>
> Undo erroneous corrections.
Thanks Jeff!
-Chris
___
llvm-commits mailing list
llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
Thanks for the cleanups Jeff, but...
On Apr 21, 2007, at 6:17 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote:
> @@ -1400,12 +1396,12 @@
>uitofp ( CST to TYPE )
>Convert an unsigned integer constant to the corresponding
> floating point
>constant. TYPE must be floating point. CST must be of integer
> type.
Reid Spencer wrote:
> -cause these bits to be set: 0xFF1F.
> +cause these bits to be set: 0xFF1F.
.
Nick
___
llvm-commits mailing list
llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
On Apr 3, 2007, at 10:46 PM, Reid Spencer wrote:
> Changes in directory llvm/docs:
>
> LangRef.html updated: 1.225 -> 1.226
> ---
> Log message:
>
> Appease Chris' pedantic streak.
Heh, it's just a streak?
-Chris
___
llvm-commits mailing list
llvm-com
On Apr 3, 2007, at 7:42 PM, Reid Spencer wrote:
>
> Remove intrinsics that we will not be implementing.
> Fix the anchor names of intrinsics to all be int_ so as to distinguish
> them from the i_ prefix reserved for instructions.
Hey Reid,
Please make sure nothing else references these links ou
On Apr 1, 2007, at 5:20 PM, Reid Spencer wrote:
>
>
> -The 'llvm.bwsap' family of intrinsics is used to byteswap
> integer
> +The 'llvm.bwsap' family of intrinsics is used to byte
> swap integer
> values with an even number of bytes (positive multiple of 16
> bits). These are
Typo rema
> +This is an overloaded intrinsic function. You can use bswap on
> any integer
> +type that is an even number of bytes (i.e. BitWidth % 16 == 0).
> Note the suffix
> +that includes the type for the result and the operand.
>
> + declare i16 @llvm.bswap.i16.i16(i16 )
> + declare i32 @llv
> Document 'inreg' & 'sret'
Nice.
> @@ -743,14 +730,15 @@
> sext
> This indicates that the parameter should be sign extended
> just before
> a call to this function.
> +inreg
> +This indicates that the parameter should be placed in
> register (if
> +possible) during
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 10:45 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2006, at 10:40 AM, Reid Spencer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 10:29 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote:
> >
> >> I thought only 32- and 64-bit integers were allowed?
> >
> > I thought we agreed on any size for sequential type indices
On Dec 4, 2006, at 10:40 AM, Reid Spencer wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 10:29 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
>> I thought only 32- and 64-bit integers were allowed?
>
> I thought we agreed on any size for sequential type indices. See
> PR950.
> I codified the rules after we agreed on them.
The
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 10:29 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote:
> I thought only 32- and 64-bit integers were allowed?
I thought we agreed on any size for sequential type indices. See PR950.
I codified the rules after we agreed on them.
Reid
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messag
> Index: llvm/docs/LangRef.html
> diff -u llvm/docs/LangRef.html:1.174 llvm/docs/LangRef.html:1.175
> --- llvm/docs/LangRef.html:1.174 Mon Nov 27 15:53:28 2006
> +++ llvm/docs/LangRef.htmlSun Dec 3 10:53:48 2006
> @@ -2491,9 +2491,9 @@
> provided depend on the type of the first pointer a
12 matches
Mail list logo
