) > > > 2008/9/25 Pettinato, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> Sample of 1st pass rough draft of l

RE: [lwip-users] scribblewiki down

, Pettinato, Jim wrote: > Sample of 1st pass rough draft of lwIP logo graphic attached... Don't > know if it'll make it through to everyone; lemme know and I'll forward > it to your email if you're interested in commenting. I like the hummingbird idea. Perhaps we ne

RE: [lwip-users] scribblewiki down

ECTED]> wrote: > I like to see lwIP logo too :) Your hummingbird is nice, but I miss > compactness and simplicity in it. But I am not graphic designer, just > trying to imagine :) > > > 2008/9/25 Pettinato, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> Sample of 1st pass ro

RE: [lwip-users] scribblewiki down

ored in a really cool way. Jared -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pettinato, Jim Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 10:36 AM To: Mailing list for lwIP users Subject: RE: [lwip-users] scribblewiki down Here's an image to use fo

RE: [lwip-users] scribblewiki down

Would it make sense to mirror the contents on the baringforge site as a backup? __ James M. Pettinato, Jr. Software Engineer E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | P: 814 898 5250 FMC Technologies Measurement Solutions Inc. 1602 Wagner Avenue | Erie PA | 16510 USA Phone: 814 898 5000 | Fax: 814 899-3414 w

RE: [lwip-users] lwIP evolutions

You may also want to search the archives of this mailing list; I can recall several good posts regarding porting from previous revisions, which may be beneficial to you. You'll find that quite a bit has changed from 0.6; I started using lwIP at about that time also. The 0.7.2 port wasn't so bad;

RE: [lwip-users] About global parameter initial problem

Another comment: Many 'C' toolchains simply just zero all of the target RAM before the explicit initialization step is executed. Hence, any static vars not explicitly initialized are automatically zero (unless you have a very weird target that does not use zero as a NULL pointer). > bonny gijzen

RE: [lwip-users] About global parameter initial problem

I believe your recollection is accurate Bill, but there exists (existed?) machines that do not use 0 as the internal maching representation of a NULL pointer. All that the standard says is that if you convert a NULL pointer to an arithmetic value in your code, the compiler must generate the answe

RE: [lwip-users] CGI - Porting uIP webserver app (httpd-cgi.c) tolwIP?

Don't be afraid to use JavaScript (especially in conjunction with XML)... the more the client browser does, the better. Since the script runs on the browser and not the server, it lightens the load on the embedded device, and the use of JavaScript can make a simple mechanism to retrieve status

RE: [lwip-users] CGI - Porting uIP webserver app (httpd-cgi.c) tolwIP?

We embed the script within the body... Sample follows, portions omitted for brevity but you should be able to get the idea: Digital Output Data function InitializeForm() { document.all.myForm.DOUT15.style.background='#CCFF00'; document.all.myForm.DOUT15.style.border='0p

RE: [lwip-users] Integrate DNS into LWIP main code

Hello Deepa, Which API are you using? You may want to read up on the DNS client functionality on the lwIP wiki: http://www.wikia.com/lwip - Jim __ James M. Pettinato, Jr. Software Engineer FMC Technologies Measurement Solutions Inc. 1602 Wagner Avenue | Erie PA | 16510 USA

RE: [lwip-users] http_sent cb shows 1 byte trailer [RAW]

olution that could stream the data, filling in the variable portions on the fly. If anybody wishes to review what I have done, either search the archives or drop me a note and I'll forward the latest. - Jim __ James M. Pettinato, Jr. Software Engineer FMC Technologies Measurement Soluti

RE: [lwip-users] DNS question

} else smtp.lastError = SMTP_UNKNOWN_HOST; smtp.state = SMTP_IDLE; } Hope this helps! - Jim __ James M. Pettinato, Jr. Software Engineer E: jim.pettin...@fmcti.com | P: 814 898 5250 FMC Technologies Measurement Solutions Inc. 1602 Wagner Avenue | Erie PA | 16510 USA

RE: [lwip-users] TCP not sending initial ACK

ional data in spite of not seeing an immediate ACK response to the first packet, it should not time out... unless of course the receive window would become zero after one packet. Hope this helps, - Jim __ James M. Pettinato, Jr. Software Engineer E: jim.pettinato mailto:jim.pettin...

