On 2013-10-28 19:22, Federico Leoni wrote:
> 2013/10/28 Nio Wiklund :
>> On 2013-10-28 19:07, Federico Leoni wrote:
>>
>> Maybe you test the tarball, and when it needs no more tweaking, I'll
>> make a combo img.xz file with the OBI + the Lubuntu 13.10 OEM tarball.
>>
>
> Agree. Let me test the tar
2013/10/29 Nio Wiklund :
> On 2013-10-28 19:22, Federico Leoni wrote:
>> 2013/10/28 Nio Wiklund :
>>> On 2013-10-28 19:07, Federico Leoni wrote:
>>>
>>> Maybe you test the tarball, and when it needs no more tweaking, I'll
>>> make a combo img.xz file with the OBI + the Lubuntu 13.10 OEM tarball.
>>
Blueprint changed by amjjawad:
Assignee: (none) => Lubuntu-QA
--
Lubuntu QA Sub-Team needs a New Team Leader
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/lubuntu-brainstorming/+spec/lubuntu-qa-sub-team
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsu
2013/10/29 Federico Leoni :
> 2013/10/29 Nio Wiklund :
>> On 2013-10-28 19:22, Federico Leoni wrote:
>>> 2013/10/28 Nio Wiklund :
On 2013-10-28 19:07, Federico Leoni wrote:
Maybe you test the tarball, and when it needs no more tweaking, I'll
make a combo img.xz file with the OBI
Hi Federico,
See replies inline and at the end.
Best regards/Nio
On 2013-10-29 17:59, Federico Leoni wrote:
> 2013/10/29 Federico Leoni :
>> 2013/10/29 Nio Wiklund :
>>> On 2013-10-28 19:22, Federico Leoni wrote:
2013/10/28 Nio Wiklund :
> On 2013-10-28 19:07, Federico Leoni wrote:
>
Quick reply without quote:
1. Better leave the xorg config completely automated. I fear it will
cause troubles on system with different GPU .
2. Try to force another geo location or install without network up.
3. I'm on the dark side of OEM. I prefer tarball as is but it's a
thing that we need to
Hi Federico and other Lubuntu Users,
See replies inline and at the end.
Best regards/Nio
On 2013-10-29 18:33, Federico Leoni wrote:
> Quick reply without quote:
>
> 1. Better leave the xorg config completely automated. I fear it will
> cause troubles on system with different GPU .
OK, so without
Well Nio, you put a lot of questions for a project born to be a
super-simple installer that is already working fine. This means, at
least for me, that we are ready to enter into phase two of the
project. Good.
Using the xorg.conf is not a good idea because is obsolete but can
override a configurat
On 2013-10-29 23:11, Federico Leoni wrote:
> Well Nio, you put a lot of questions for a project born to be a
> super-simple installer that is already working fine. This means, at
> least for me, that we are ready to enter into phase two of the
> project. Good.
>
> Using the xorg.conf is not a good
2013/10/29 Nio Wiklund :
> On 2013-10-29 23:11, Federico Leoni wrote:
>
> I think this convinced me to make the system ready for the end user
> (skipping the oem-stage).
>
> Would there still be a need for an open text file with simple
> instructions? In that case, what instructions?
If you skip t
On 2013-10-30 00:59, Federico Leoni wrote:
> 2013/10/29 Nio Wiklund :
>> On 2013-10-29 23:11, Federico Leoni wrote:
>>
>> I think this convinced me to make the system ready for the end user
>> (skipping the oem-stage).
>>
>> Would there still be a need for an open text file with simple
>> instructi
11 matches
Mail list logo