This was what I was trying to say,
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
I'll try to check this week. In the meantime, please try to apply this :
If people want stable LXQt, don't use the daily PPA, upgrade to Xenial and
use official repository. Most people should use this, and there is a LXQt
metapackage.
If people want dev version of LXQt (git snapshot), usr the dai
Well that is what the instructions are doing. Are you implying saying
basically, "tl;dr install the package and you are good"?
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.u
Perhaps it would be good to explain that this metapackage does in one step
what the directions proceeding do?
On Apr 24, 2016 21:48, "Simon Quigley" wrote:
> I've modified the wiki page[1] to state:
>
> "At this time, we are waiting for the LXQt metapackage to be included in
> the Ubuntu reposito
I've modified the wiki page[1] to state:
"At this time, we are waiting for the LXQt metapackage to be included in the
Ubuntu repositories. For now, use the ppa:tsimonq2/lxqt-meta PPA for an
up-to-date metapackage. The purpose of this PPA is to simplify installing the
packages required for LXQt.
Good point here. PPAs are, in general, to be considered unstable and
unsupported (read: risky). This is true with both of the PPAs we're
discussing.
Often times daily build PPAs track upstream changes which may create
problems. Because of this, they should not be recommended.
The reason using the
Greetings,
This was a simple issue on my part, that was easily solved. His PPA has a lot
more things to worry about. Also, my package is relatively stable. If you wish
to grab the source and take a look for yourself, go right ahead.
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
-
I guess I missed a lot of the conversation when I replied earlier.
I was not aware of the process. I really though you were working of
Julien's Meta.
I know a lot of people(testers) have been using Julien's Meta for a
while and therefore when something breaks or is out of place it is
fixed very
Thank you Simon,
I do not have system to upgrade anymore so I won't have a chance to
test. But If I find some time I'll try to do a fresh install in a VM.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Simon Quigley wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I found out what the problem was and I have adjusted the wiki pag
Greetings,
I found out what the problem was and I have adjusted the wiki page.
The difference from the daily PPA and my PPA is that my PPA is *just* the
metapackage and the daily PPA has more than that.
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
@Simon .Thank you but like I said I found the issue. one or all of
these 3 were missing after installing the metapackage . libkf5screen6
and/or libkf5screen-dev and/or libkf5screen-bin.
As far as the command I ran they were simple copy and paste from the wiki page.
After that I started to trouble
Greetings,
Do you have the exact dep errors and commands you ran? I would be able to
assist if you had that.
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mai
So usually I use this repo to do my installs
https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-dev/+archive/ubuntu/lubuntu-daily
But as expected for a dev daily build it can break. So for more
comfort I went to the wiki :
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/LXQt
Witch has a nice easy to read howto . I upgraded to 16.0
13 matches
Mail list logo
