On Jun 30, 2013, at 2:27 PM, Lars Noodén wrote:
On 6/30/13 9:21 PM, ke...@refaceplace.net wrote:
On Jun 30, 2013, at 1:47 PM, Lars Noodén wrote:
[snip]
I've run apport-collect against this bug. It was only possible by
tunnelling X over SSH. Should launchpad be able to work with text
or
On 6/30/13 9:21 PM, ke...@refaceplace.net wrote:
>
> On Jun 30, 2013, at 1:47 PM, Lars Noodén wrote:
[snip]
>> I've run apport-collect against this bug. It was only possible by
>> tunnelling X over SSH. Should launchpad be able to work with text or is
>> that too much of an edge case?
>>
>> Rega
On Jun 30, 2013, at 1:47 PM, Lars Noodén wrote:
On 27 June 2013 17:54, Lars Noodén wrote:
On 6/27/13 7:44 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
Those are the only two bugs against PPC, if you are describing a
3rd one
(no GUI after install) then that needs raising
ubuntu-bug xorg
Regards,
Phill.
> On 27 June 2013 17:54, Lars Noodén wrote:
>
>> On 6/27/13 7:44 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
>>> Those are the only two bugs against PPC, if you are describing a 3rd one
>>> (no GUI after install) then that needs raising
>>>
>>> ubuntu-bug xorg
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Phill.
>>
>> I've raised a b
Thanks,
can someone from the PPC testing team please confirm this critical bug so
it can get looked into.
Regards,
Phill.
On 27 June 2013 17:54, Lars Noodén wrote:
> On 6/27/13 7:44 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> > Those are the only two bugs against PPC, if you are describing a 3rd one
> > (no
On 6/27/13 7:44 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Those are the only two bugs against PPC, if you are describing a 3rd one
> (no GUI after install) then that needs raising
>
> ubuntu-bug xorg
>
> Regards,
>
> Phill.
I've raised a bug about X. It is here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xo
Those are the only two bugs against PPC, if you are describing a 3rd one
(no GUI after install) then that needs raising
ubuntu-bug xorg
Regards,
Phill.
On 27 June 2013 17:27, Lars Noodén wrote:
> On 6/27/13 7:25 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> > Just to double check, this is
> > https://bugs.lau
Just to double check, this is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-ppc/+bug/1153972 that you
are referring to?
Regards,
Phill.
On 27 June 2013 17:23, Lars Noodén wrote:
> On 6/27/13 7:17 PM, Lars Noodén wrote:
> > On 6/27/13 7:14 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> >> from the ctrl-alt-f1
On 6/27/13 7:14 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> from the ctrl-alt-f1 and login, can you start a GUI session? If so, please
> create a bug with the details of the bug and a workaround. I can then
> include both the recursive fauly and that bug in the release notes so there
> is at least one PPC alpha1.
from the ctrl-alt-f1 and login, can you start a GUI session? If so, please
create a bug with the details of the bug and a workaround. I can then
include both the recursive fauly and that bug in the release notes so there
is at least one PPC alpha1.
Regards,
Phill.
On 27 June 2013 17:09, Lars Noo
On 6/27/13 7:25 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Just to double check, this is
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-ppc/+bug/1153972 that you
> are referring to?
>
> Regards,
>
> Phill.
Yes, but as far as I can tell that is a grey bug. It occurs only during
the installation process and
On 6/27/13 7:17 PM, Lars Noodén wrote:
> On 6/27/13 7:14 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
>> from the ctrl-alt-f1 and login, can you start a GUI session? If so, please
>> create a bug with the details of the bug and a workaround. I can then
>> include both the recursive fauly and that bug in the release
On 6/27/13 6:59 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Ah,
>
> I saw the usual recursive bug, but the other bug was a grey bug. It needs
> to marked as red. I'll un-ready it.
>
> Regards,
>
> Phill.
The recursive bug on PPC can be worked around, by intervening in the
bootloader, but the other bug doesn't
Ah,
I saw the usual recursive bug, but the other bug was a grey bug. It needs
to marked as red. I'll un-ready it.
Regards,
Phill.
On 27 June 2013 16:53, Lars Noodén wrote:
> On 6/27/13 6:50 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> > Yeah, I saw them for alternate and have marked it as ready. The desktop
On 6/27/13 6:50 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Yeah, I saw them for alternate and have marked it as ready. The desktop PPC
> obviously will not be getting an A1 release.
>
> Regards,
>
> Phill.
Unless Keith or someone figures out the trick needed to get the finished
Alternate install to boot, then
.net Cc:
> >> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 8:20 AM Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa]
> >> Alpha 1 tests
> >>
> >> On 6/27/13 4:16 PM, Lance wrote:
> >>> I can't help with PPC, armhf, or amd64+mac :^(
> >>
> >> I thought we got PPC and AMD64+mac
, June 27, 2013 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alpha 1 tests
On 6/27/13 4:16 PM, Lance wrote:
> I can't help with PPC, armhf, or amd64+mac :^(
I thought we got PPC and AMD64+mac yesterday. The PPC image still
won't
boot even with yesterday's respin. Both Keith and I made ent
an tell
> us what's still needed.
>
> I think on i386 and amd64 we're good enough for an Alpha 1, but Phill may
> have different ideas.
>
> Lance
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Lars Noodén
> To: lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
> Cc:
&g
odén
To: lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Alpha 1 tests
On 6/27/13 4:16 PM, Lance wrote:
> I can't help with PPC, armhf, or amd64+mac :^(
I thought we got PPC and AMD64+mac yesterday. The PPC image still won't
boot ev
On 6/27/13 4:16 PM, Lance wrote:
> I can't help with PPC, armhf, or amd64+mac :^(
I thought we got PPC and AMD64+mac yesterday. The PPC image still won't
boot even with yesterday's respin. Both Keith and I made entries for
the Live test for yesterday's respin. Should entries be made again for
all
20 matches
Mail list logo