RE: [lwip-users] DNS for socket API

-8 (ERR_ARG) would appear to indicate that the netconn_gethostbyname() function is being passed either a NULL pointer for the name to look up, or a NULL pointer for the destination to write the resolved IP address. Check your arguments to the call; my guess would be perhaps you are a level of i

RE: [lwip-users] DNS for socket API

ion setting)? Still there is no DNS packet output which I would expect to see after the call of dns_enqueue()... -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Pettinato, Jim [mailto:jim.pettin...@fmcti.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 4. September 2009 17:27 An: m.zen...@mobatime.com; Mailing list for lwIP u

RE: [lwip-users] DNS for socket API

smaller than that size. Also, I agree a static buffer is probably right - it's the safest option if you have a finite small number of entries to populate. Hope this helps, - Jim -Original Message- From: Mathias Zenger [mailto:m.zen...@mobatime.com] Sent: Thursday, September 10,

RE: [lwip-users] TCP problem

Is anyone else having feelings of déjà vu with this thread?? James M. Pettinato, Jr. FMC Technologies Measurement Solutions Inc. http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/lwip-devel/2008-04/msg00034.html -Original Message- From: lwip-users-bounces+jim.pettinato=fmcti@nongnu.org [mailt

RE: [lwip-users] lwIP 1.3.2-rc1 released

intlvl(lev); -- See this thread in the archives for more background: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lwip-devel/2009-03/msg00017.html Hope this helps! - Jim __ James M. Pettinato, Jr. Software Engineer E: jim.pettin...@fmcti.com | P: 814 898 5250 FMC Te

RE: [lwip-users] System crashes with heavy load while connected to a hub

be protected against interrupts - but isn't - actually gets hit with an interrupt within that vulnerable location. Hope that helps, - Jim From: lwip-users-bounces+jim.pettinato=fmcti@nongnu.org [mailto:lwip-users-bounces+jim.pettinato=fmcti@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of

RE: [lwip-users] Windows 7 Startup crashes LwIP and Free RTOS

Marco, If it were me, I would (at least initially) suspect the Ethernet driver. Are you buffering packets at the driver level on input? Is it possible that your buffer is being overrun due to bursts of broadcast packets or something similar? I recommend that you 1) enable all the debu

RE: [lwip-users] Windows 7 Startup crashes LwIP and Free RTOS

ree RTOS Hi Jim, Thanks for your suggestions. Unfortunately - and i know that's actually the totally wrong answer - i have no knowledge about the Ethernet driver. I'm using this from my port of FREERtos for the AT91SAM7. Can you maybe give me some hints where to look and what section po

RE: [lwip-users] Windows 7 Startup crashes LwIP and Free RTOS

Unfortunately dropbox.com is blocked by the corporate firewall here so I haven't been able to review your drivers. I feel your pain... issues that occur so infrequently are a real challenge to debug. -Original Message- From: lwip-users-bounces+jim.pettinato=fmcti@nongnu.org [mailto:l

RE: [lwip-users] Windows 7 Startup crashes LwIP and Free RTOS

g] On Behalf Of FreeRTOS Info Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 2:04 PM To: Mailing list for lwIP users Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Windows 7 Startup crashes LwIP and Free RTOS On 29/06/2010 18:31, Marco Jakobs wrote: > Hi Jim, > > here is an alternative to the dropbox, if you have some m

RE: [lwip-users] Windows 7 Startup crashes LwIP and Free RTOS

Are there any lower priority tasks that should run independently of the network traffic? If not... this is starting to sound like perhaps the core issue is resource depletion (or a corrupt pbuf pool) leading to a stalled stack... do you have lwip_stats enabled? If so, the stats can be very useful i

RE: [lwip-users] lwIP stack with MODBUS TCP/IP on application layer

I've implemented Modbus/TCP on multiple products using the raw API... but the solution is kind of kludgy because we had already supported serial Modbus in previous iterations of those product lines, so we bolted onto that. I've yet to generalize it for the community, and see no opportunity to d

RE: [lwip-users] Questions about LwIP

subdirectory.) - Jim From: lwip-users-bounces+jim.pettinato=fmcti@nongnu.org [mailto:lwip-users-bounces+jim.pettinato=fmcti@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Luis Rossi Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 11:27 AM To: Mailing list for lwIP users Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Questions about LwIP Thank

