Hi all,
I just finished installing Lubuntu Precise Beta 1 on a Dell Inspiron 3500
with the above specs using the i386 Alternate Install.
The Guided - Entire Disk install was textbook. Took about two or three
hours, I forget.
The laptop doesn't have built-in Ethernet or Wireless hardware, so I ha
It looks as if even my PII is more modern than I thought, it is pae
compatible, so it is not good for these particular tests.
I think I have another PC a gateway P5 120 buried deeper in the
shelving system, however it is noted as 43MB ram and I do not know
if I have any suitable to get up to 128
On 04/03/12 23:31, UH wrote:
> 1) No icon for network connection in the panel, only an empty space
In my PII -400 PC I had this too. A mouse action at the expected place
produced a connection info and on some occasions the network icon did
in fact appear.
--
alan cocks
--
Mailing list: https:/
An add on re Powermanagement/suspend to ram/suspend to disk
In the xfce powermanagement options the suspend to ram options are
disactivated. Why?
Suspending the powerbook to disk results in a failure trying to wake
up the computer. The failure is the same i described for the alpha
live-cd. After
I finally succeeded in installing beta 1 12.04 ppc. This are the
problems i notice, at a first glance:
1) No icon for network connection in the panel, only an empty space
2) The black background problem persists even after upgrading
3) The advanced desktop menu now, has all important options but
That is correct another command that would show if pae or not
sudo lshw -C processor
If you see pae in the list it is pae compatible.
nm_geo Greg
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 3:17 PM, alan c wrote:
> My PC (pentium II)
> =
> grep pae /proc/cpu
On 04/03/12 21:51, alan c wrote:
> (new team member here..)
>
> I had a Pentium II - 400 PC holding up some shelves (literally) and
> heard the call for low spec PCS.
>
> Am I correct in thinking that the PII chipset will necessarily be non
> pae? And is the objective of this sort of test th
Lance I just did another mini.iso install today with the 20120203 date.
What I have found is that using only the lubuntu-core initially does a
better job.
I then booted to the installed Lubuntu-core.. used Xterm and sudo
installed synaptic right away. *Note: " just doing the lubuntu-desktop
rig
My PC (pentium II)
=
grep pae /proc/cpuinfo
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 mtrr pge mca
cmov pse36 mmx fxsr up
=
So it looks like it is pae compatible??!
So I
Quite simply tasksel has been very unreliable, particularly so since I
requested this change:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-meta/+bug/931237
Personally if I had to choose ATM I'd say stick with CLI.
But the worst problem is that most of those effected seem to have Pentium M
Phill,
I actually have a half a dozen G3 iMacs, with two or three different processors
and graphic chips. Its just that it takes a while do some testing on these,
while testing my G4 eMacs (two of those two) and G4 iBook at the same time.
With the G3 iMacs that problem has been, for all sorts o
(new team member here..)
I had a Pentium II - 400 PC holding up some shelves (literally) and
heard the call for low spec PCS.
Am I correct in thinking that the PII chipset will necessarily be non
pae? And is the objective of this sort of test that the Lubuntu kernel
is pae compatible, and do
in terminal
scrot -d 5
Hit enter
minimize terminal
you should have a screenshot in home directory
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 8:35 AM, UH wrote:
> 2012/3/4 ∅ :
> > re: "messed up console" do you have a screenshot? does this sound like
> > the issue?
> > https://lists.launchpad.net/lubuntu-qa/msg0
Yes, Chris we have checked the tasksel listing..
SEE below
greg@greg-Latitude-D620:~$ tasksel --list-tasks
u ubuntustudio-font-metaLarge selection of font packages
*i lubuntu-coreLubuntu minimal installation*
u mythbuntu-desktopMythbuntu additional roles
u mythbuntu-frontendMythbu
Hi there Steven glad you are trying that non-pae mini.iso.. I wish i had a
good answer for you the ethernet wired connection is the only way i know
too get the initial install working. Now if we had a alternate or desktop
iso with non-pae kernel we could get that b43 working after the install.. I
Hi Lars,
They are automatically built about the same time each day.
Regards,
Phill.
On 4 March 2012 18:20, Lars Noodén wrote:
> On 3/4/12 7:35 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> > Hi Lars,
> >
> > my apologies, the QA tracker is at
> > http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/204/builds for th
On 3/4/12 9:47 PM, alan c wrote:
> I have used the Lubuntu beta 1 alternate iso 32 bit and it booted ok,
> but it was not a daily image of course.
I've gotten other images to boot fine too, it's the one from today that
is off.
Regards.
/Lars
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Po
I have used the Lubuntu beta 1 alternate iso 32 bit and it booted ok,
but it was not a daily image of course.
On 04/03/12 18:59, Lars Noodén wrote:
> I've tried the alternate CD image from today, twice, and can't get it to
> boot. I've entered the data and a bug:
> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatrac
I've tried the alternate CD image from today, twice, and can't get it to
boot. I've entered the data and a bug:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/204/builds/12975/testcases/1172/results
The desktop+mac image is not yet available.
Regards,
/Lars
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.ne
Aloha,
That tasksel might be a bit beginner friendly, however did anyone test
already if Lubuntu Desktop is even added to that? We've only become
official this release, that might mean someone could have overlooked it.
Note that it will take a lot more from our side in terms of documentation.
