Den 2015-03-02 16:36, Lars Noodén skrev:
>> Hi Lars,
>>
>> Walter made the alternate testcase available again, so we use it as a
>> template:
>>
>> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/326/builds/89862/testcases/1439/results
>>
>> "Alternate Install (Encryption) in Lubuntu Alternate i386 f
> Hi Lars,
>
> Walter made the alternate testcase available again, so we use it as a
> template:
>
> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/326/builds/89862/testcases/1439/results
>
> "Alternate Install (Encryption) in Lubuntu Alternate i386 for Vivid Daily "
>
> I think we can use the U
Den 2015-02-27 20:06, Lars Noodén skrev:
> On 27.02.2015 20:36, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
>> ...
>> If you do want to help with testcases, I emphasize how important it is
>> to make sure that we have matching testcases for both desktop and
>> alternate. Please make sure to read the documentation on
Hi again Walter,
You wrote "Well, at this point it seems LVM only works if you already
have LVM set up."
That statement is not true. The problem is not that bad for 32-bit
Lubuntu. It works if you wipe the drive and make a new MSDOS partition
table. And it is the same problem for the alternate an
Overall, the more test cases the better. That is the whole idea I believe.
We are trying to test every aspect if Ubuntu catching anything that hurts
its functionality. If we believe a test case should primary then we should
make primary or optional. We want to grow our testcase database. It is
als
Hi again Walter,
You wrote "Well, at this point it seems LVM only works if you already
have LVM set up."
That statement is not true. The problem is not that bad for 32-bit
Lubuntu. It works if you wipe the drive and make a new MSDOS partition
table. And it is the same problem for the alternate an
I think (in general) removing testcases is a bad idea. Some testcases
may be more edge cases (which I believe to be the case with
encryption/LVM), at which point we can make them optional.
That being said, I agree with having encryption/LVM testcases for both
desktop and alternate, assuming that t
On 27.02.2015 20:36, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
>...
> If you do want to help with testcases, I emphasize how important it is
> to make sure that we have matching testcases for both desktop and
> alternate. Please make sure to read the documentation on styles and
> such. A hint on that: there's no su
Your [bug comment][1] alone is telling, Nio. It basically agrees that
it's not behaving correctly. Long story short is if you do a bunch of
things that are inconsistent with the [testcase][2] and probably not
intuitive to any average user, then it works. That's simply not good
enough.
If you do wa
Hi Walter,
If I can prove? In my opinion my test reports at the QA-tracker and the
mails to you show in detail what I did and what results I had. If that
is not enough, I'm sorry. I can't come to your place and show in your
computer ;-) What I can do is write a comment in the bug report 1425681.
I have to rely on what I hear from testers, especially when multiple
testers report the same thing:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1425681
If you can prove that it is not true, then perhaps that might suggest other
behaviors.
Still, I don't want LVM to be a mandato
Hi Walter,
It is *not* true that LVM only works if you already have LVM set up. It
works also from a blank drive (with only a partition table created by
for example gparted, no partitions at all). And it works with Lubuntu
Vivid 32-bit installed from the desktop as well as from the alternate
insta
Well, at this point it seems LVM only works if you already have LVM
set up. This seems to be problematic.
Also, it's imperative that we limit our scope in order to not get
overwhelmed. We have a small team and can only do so much. The scope I
consider appropriate includes packages we can support o
Den 2015-02-26 10:06, Nio Wiklund skrev:
> [posting at the end]
>
> Den 2015-02-26 08:45, Nio Wiklund skrev:
>> [posting at the end]
>>
>> Den 2015-02-26 07:36, Nio Wiklund skrev:
>>> Den 2015-02-26 02:17, Walter Lapchynski skrev:
We were having some trouble with LVM with the alternate instal
On 26.02.2015 08:36, Nio Wiklund wrote:
>...
> @ Walter: I suggest that we have at least one testcase with LVM,
> encrypted disk and encrypted home. If we cannot keep the one that exists
> now for the alternate iso, I suggest that we make one for the desktop iso.
>...
+1 it is important to be able
[posting at the end]
Den 2015-02-26 08:45, Nio Wiklund skrev:
> [posting at the end]
>
> Den 2015-02-26 07:36, Nio Wiklund skrev:
>> Den 2015-02-26 02:17, Walter Lapchynski skrev:
>>> We were having some trouble with LVM with the alternate installer and
>>> it made me really question why we have
[posting at the end]
Den 2015-02-26 07:36, Nio Wiklund skrev:
> Den 2015-02-26 02:17, Walter Lapchynski skrev:
>> We were having some trouble with LVM with the alternate installer and
>> it made me really question why we have it at all. We don't have a
>> similar testcase for desktop. Considering
Den 2015-02-26 02:17, Walter Lapchynski skrev:
> We were having some trouble with LVM with the alternate installer and
> it made me really question why we have it at all. We don't have a
> similar testcase for desktop. Considering the little support we have
> for alternate images among the release
+1
Phillw
On 26 February 2015 at 01:17, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> We were having some trouble with LVM with the alternate installer and
> it made me really question why we have it at all. We don't have a
> similar testcase for desktop. Considering the little support we have
> for alternate ima
We were having some trouble with LVM with the alternate installer and
it made me really question why we have it at all. We don't have a
similar testcase for desktop. Considering the little support we have
for alternate images among the release team, I don't really with to
push the envelope. That be
20 matches
Mail list logo