[lwip-users] Application developer guide on wiki

Hmm... since "How do I get a working web server with lwIP?" seems to be a rather popular question perhaps that would be a good thing to add as a new topic on the wiki. Better yet, I propose we add a new 'Sample Applications' section in the Application Developer's Manual. I was surprised to discove

RE: [lwip-users] Help on porting LWIP

you are using one of the above platforms - that might help get you started with lwIP. Good luck with your project! - Jim -Original Message- From: lwip-users-bounces+jim.pettinato=fmcti@nongnu.org [mailto:lwip-users-bounces+jim.pettinato=fmcti@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of André Se

RE: [lwip-users] Help on porting LWIP

Linux if that is an option. Again, good luck with your project! - Jim -Original Message- From: lwip-users-bounces+jim.pettinato=fmcti@nongnu.org [mailto:lwip-users-bounces+jim.pettinato=fmcti@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of André Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 9:14 AM To: Mailing lis

RE: [lwip-users] Communication delays, if using lwIP in different network areas

usually only one small block of data written per outgoing packet anyway. To circumvent the delay you are seeing, your application should call tcp_output() after queuing data with tcp_write(). Hope this helps, - Jim From: lwip-users-bounces+jim.pettinato=fmcti@nongnu.org

Re: [lwip-users] page complexity

ally these types of problems are caused by resource depletion (pbufs, tcp pcbs, etc.). Make sure you've allocated enough. Enabling stats and checking the usage levels of the lwip memory pools, etc. will likely help you find the cause. Good luck, - Jim From: lwip-users-bounces+jim.

Re: [lwip-users] pbuf_alloc - is this a bug ?

ts.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users -- Jim Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gibbons and Associates, Inc. TEL: (408) 984-1441 900 Lafayette, Suite 704, Santa Clara,

Re: [lwip-users] LWIP for Altera NIOS II

u.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users -- E-mail signature Jim Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gibbons and Associates, Inc. TEL: (408) 984-1441 900 Lafayette, Suite 704, Santa Clara, CA FAX: (408) 247

[lwip-users] dhcp on multiple interfaces

ed for all broadcasts.  It could probably be used everywhere. -- E-mail signature Jim Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gibbons and Associates, Inc. TEL: (408) 984-1441 900 Lafayette, Suite 704, Santa Clara, CA

Re: [lwip-users] dhcp on multiple interfaces

appear to be very simple. Karl Kobel wrote: Jim,   Are you intending to implement both the client and server on lwip?   If so, I’d be willing to contribute. I’m using the no-OS, raw interface.   Karl ___ lwip-users

Re: [lwip-users] question about compile minimal under Fedora 2

-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users -- Jim Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gibbons and Associates, Inc. TEL: (408) 984-1441 900 Lafayette, Suite 704, Santa Cl

Re: [lwip-users] Tips lwip

The most likely answer is DHCP. There is a module for this in lwip. It will work if the network at the other end of the line provides this service. My knowledge of the details of using DHCP relate to now obsolete revisions of lwIP. Your best bet for that would be to find an example for the

RE: [lwip-users] makefsdata

t filesProcessed; // if no subdir named 'fs' exists, spout usage verbiage printf("\n HTMLGen - HTML to C source converter\n"); printf(" by Jim Pettinato - circa 2003 \n\n"); if (strstr(argv[0], "-s")) processSubs = 0; if ((argc < 3)

[lwip-users] netif_set_ipaddr

rincipal to change a pcb from listening on any IP address to listening on a specific one. Have I missed something? -- Jim Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gibbons and Associates, Inc. TEL: (408) 984-1441 900 Lafayet

Re: [lwip-users] netif_set_ipaddr

t solved the problem that I was concerned about, namely changing a pcb from listening to any IP address to listening to a specific IP address. There may well be situations where this is inappropriate. I hope that a solution satisfactory to all can be found. Leon Woestenberg wrote: Hello Jim,

Re: [lwip-users] Displaying the DHCP assigned IP address (lwip on nios2)

man/listinfo/lwip-users -- Jim Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gibbons and Associates, Inc. TEL: (408) 984-1441 900 Lafayette, Suite 704, Santa Clara, CA

Re: [lwip-users] Displaying the DHCP assigned IP address (lwip on nios2)

inters, whenever I think I understand them, they stop working!   I'm also not sure how to check the dhcp state...   Thanks,   Aidan From: Jim Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 August 2005 16:53 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mailing list for lwIP users Subject:

Re: [lwip-users] LWIP 1.1.0 stability issue

ilman/listinfo/lwip-users -- Jim Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gibbons and Associates, Inc. TEL: (408) 984-1441 900 Lafayette, Suite 704, Santa Clara, CA

Re: [lwip-users] LWIP 1.1.0 stability issue

Thanks for any help or guidelines you can give. Regards, Kjell-Erik ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users -- Jim Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gibbons and Associates, Inc.