Givi
I have applied to join
lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
I guess that might make some of this faster?
I am easy, whatever, I can likely drop out of the list later. I am
mostly into advocacy and direct support of novices mostly elderly an
dcomputer fairs advocacy etc, rather than dev stuff so expect
On 3/4/12 7:35 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Hi Lars,
>
> my apologies, the QA tracker is at
> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/204/builds for the current
> set of dailies, this list gets flushed each 7 days...
Thanks. Is there a way to get notified by mail when these are updated
oth
There is no such thing as a dumb question :) It is my 1st time as the
lubuntu QA co-ordinator, so believe you me - I've asked plenty of newbie
questions on #ubuntu-testing :) Last release, we had adhoc testing; this
time we're on a steep learning curve of full iso testing.
Thanks for joining and w
Hi Lars,
my apologies, the QA tracker is at
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/204/builds for the current
set of dailies, this list gets flushed each 7 days. When the Release
Candidate for beta 2 is announced I will post the link for it. It is seeing
signs of activity on the Release Can
On 3/4/12 6:06 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> ... but there needs to be some sign of life on the iso tracker...
How is that done?
Regards,
/Lars
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
More he
Hi,
There needs to be some sign of life on the testing. We were asked by the QA
team if lubuntu had anyone testing the intel-mac system and had to be
honest and say that we were unaware of any one. They have been told that we
have at least one tester now, that is sufficient to keep that variant
al
2012/3/4 ∅ :
> re: "messed up console" do you have a screenshot? does this sound like
> the issue?
> https://lists.launchpad.net/lubuntu-qa/msg00122.html
1. How can i do a screenshot of a console (after Ctr-Alt-F1)? I know
only the gnome or xfc.e screenshot utility . . . ?
2. No, the bug you poin
Hi Alan,
hopefully this will give you an idea of where we are up to.
Thanks for agreeing to help, it means that Steven won't die of loneliness :)
Phill.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Phill Whiteside
Date: 3 March 2012 11:09
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Non-pae testing
To: Lance
C
Hi Alan,
yeah, that would be great.
Thanks,
Phill.
On 4 March 2012 14:41, alan c wrote:
> On 03/03/12 22:51, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> > Hiyas,
> >
> > Yeah, for the testing of lubuntu [1] [2]
> >
> > We need some 128Mb RAM machines [2] . These are needed for non PAE
> chipsets
> > as well. W
Hi Alan,
yeah, that would be great.
Thanks,
Phill.
On 4 March 2012 14:41, alan c wrote:
> On 03/03/12 22:51, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> > Hiyas,
> >
> > Yeah, for the testing of lubuntu [1] [2]
> >
> > We need some 128Mb RAM machines [2] . These are needed for non PAE
> chipsets
> > as well. We
How much coverage do we need to ensure that there will be an official
release? I'm especially worried about amd64. I'll start testing on the
Intel Mac as soon as I'm back on my feet.
wxl
On 03/02/2012 05:18 AM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: *Jean-Bap
re: "messed up console" do you have a screenshot? does this sound like
the issue?
https://lists.launchpad.net/lubuntu-qa/msg00122.html
re: black background-- use `ubuntu-bug lubuntu-artwork`
wxl
On 03/04/2012 05:16 AM, UH wrote:
> Thanks. I posted my observations to the Ubuntuforums.org thread "
Hi,
if the bug needs resurrecting for 12.04, then it needs doing :) My reason
for asking is does one of the methods resolve the problem. Giving the
person who will be sorting the bug out a tested method of resolving the bug
makes life a little more bearable for them :)
Regards,
Phill.
On 4 Marc
Thanks. I posted my observations to the Ubuntuforums.org thread "PPC
Testers needed". How to do a bug report regard the messed up console
screen or the black background i really don't know. Apport does not
ask me nothing . . . ;-)
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : l
Hi Phill,
No need to call me boss, I'm just the point of contact. Anyhow, please go
ahead with your suggestion. An other suggestion would be the use of a
"sandbox", a temporary area on someone's own wiki like
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MrChrisDruif/Sandbox where I've been tinkering with
a new header
Hi, Phill,
Thanks.
On 3/3/12 3:57 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Hi Lars,
>
> I don't have one to play with, but having had a read on the Mac-Intel FAQ
> section at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1046568 There are two
> areas to look at from my limited understanding
>
> What is rEFI
* Source Package: lubuntu-software-center
* Version: 0.0.3~bzr161+201203040950~precise1
* Architecture: i386
* Archive: lubuntu-desktop PPA
* Component: main
* State: Failed to build
* Duration: 16 minutes
* Build Log:
https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop/+archive/ppa/+build/3258287/+fi
* Source Package: lubuntu-software-center
* Version: 0.0.3~bzr161+201203040949~oneiric1
* Architecture: i386
* Archive: lubuntu-desktop PPA
* Component: main
* State: Failed to build
* Duration: 8 minutes
* Build Log:
https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop/+archive/ppa/+build/3258286/+fil
* Source Package: lubuntu-software-center
* Version: 0.0.3~bzr161+201203040950~natty1
* Architecture: i386
* Archive: lubuntu-desktop PPA
* Component: main
* State: Failed to build
* Duration: 4 minutes
* Build Log:
https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop/+archive/ppa/+build/3258285/+files
39 matches
Mail list logo
