To me that's *always* been part of the problem. Why isn't there a statement about what happened and how it's being fixed? There is no ”both parts" here.
I know several Canonical employees, and they're all good people, so when Michael says it's being worked on, I trust that implicitly. But in the real world, people only know what they hear, and they routinely hear nothing from Canonical until the damage is done. On Dec 23, 2012 3:02 PM, "David Planella" <david.plane...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > Al 23/12/12 19:20, En/na Lucas Betschart ha escrit: > > http://www.formspring.me/EdmundM/q/406945771976419136 > > > > It's hard to promote Ubuntu if you lose the convince that > > Ubuntu/Canonical is something good. Why do you make it so hard > > to believe for many of us that Ubuntu is still something good and worth > > to sacrifice our free time? > > > > First the Amazon ads and now this. That's not compatible with the spirit > > of FOSS. > > > > Many of our local Community already switched to other distribution like > > Debian & Fedora. Luckily they're still active in our community because > > we see our mission mainly in spreading the spirit of FOSS and aren't > > only Ubuntu Fanboys. > > > > How is the situation in your LoCo? Are there already people not showing > > up anymore at events because of the immoral behavior of Canonical? > > > > > > Hi Lucas, > > I would recommend to first listen to both parts before making a > judgement. So far you have heard only one side of the story. Making > assumptions from that will never bring you the full picture. > > As a Canonical employee (who hasn't been involved in this topic, though) > I can tell you that the last thing we do is to act with malice. It may > have well been a confusion (either from Canonical or from the > developer), but when there is confusion we act to fix it. I've also > found that assuming good faith is always the best approach. > > Spreading incomplete assumptions and calling fellow community members > fanboys does not contribute to solving anything, and it's not beneficial > to either Ubuntu, Canonical or the developer. > > I'd suggest waiting from an authoritative reply from Canonical before > making any judgement. > > Thanks. > > Cheers, > David. > > > -- > loco-contacts mailing list > loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts > >
-- loco-contacts mailing list loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