Re: [lwip-users] lwip netconn_recv problem

help me.   Best Regardes,   Dorin Mitrut ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users -- E-mail signature Jim Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gi

Re: [lwip-users] Applications to TCP/IP offload

ers mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users -- E-mail signature Jim Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gibbons and Associates, Inc. TEL: (408) 984-1441

Re: [lwip-users] Applications to TCP/IP offload

, it does sound like a really interesting thing to do technically.  On the other, it may actually end up costing you in system performance.  I hope you'll be able to make a good analysis of the likely outcome before you commit yourself. Curt McDowell wrote: Thanks for the input, Ji

Re: [lwip-users] lwIP Checksum routine

hanks, Sathya ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users -- Jim Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gibbons and Associates, Inc. T

Re: [lwip-users] Hardware Assisted Checksum

ld be used. -- Jim Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gibbons and Associates, Inc. TEL: (408) 984-1441 900 Lafayette, Suite 704, Santa Clara, CA FAX: (408) 247

Re: [lwip-users] Hardware Assisted Checksum

.. /Timmy Brolin -- Jim Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gibbons and Associates, Inc. TEL: (408) 984-1441 900 Lafayette, Suite 704, Santa Clara, CA FAX: (408) 247-6395

Re: [lwip-users] Hardware Assisted Checksum

performed in hardware. I suspect that an lwIP implementation might rest on device capabilities described in netif, and flags describing buffer status/contents/needs in pbuf in a similar manner. Sathya Thammanur wrote: Hi Jim, You bring out an interesting point. How about the stack option in lwIP op

Re: [lwip-users] Timing issue with fast interfaces

users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users -- Jim Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gibbons and Associates, Inc. TEL: (408) 984-1441 900 Lafayette, Suite 704, Santa Clara, CA FAX: (408

Re: [lwip-users] Strange ARP behaviour

info/lwip-users -- Jim Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gibbons and Associates, Inc. TEL: (408) 984-1441 900 Lafayette, Suite 704, Santa Clara, CA FAX:

[lwip-users] LWIP sys_init in MicroBlaze

ker?   Any and all comments welcome and very much appreciated.   Jim Law Iris Power ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Re: [lwip-users] LWIP sys_init in MicroBlaze

for sockets-based apps and utilities.    Jim - Original Message - From: Sathya Thammanur To: Mailing list for lwIP users Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 10:15 PM Subject: Re: [lwip-users] LWIP sys_init in MicroBlaze Jim, It looks like you are using the sockets

RE: [lwip-users] (no subject)

ou can probably find one or two emails from me that include source for this updated version; I am sorry but I don't have the time to dig it out and repost it here now. - Jim -Original Message- Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 6:34 AM To: Mailing list for lwIP users Subject: RE: [lwip-use

RE: [lwip-users] Problems with Spartan 3e

Yes... The netif_set_up() was implemented in a later version, and is not in 7.2.x. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kieran Mansley Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 3:50 AM To: lwip-users@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Problems with Spar

RE: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL

was Adam's original protection scheme and not something 'some programmer' added. I am using it and must also vote to retain this code. - Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Graf Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 5:25 AM

RE: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL

constraints go... - Jim __ James M. Pettinato, Jr. Software Engineer FMC Technologies Measurement Solutions Inc. 1602 Wagner Avenue | Erie PA | 16510 USA Phone: 814 898 5000 | Fax: 814 899-3414 www.fmctechnologies.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

RE: [lwip-users] Default lwipopts

here) . #endif Just my initial thoughts... criticism and better ideas are encouraged. - Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kieran Mansley Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 4:49 AM To: Mailing list for lwIP

[lwip-users] LPR or IPP implementation?

to use one or more html pages available on our device - and just tell an IPP printer to print a page via URI? Thanks in advance, - Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Çaglar AKYÜZ Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 4:33 AM To: Mailin

