Hi, The 'Alternate Install (Encryption) in Lubuntu Alternate i386 for Saucy Daily'
To my understanding the installation worked well. Max gave me the whole drive. There was only a minor obstacle: It is somewhat confusing at the partitioning: The system complained about partition sda5, although I had asked it to use the whole drive. I went back and wiped all partitions, and there was still a complaint. Maybe because sda5 is to have the 'crypto-LUKS' file system. But the installation worked and a good encrypted system was created with a master password before Lubuntu itself was booted and in turn demanded a password. The swap partition and zRAM are both working, PCmanFM is not crashing when I 'eject the current partition' ... -o- And when booted from a pendrive, I could mount the small boot partition, but it should contain no secrets. The real information is in sda5, which was not mountable: mount returned this error output mount: unknown filesystem type 'crypto-LUKS' Best regards Nio On 2013-09-04 17:29, Phill Whiteside wrote: > I'll also test it. Never any harm in having two results! > > Regards, > > Phill. > > > On 4 September 2013 16:24, Nio Wiklund <nio.wikl...@gmail.com > <mailto:nio.wikl...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Phill, > > I have that iso already. Should we both test it, would you like to do > it, or would you like me to do it? > > I think it might be a good idea that we are both testing it, because I > am not that I understand all the bells and whistles of the encryption. > > Best regards > Nio > > On 2013-09-04 17:11, Phill Whiteside wrote: > > I'm just finishing the alt-64 encrypted one. I'll grab an alt-32 > and do > > the encrypted one for that in a few hours (takes a couple of hours for > > me to download an ISO). > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Phill. > > > > > > On 4 September 2013 16:09, Erick Brunzell <lbsol...@yahoo.com > <mailto:lbsol...@yahoo.com> > > <mailto:lbsol...@yahoo.com <mailto:lbsol...@yahoo.com>>> wrote: > > > > On 09/04/2013 12:35 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote: > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > The desktop isos of Lubuntu Saucy beta 1 are tested rather > well by > > now, > > > but the alternate isos are lagging behind. Please help > testing the > > > alternate iso files, amd64+mac & armhf+ac100 :-) > > > > > > See this link > > > > > > http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/270/builds > > > > > > I am zsyncing the 32-bit alternate iso now, but I have only > time for a > > > few more tests before it will be too late ... > > > > > > Best regards > > > Nio > > > > > My current plan is to finish the uncompleted amd64 live tests, > and then > > to hit the i386 alternate tests, but I don't know what I'm > doing with > > encryption so I'll skip that test. > > > > Lance > > > > -- > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa > <https://launchpad.net/%7Elubuntu-qa> > > <https://launchpad.net/%7Elubuntu-qa> > > Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net > <mailto:lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net> > > <mailto:lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net > <mailto:lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net>> > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa > <https://launchpad.net/%7Elubuntu-qa> > > <https://launchpad.net/%7Elubuntu-qa> > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > > > > > > > -- > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw > > > > > -- > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
