http://www.formspring.me/EdmundM/q/406945771976419136
It's hard to promote Ubuntu if you lose the convince that Ubuntu/Canonical
is something good. Why do you make it so hard to believe for many of
us that Ubuntu is still something good and worth to sacrifice our free time?
First the Amazon ads a
Spamm is compatible with foss?
Al 23/12/12 19:20, En/na Lucas Betschart ha escrit:
http://www.formspring.me/EdmundM/q/406945771976419136
It's hard to promote Ubuntu if you lose the convince that
Ubuntu/Canonical is something good. Why do you make it so hard
to believe for many of us that Ubun
Canonical is already working with the developer of Super Meat Boy to
resolve their issues, and has been for a while now. This is all a
result of miscommunication, not malice or "immoral behavior".
Please try to avoid spreading misinformation or accusations. We all
want what is good for Ubuntu, o
Al 23/12/12 19:20, En/na Lucas Betschart ha escrit:
> http://www.formspring.me/EdmundM/q/406945771976419136
>
> It's hard to promote Ubuntu if you lose the convince that
> Ubuntu/Canonical is something good. Why do you make it so hard
> to believe for many of us that Ubuntu is still something good
To me that's *always* been part of the problem. Why isn't there a statement
about what happened and how it's being fixed? There is no ”both parts" here.
I know several Canonical employees, and they're all good people, so when
Michael says it's being worked on, I trust that implicitly.
But in the
On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 19:20 +0100, Lucas Betschart wrote:
> That's not compatible with the spirit of FOSS.
The proliferation of commercial products in the Ubuntu market has been a
good thing; the general promotion of proprietary software and
encouraging the funding of proprietary software over th