RE: [lwip-users] What lwIP version recommended (most stable)

Wagner, The most recent release is 1.2.0. Typically https://savannah.nongnu.org/news/?group=lwip is updated when a release is issued. For more detailed information regarding releases and stability of such, you can also review the archives of

RE: [lwip-users] Webserver with files

well as the hardcoded pages in ROM. Let me know if you'd like more details. - Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of FreeRTOS.org Info Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 3:39 AM To: Mailing list for lwIP users Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Webs

RE : [lwip-users] BSD API tcp echo server port

Actually, Frederic has suggested something here that I have previously considered recommending... I think it would be much easier for new users to adopt lwIP and much more useful for all of us when adding/maintaining applications if we split the 'contrib' area into separate subsections: 1)Ports

RE : [lwip-users] BSD API tcp echo server port

r client so I just did it myself. I looked the full-blown ARES port that Marc Boucher did and thought it was easier to start with uIP than pare ARES down to just a resolver that would work with the raw interface. Thanks! - Jim On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 08:41 -0400, Pettinato, Jim wrote: > Actu

RE: [lwip-users] BSD API tcp echo server port

Hi Jan, I'll email the code to you directly. Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jan Wester Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 1:55 AM To: 'Mailing list for lwIP users' Subject: SV: [

RE: [lwip-users] running echo server on microblaze XAPP 633

Yes, you need a crossover cable, or a switch. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Brotherton Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 3:37 PM To: lwip-users@nongnu.org Subject: [lwip-users] running echo server

RE: [lwip-users] DHCP - getting address works but not responding

lwIP project - it's good to see acknowlegement in an accepted industry publication such as E.S.D.! - Jim ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

RE: [lwip-users] DHCP - getting address works but not responding

First of all, apologies for not changing the subject line on my previous message which is unrelated to this thread (but I was being lazy and just replied to populate the 'To' address). To take a stab at your problem... I assume you've already added your interfaces to the stack's list prior to DH

[lwip-users] lwIP reference in Embedded Systems Design magazine (previously DHCP - getting address works but not responding)

ently with regard to lwIP?? ;-) -Original Message- From: Goldschmidt Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 2:48 PM To: Pettinato, Jim; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AW: [lwip-users] DHCP - getting address works but not responding

RE: [lwip-users] DHCP - getting address works but not responding

inal Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pettinato, Jim Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 1:37 PM To: Mailing list for lwIP users Subject: RE: [lwip-users] DHCP - getting address works but not responding First of all, apologies for not changing the subject line o

RE: [lwip-users] lwip dead when my board was pluged in ethernet hub

I did have this problem... with revision 7.2.1 of lwIP and prior. I never did get to the bottom of it. Release 1.2.0 seems to work without problems when exposed to our Intranet traffic. Which version are you running? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMA

RE: [lwip-users] HTTP client source code

point out other potential sources of http applications/solutions. - Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jacob Gorm Hansen Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 9:41 AM To: Mailing list for lwIP users Subject: [lwip-users] HTTP client source code h

RE: [lwip-users] HTTP client source code

ay, May 21, 2007 10:16 AM To: Mailing list for lwIP users Subject: RE: [lwip-users] HTTP client source code On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 10:06 -0400, Pettinato, Jim wrote: > Jacob, > > There's one available in the Savannah repository's contrib area - and > I believe it still builds a

[lwip-users] DNS client for lwIP raw API

r forward it to your specific email address. - Jim __ James M. Pettinato, Jr. Software Engineer E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | P: 814 898 5250 FMC Technologies Measurement Solutions Inc. 1602 Wagner Avenue | Erie PA | 16510 USA Phone: 814 898 5000 | Fax: 814 899-3414 www.fmctechnologies.com resolv.c D

[lwip-users] Usage example for DNS client (resolv.c)

sed. Hope you find it useful, - Jim // sample DNS callback function - callback for SMTP server name lookup void smtp_serverFound(char *name, struct ip_addr *ipaddr) { if ((ipaddr) &&

RE: [lwip-users] Usage example for DNS client (resolv.c)

o sabotage our equipment... I'll see what I can do about those... - Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goldschmidt Simon Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 9:09 AM To: Mailing list for lwIP users Subject: RE: [lwip-users] Usage example f

RE: [lwip-users] Usage example for DNS client (resolv.c)

