On 17/04/12 01:06, David Planella wrote:
> If you know for certain that there will only be one document at the end
> of this process, I can do the changes straight away.
Yes, there will only be the one merged document at the end of the process.
Thanks David, super cool tool you have there :) !
M
On 17/04/12 11:02, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Dmitry Agafonov
wrote:
Indeed, for the purposes of digitally signing the document and
becoming an Ubuntero,
it should probably be the original document in English.
LoCos though would love to have the document in thei
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Dmitry Agafonov
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> From the early times there were impression, that CoC (like GPL) should
> be only available (and signed) as English text, and translations may
> exist for informational purposes only.
>
Indeed, for the purposes of digitally signing
Hi!
>From the early times there were impression, that CoC (like GPL) should
be only available (and signed) as English text, and translations may
exist for informational purposes only.
--
Dmitry Agafonov ~ http://agafonov.pp.ru/
--
loco-contacts mailing list
loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com
https
Al 17/04/12 09:41, En/na Daniel Holbach ha escrit:
> Hey David,
>
> thanks a lot for your work on this.
>
> On 17.04.2012 09:36, David Planella wrote:
>> Seeing this new update, last night I went ahead and added
>> internationalization support to the CoC, LCoC and the merged CoC.
>>
>> I had trie
Hey David,
thanks a lot for your work on this.
On 17.04.2012 09:36, David Planella wrote:
> Seeing this new update, last night I went ahead and added
> internationalization support to the CoC, LCoC and the merged CoC.
>
> I had tried it a couple of times in the past, but didn't complete it due
>
Al 16/04/12 15:00, En/na Laura Czajkowski ha escrit:
> Hi just to let people know and so they can share with their teams, the
> Ubuntu code of conduct has been updated. For more information please see
> - http://fridge.ubuntu.com/2012/04/16/code-of-conduct-update/
>
Thanks Laura,
Seeing this new
On 16/04/12 16:52, Neal McBurnett wrote:
I looked, but it wasn't clear how to see diffs between this and the last
version, because there are so many diffs, nor how to find versions before
number 15, or how to figure out the version number of the last one we adopted.
Can someone post a link to
> I looked, but it wasn't clear how to see diffs between this and the
> last version, because there are so many diffs, nor how to find
> versions before number 15, or how to figure out the version number of
> the last one we adopted.
Agreed. I was even willing to step through each diff, until I h
I looked, but it wasn't clear how to see diffs between this and the last
version, because there are so many diffs, nor how to find versions before
number 15, or how to figure out the version number of the last one we adopted.
Can someone post a link to a nicely-formatted diff?
Neal McBurnett
10 matches
Mail list logo