Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Vivid desktop amd64 does not boot on MacBook Pro

2015-02-11 Thread Fritz Hudnut
Lars: Had the chance to download the daily for vivid yesterday and I "burned" it to a USB drive . . . using LM17 USB disk creator on my '10 MBPro. I also have rEFInd installed. Booted up using the option key and I got two FW icons labeled as "EFI boot" . . . I picked the first one. There were s

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Vivid desktop amd64 does not boot on MacBook Pro

2015-02-11 Thread Lars Noodén
On 11.02.2015 18:24, Fritz Hudnut wrote: > ... So, for the 2015210 build I did not have the same > problem with boot from USB. Thanks. I still get #1415848 when booting from a USB made with "dd" on the 2015-02-10 image: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1415848 I'll have to

[Lubuntu-qa] Fwd: Call for testing: GTK 3.15.4

2015-02-11 Thread Walter Lapchynski
While we continue to develop LXQt, please do some heavy testing on this new version of GTK3 which is likely to land in vivid. There's more on [PPA testing][] in the wiki. I point this out especially to the artwork team as it sounds like there are some bugs we may have to watch out for. [PPA testi

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Fwd: Call for testing: GTK 3.15.4

2015-02-11 Thread Jackson Doak
Can i please add that ppa:ubuntu-gnome-packaging/shell-3.16 will contain all the extra parts needed to make the gnome shell work properly with GTK, so if you're on ubuntu-gnome, it would help to have this installed On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 3:55 AM, Walter Lapchynski wrote: > While we continue to

[Lubuntu-qa] vivid vervet daily build

2015-02-11 Thread Ian Bruntlett
Hi, This evening I downloaded the Vivid Vervet daily build i386 alternate iso for testing - here is the MD5 of the iso in question:- c66edcbaabfaec2230352612c8b0656d 20150211-vivid-alternate-i386.iso Instead of using UNetBootIn I used the Startup Disk Creator. The install ran perfectly from USB

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] vivid vervet daily build

2015-02-11 Thread Dave Kokandy
s the MD5 of the iso in question:- > c66edcbaabfaec2230352612c8b0656d 20150211-vivid-alternate-i386.iso > > Instead of using UNetBootIn I used the Startup Disk Creator. The install > ran perfectly from USB flash drive so that's a bonus. Note - maybe when the > ISOs are sent out t

[Lubuntu-qa] Lubuntu testcases

2015-02-11 Thread Walter Lapchynski
I asked for people to help with testcases and Istimsak Abdulbasir answered the call. He has now had his [first submission][] (for Gnome System Monitor) merged! Based on that experience, I made a [new folder][] for LXDE and Lubuntu-only components. Note that LXTerminal is not included, but it is in

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Lubuntu testcases

2015-02-11 Thread Saqman2060
So that I am clear, any application beginning with "lx" or related to openbox is LXDE related and needs test cases for ? -Original Message- From: "Walter Lapchynski" Sent: ‎2/‎11/‎2015 6:18 PM To: "lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net" Subject: [Lubuntu-qa] Lubuntu testcases I asked for peop

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Lubuntu testcases

2015-02-11 Thread Walter Lapchynski
Well everything should have testcases, ultimately. As far as stuff that goes in the LXDE folder, they should either be Lubuntu specific (Lubuntu Software Center) or relate to some essential piece of LXDE. The terminal is not one. The window manager (openbox) is not one. If testcases exist for them,

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Lubuntu testcases

2015-02-11 Thread Walter Lapchynski
openbox can work on any flavor (for example, it could replace xfwm in xfce). additionally, lxde can work with any window manager (like xfwm, or, in my case, awesome). so that would go in the main packages directory. however, by this same token, any panel can be used to replace lxpanel. so that's w