Subject: RE: [lwip-users] Usage example for DNS client (resolv.c) On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 09:39 -0400, Pettinato, Jim wrote: > Well... I'm sure Adam won't mind us borrowing from uIP... ;-) and the > required citations are included. > > As for me, I ported it with the intention o

RE: [lwip-users] DNS client for lwIP raw API

P raw API This is sweet. I've been wanting some DNS functionality for awhile. Thanks. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Pettinato, Jim > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 5:30 AM > To: Mailing list for lwIP users

RE: [lwip-users] DNS client for lwIP raw API

D] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Winformatik Info Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 11:09 AM To: Mailing list for lwIP users Subject: Re: [lwip-users] DNS client for lwIP raw API Hi Jim, I have tested the resolver code from you. It is working great... after a little debugging. I always had the

RE: [lwip-users] webserver with method=POST

back=10 Maybe this approach will suit your needs? Note: If you do decide that full support for forms is required for your app, and you go ahead and implement something, I would be interested in that functionality as well. I just can't justify the effort now for our project

RE: [lwip-users] RAW API Interupts

that can be done in non-interrupt time. Likewise with the timer - set a flag on your timer interrupt at the appropriate interval. Then, the main application loop can process incoming packets and invoke the tcp timer functions based on presence of the flags. - Jim -Original Me

RE: [lwip-users] alignment problems

I've never seen a compiler that supported 8 bit chars that couldn't address each of them individually. The processor may not address them individually, but you should be able to access each char independently at the higher level. That's what higher level languages do - hide the details of the hard

[lwip-users] How to add IGMP to LWIP 1.1

I am using the LWIP 1.1, and wondering if there is anyone has done the IGMP porting to this version. Is there quick patch for it? Thanks. ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

RE: [lwip-users] BasicWeb.c behavior

I think the issue they're expressing is that the PCB memory pool's associated stats.err member gets incremented in this case even though the fail/kill/retry sequence ends up being successful? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Larm

RE: [lwip-users] Problem with long term running of lwIP.

I've been fighting something that sounds at least similar - at particular customer sites - for over a month. For me, it's locking up about every 48-60 hours, with a casually polling Modbus TCP connection (~ 200 ms between polls) - and lwIP 1.2.0. It requires a power cycle of our equipment to restor

RE: [lwip-users] Problem with long term running of lwIP.

Well... I finally got it to happen on my development system, by putting it on the corporate LAN and letting it get bombarded by all those stupid broadcast messages. The state of the driver was that the ring buffer tail pointer ended up with a NULL pbuf pointer, so it was stalled. And my pbuf res

[lwip-users] Corrupt output packets with multiple TCP protocols active

llocation area of my code, but in several days of probing haven't really seen a hole in my low-level driver. I've tried some changes to that code with no effect also. Any ideas?? Thanks in advance, - Jim __ James M. Pettinato, Jr. Software Engineer E: jim.pettinato mailto:[

RE: [lwip-users] ethernet dead if plug to switch .

I'm a bit behind in my perusing of the list, so sorry if you've solved this already. I have found that the major difference between these two scenarios (crossover cable vs. Intranet) is the amount of broadcast traffic that must be handled. Hence, problems when attached to the network are typicall

RE: [lwip-users] using loopback

Your netif may not support loopback, but your driver hardware might... many MAC/PHY chips do. If you can afford to miss incoming packets long enough to change the chip's mode, issue your test packet, and return the chip to normal operation that could be a potential solution. -Original Message

RE: [lwip-users] Choosing lwIP

With a bit of digging, it appears to me that Altera farmed out the stack porting/maintenance task to interniche tecnologies, inc. - TCP/IP networking is not Altera's core compentency so I can understand the move. Now they don't have to worry about keeping up to date or supporting issues with the st

Re: [lwip-users] Download a file for firmware upgrade

One other possibility you might want to consider is to implement an FTP (or TFTP) _server_, rather than a client, on your lwIP device; this allows for push updates if desired. The user can then (optionally) accept the new image for installation locally. Down side is that this is even trickier as

Re: [lwip-users] lwIP 2.1.2 released

I'm sure you get your share of email so not to give you more ... just have to thank you guys for the effort on this. Very nice job. Thanks. Jim & co. On Thu, November 22, 2018 1:14 pm, goldsi...@gmx.de wrote: > lwIP 2.1.2 is now available from the lwIP download area on savannah [1]