On 06/18/2013 02:03 PM, Jonathan Marsden wrote:
> Wait.. Average end users are not logging in as root. Or running sudo
> all the time. So how exactly is this a risk? Any time a user uses sudo
> is "a bit risky for the average end user"! If you do not want them to
> do that, don't give them an accou
2013/6/18 Julien Lavergne
> 2013/6/18 Leszek Lesner :
> > As far as I know the gnome-disk-utility is a good diagnosis tool for
> SMART
> > and other data around harddrives. It also warns you whenever you make a
> > destructive move. So I don't think we should remove it.
>
> It's also the only way
2013/6/18 Leszek Lesner :
> As far as I know the gnome-disk-utility is a good diagnosis tool for SMART
> and other data around harddrives. It also warns you whenever you make a
> destructive move. So I don't think we should remove it.
It's also the only way I know to format an USB drive easily (no
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013, at 08:36 AM, Erick Brunzell wrote:
> On 06/18/2013 05:26 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
>> On 2013-06-18 09:18, Erick Brunzell wrote:
>>> I've always wondered why we, or any OS, would include a potentially
>>> dangerous app in the "Accessories" column of a menu. ...
>> What feature i
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Erick Brunzell wrote:
>
> IMHO any app that allows repartitioning and/or formatting of a disc or
> partition is a bit risky for the average end user. I maintain a few
> dozen PC's for mostly elderly pensioners and I always remove it
> post-installation just to be
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Erick Brunzell wrote:
> On 06/18/2013 05:26 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
> > On 2013-06-18 09:18, Erick Brunzell wrote:
> >> I've always wondered why we, or any OS, would include a potentially
> >> dangerous app in the "Accessories" column of a menu. IMHO Red Hats
> >>
On 06/18/2013 05:26 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
> On 2013-06-18 09:18, Erick Brunzell wrote:
>> I've always wondered why we, or any OS, would include a potentially
>> dangerous app in the "Accessories" column of a menu. IMHO Red Hats
>> 'gnome-disk-utility' only adds risk so why do we even include it as
On 2013-06-18 09:18, Erick Brunzell wrote:
> I've always wondered why we, or any OS, would include a potentially
> dangerous app in the "Accessories" column of a menu. IMHO Red Hats
> 'gnome-disk-utility' only adds risk so why do we even include it as a
> default app?
>
> In many ways it's compara
Hi,
Without explaining why we should do that, it is hard to tell whether
yes or no :)
What makes it "potentially dangerous" application?
Thank you!
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Erick Brunzell wrote:
> I've always wondered why we, or any OS, would include a potentially
> dangerous app in t
On 06/18/2013 10:54 AM, Erick Brunzell wrote:
> I'm just trying to determine if anyone thinks it's either useful or
> destructive. IMHO it's seldom useful and potentially destructive for
> clueless end-users ;^)
>
> I think it was just pulled into Ubuntu's default apps when GNOME went to
> version
As far as I know the gnome-disk-utility is a good diagnosis tool for SMART and other data around harddrives. It also warns you whenever you make a destructive move. So I don't think we should remove it.-- Gesendet von meinem HP Pre3Am 18.06.2013 09:24 schrieb Lars Noodén : On 06/18/2013 10:18 AM, E
On 06/18/2013 02:24 AM, Lars Noodén wrote:
> On 06/18/2013 10:18 AM, Erick Brunzell wrote:
>> I've always wondered why we, or any OS, would include a potentially
>> dangerous app in the "Accessories" column of a menu. IMHO Red Hats
>> 'gnome-disk-utility' only adds risk so why do we even include it
On 06/18/2013 10:18 AM, Erick Brunzell wrote:
> I've always wondered why we, or any OS, would include a potentially
> dangerous app in the "Accessories" column of a menu. IMHO Red Hats
> 'gnome-disk-utility' only adds risk so why do we even include it as a
> default app?
>
> In many ways it's comp
13 matches
Mail list logo
