Hi, Without explaining why we should do that, it is hard to tell whether yes or no :)
What makes it "potentially dangerous" application? Thank you! On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Erick Brunzell <lbsol...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I've always wondered why we, or any OS, would include a potentially > dangerous app in the "Accessories" column of a menu. IMHO Red Hats > 'gnome-disk-utility' only adds risk so why do we even include it as a > default app? > > In many ways it's comparable to Gparted which Ubuntu long ago decided to > provide only on the live image so it would be available for installation > purposes. BTW I think Gparted is much easier for even a noob to use. > > So I just wanted us to think about possibly dropping > 'gnome-disk-utility' from "depends" and/or "recommends". It's not an > earthshaking thing .............. just a thought. > > Lance > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa > Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- "All of us are smarter than any one of us." Best Regards, amjjawad Start Ubuntu Test Machine: ASUS F3F Laptop - Intel Core Duo T2350 @ 1.86GHz with 489MB RAM -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
