Hi Christopher,
Until you get an answer from Phill, I suggest that you download an
alternate iso and start testing it.
What kind of environment is available for you to test it?
safe end
- VirtualBox or some other virtual machine
- Dedicated test computer
- Your second computer (with a system ins
Hi again Christopher,
I think you know at least as much as I about testing :-D
Anyway, you need to live too, so only if you have some time now ...
please try installing Lubuntu from an alternate iso. You would help us
perform a good beta 1 test. I think it will finish today or tomorrow.
If you
On 9/4/13 8:35 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> The desktop isos of Lubuntu Saucy beta 1 are tested rather well by now,
> but the alternate isos are lagging behind. Please help testing the
> alternate iso files, amd64+mac & armhf+ac100 :-)
One smallish bug that you might find in the Alt
I will have completed the alt-64's in the next few hours.
Regards,
Phill.
On 4 September 2013 11:30, Lars Noodén wrote:
> On 9/4/13 8:35 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > The desktop isos of Lubuntu Saucy beta 1 are tested rather well by now,
> > but the alternate isos are lagg
On 2013-09-04 12:30, Lars Noodén wrote:
> On 9/4/13 8:35 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> The desktop isos of Lubuntu Saucy beta 1 are tested rather well by now,
>> but the alternate isos are lagging behind. Please help testing the
>> alternate iso files, amd64+mac & armhf+ac100 :-)
>
Phill,
I have that iso already. Should we both test it, would you like to do
it, or would you like me to do it?
I think it might be a good idea that we are both testing it, because I
am not that I understand all the bells and whistles of the encryption.
Best regards
Nio
On 2013-09-04 17:11, Phi
I'll also test it. Never any harm in having two results!
Regards,
Phill.
On 4 September 2013 16:24, Nio Wiklund wrote:
> Phill,
>
> I have that iso already. Should we both test it, would you like to do
> it, or would you like me to do it?
>
> I think it might be a good idea that we are both t
If we're 'hitting' the alt-32 bit, that just needs the desktop 32 bit
remaining tests and we're good to go!
Regards,
Phill.
On 4 September 2013 16:29, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> I'll also test it. Never any harm in having two results!
>
> Regards,
>
> Phill.
>
>
> On 4 September 2013 16:24, Ni
As you will have read, I'm resigning my positions on all teams. This means
that lubuntu need an extra release manager and new Team Leader.
As soon as this is decided I'll hand over the team and the person applying
for release manager can liase with Julien.
I'll still be testing, so you will still
On 09/04/2013 12:35 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> The desktop isos of Lubuntu Saucy beta 1 are tested rather well by now,
> but the alternate isos are lagging behind. Please help testing the
> alternate iso files, amd64+mac & armhf+ac100 :-)
>
> See this link
>
> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.c
>> My current plan is to finish the uncompleted amd64 live tests, and then
>> to hit the i386 alternate tests, but I don't know what I'm doing with
>> encryption so I'll skip that test.
>>
>> Lance
I got the amd64+mac Alternate tests done. I'm not sure what
differentiates them from the regular am
Hi,
as this email is sent out, I am now dis-engaging from all the above teams.
@ Nicolas, I'll maintain a subscription to the page
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Hardware and continue to update it.
I wish you all the very best for the future.
Phill.
-- Forwarded message --
From:
On 2013-09-04 17:09, Erick Brunzell wrote:
> On 09/04/2013 12:35 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> The desktop isos of Lubuntu Saucy beta 1 are tested rather well by now,
>> but the alternate isos are lagging behind. Please help testing the
>> alternate iso files, amd64+mac & armhf+ac10
I'm just finishing the alt-64 encrypted one. I'll grab an alt-32 and do the
encrypted one for that in a few hours (takes a couple of hours for me to
download an ISO).
Regards,
Phill.
On 4 September 2013 16:09, Erick Brunzell wrote:
> On 09/04/2013 12:35 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
> > Hi everybod
Ooop, my bad.
desktop 64 Bit is the other outstanding one...
(It's been a long day :P )
Regards,
Phill.
On 4 September 2013 16:47, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> If we're 'hitting' the alt-32 bit, that just needs the desktop 32 bit
> remaining tests and we're good to go!
>
> Regards,
>
> Phill.
Hi,
The 'Alternate Install (Encryption) in Lubuntu Alternate i386 for Saucy
Daily'
To my understanding the installation worked well. Max gave me the whole
drive.
There was only a minor obstacle: It is somewhat confusing at the
partitioning: The system complained about partition sda5, although I
Long few days :^(
Just after posting about my typical i386 test box still being down due to a
suspected Xorg bug my son showed up with a borked carburetor off his
prehistoric motor home!
So I'm trying to rebuild a mid 70's Dodge carb while doing these tests.
Just shoot me, please shoot me, put
Well, Phill, to be honest I am a bit shocked. I really hope you are fine and
it's not a health issue or something like that.
I send you my best wishes!
Am 04.09.2013 um 15:49 schrieb Phill Whiteside :
> As you will have read, I'm resigning my positions on all teams. This means
> that lubuntu
I'm shocked.
I'd be willing to go for release manager, if no one else does.
Are you stopping immediately, or is there a date when things have to
get changed over.
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Joern wrote:
> Well, Phill, to be honest I am a bit shocked. I really hope you are fine and
> it's no
What ? What ?
I'm very sorry. I hope you are fine in your health and... I don't know what
else to say..
This is unbelievable..
- Original Message -
From: Joern
Sent: 09/04/13 11:39 AM
To: Phill Whiteside
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Team Lead / Release Manager
Well, Phill, to be honest I am
20 matches
Mail list logo
